Two Opportunities for Video Game Developers

  1. more realistic and useful knowledge, information, and learning resources.

    I mention this in the review for Starfield, but it is buried beneath a rant and want to reiterate it here without all the ranting. Science fiction games like that should include more useful research materials involving the applicable sciences they deal with.

    Consider the feature of mining minerals for crafting, resources, and trade. What is it about those minerals that makes them useful for that particular application? Having studied chemistry briefly and being familiar enough with technology manufacturing to understand basic applications of rare earth minerals, I am aware that there is a realistic order to the selection of elements that are included as features in the game.

    However, it does not provide data as to why those inorganic materials are useful in certain applications, such as their volatility, polarity, radioactivity, use as an acid, oxidization, and all that valuable scientific research that we want children to know about as they grow up so they can be better prepared to innovate technological solutions with their own ingenuity. The earlier they are able to conceptualize and understand those concepts the earlier their minds can start formulating solutions in the subconscious in alignment with their dreams, desires, and chosen purpose in life.

    Best to consult reputable professionals in these fields for this information. They don’t need to provide formal research documents with citations that are peer reviewed for research and development purposes, but they could probably provide a few paragraphs that explain the basic concept with the important facts. Those research standards are necessary for research because of how important it is to respect scientific power because of its potential danger during experimentation and potential ethical abuse, but in a video game science fiction setting, you can just convey the knowledge.

    Knowledge and information such as that is an infinitely abundant resource for human progress. It does not decay, it does not run out, it does not damage the environment to harvest, and its benefits are infinitely worth the costs of acquiring it. Such knowledge needs to be made available as much as possible to everyone.

    In the professional world, college education and higher learning are still applicable because that often involves understanding the total depth of the knowledge and its applications with practical exercises, experiments, and requirements for meeting standards before advancing to levels with more responsibility and access to resources that can be used in experimentation.

    Naturally you don’t want volatile materials in the hands of people who do not truly understand and respect what they are because they are dangerous and need to be controlled with safeguards that protect those who work them. Then there is the highly advanced laboratory equipment that is needed to conduct experiments. Most people cannot afford acquiring stuff like that for personal use, which is why it is accessible in collegiate environments in addition to private companies, both of which require a minimum qualification to access.

    Private companies are less inclined to allow the freedom of curiosity for learning purposes because they are generally business oriented and need to maintain profits to stay in operation, but collegiate environments are not limited in that way. That equipment is often also delicate and expensive and although mistakes happen and it breaks by accident from time to time, generally you want people with a professional interest operating it. There is nothing wrong with accidents like that as long as people are honest about what happens because of the danger of it being operated with unintended consequences if it is damaged without the people using it being aware of what that damage is. From what I understand, standard scientific and engineering practices are well aware of this mindset and why it is important.

    The government politicians could learn from that way of doing things as applicable to their jobs as well if they think of legislation and bureaucratic systems as machines and equipment of conceptual reality. If someone makes a mistake and is hiding it in the government, that could cause a lot more damage to other people indirectly involved when that mistake is revealed by a failure in operations as a result of the mistake.

    Do not discipline people for making a mistake and owning up to it right away, however upset people may be because of the importance of the situation. If they hide it and do not inform their supervisors or report it as appropriate if they are the supervisor, then they need to be disciplined severely. That encourages reporting and discourages hiding, which makes for a more efficient process with higher quality results. It’s as simple as that and has nothing to do with punishment or personal issues. An added benefit is that it encourages good character by reinforcing trustworthiness.

    As my elementary school taught me: character counts. Now put that between two slices of buttered bread and grill it on both sides to a crispy golden brown.

    Also, these applications of adding knowledge could be applicable with historical examples, social sciences, or anything else. If you are conveying wisdom in such a way, it is best to do it with story and examples, but if you intend to convey knowledge it is best to just state it as plainly and clearly as possible. Do not occlude it to try and teach something subversively. It may work, but it is inefficient and unnecessary.

    Wisdom is more complex of a topic than knowledge, which is not so easily conveyed directly in clear terms. Nor are all people as receptive to such forms of learning which can be dry and heavy like this document, and that’s fine. Wisdom is vital to our survival though, which is why it needs to be taught regardless, and why storytelling is important for doing so. Stories make it flavorful and easy to receive and are generally a good use of one’s time because that time is enjoyed.

    Wisdom is what cultivates good judgment, and good judgment can save a person’s life or the entire world and you never know when it will be called upon or why. Best to teach it, not force it, but do your best to ensure people learn what is most important: good is always true, evil is always false. As simple and trite as that appears, the truth is often not clearly definable, has subjective context, and can in fact appear as totally opposite.

    That is why adults and elders are typically respected because they have had more opportunities for gaining experience and wisdom to learn subtle and gross qualities with deeper understanding than what a situation appears to have. That’s not always the case though, because elders can prove themselves entirely foolish in judgment, just as a child can prove themselves incredibly wise. Consider the gospel account of Jesus’ childhood when he goes missing, his family can’t find him, and he is found at the temple teaching the elders. Then, consider the song “Old Man’s Rubble” by Amy Grant.

    …Are you walking with unnecessary burdens,

    are you trying to take them upon yourself?

    If you are then you are living in bondage…

    And are you trying to live by your emotions,

    are you putting your faith in what you feel and see

    then you’re living just to satisfy your passions,

    and you’d better be careful because you’re being deceived.

It is okay to listen to and trust your emotions and your perceptions, but that cannot be the determining factor of a person’s judgement because those senses alone are inadequate. The higher truth of conceptual reality requires gaining an understanding which is detached from emotion and perception. It is an understanding which religious laity accept on faith and know as true through practice in daily life.

Religious scholars gain that understanding through the link of logical understanding created through study and contemplation that ascends beyond emotion and perception and arrives at a solid foundation that is the truth of divine reality. That truth of divine reality can be realized with knowledge alone. It does not stop there though, because that is the base level. Faith can take a person’s understanding and wisdom to heights infinitely beyond that, but the knowledge is sufficient to justify the truth and factual existence of the highest divine.

With that certainty as a known fact, it can be applied in all situations of judgment to determine good and evil. Proficiency doing so is wisdom. Mastery doing so is great wisdom. In either case, gaining that wisdom requires honesty with oneself and a keen awareness of one’s emotions and perceptions because those provide indications of conscience. Although conscience may seem irrational at the time, it proves itself justified when a situation can be considered in retrospect.

Gaining proficiency in wisdom requires being aware of what sensations the conscience has, and then applying knowledge and experience to understand why those sensations occur and correctly judge a situation as good or evil with an understanding from higher conceptual reality. Why is it correct to say stealing is wrong (i.e. evil, but that is too strong word now)? You would need to understand social systems, government, legal justice, human psychology, and all manner of aspects of civilization to really understand the moral implications of why it is wrong. Most people find it sufficient to trust their conscience in addition to obeying the people who are trusted to know the full understanding. That is another reason why public officials must be held to the highest standard of a community and no corruption among them tolerated whatsoever, and why the USA government has lost all trust by demonstrating brazen corruption and evil with their actions.

We got a little sidetracked here into the difference between knowledge and wisdom and why one is better conveyed with story and the other better conveying in the simplest clarity possible. That simple clarity tends to be without entertaining diversions and minimal possibilities of subjective interpretation. Knowledge is easier expressed with direct words, while wisdom is easier expressed with abstract concepts, images, and relatable characterization woven together in a plot. It is one thing to state a proverb, another thing to teach it.

Teaching should never be made more difficult than necessary. Practice is one thing, teaching is another. Practice can be as difficult as possible for great benefit, but that is only effective if the teaching has been obtained to do the practice correctly. To make use of practice, no matter how difficult it may be designed, is why the teaching needs to be first and done without unnecessary difficulty.

2. I would prefer to keep this as brief as possible, so that is what I am going to do.

There needs to be more adult romance fantasy in games. That doesn’t mean it needs to be pornographic, but video game characters should have more options to freely explore romance in all kinds of ways and have tremedous fun doing what is probably not going to happen in real life for most people. The same way violence can be explored in video games without worry about it happening in real life (and in fact helps reduce unsanctioned violence; sports and military exercises being sanctioned), having a lot more freedom for romantic fantasy in video games will help reduce sexual perversions in real life.

Reduce perversions, not reduce sexuality. Social expressions of romance and sexuality will be less toxic and more of what people of a community are comfortable with, without that needing to be defined. I write it as without needing definition, because often times throughout life and all time, there have been, are now, and will always be new situations that defy expectations for love among a human population. When that happens, you want it to be something you can be comfortable with, not something that will put you into a murderous rage.

Shartfield, unexpectedly unpleasant

The following is my formal review of the video game mega corp Bethesda’s recent game, Starfield, or as I prefer to call it, Shartfield. For those of you who do not know what a shart is, it is a fart in which a person accidentally shits their pants at the same time.

I’ve ranted enough about that game online elsewhere about it having terrible dialogue writing and being designed sloppily with constant bugs throughout, but that is not what brings me to the keys now.

The worst quality of the game is its story. The story is absolute garbage and not worth a person’s time. It is not motivating, not interesting, and is morally bankrupt by trying to pass off an evil agenda as worth deliberating over. What is this evil agenda? Between the lines it appears to be holding the topic of circumcision on an equal level of reason and dignity as human rights and human dignity, which it has no place at. Doing so is in fact an insult to human rights, dignity, and freedom in general because circumcision is an affront to life, love, happiness, common sense, reason, goodness, and all that is sacred. It is an abomination not worth talking about among intelligent beings because of how obviously wrong it is.

To be more specific, the game’s plot centers around politics. The main plot does not involve a threat, a danger, or a reason for going through with it aside from it being the main story programmed into the game and the added benefit of mostly useless extra abilities it renders.

The game’s biggest pivotal moments are about the player making a purely political decision with no compelling reason why the two parties cannot come to a solution without the protagonist’s intervention. If such a situation exists, neither party is worthy of my intervention because they would not understand the higher concept with which I judge them since they were not able to arrive at the conclusion themselves.

Simply put: there is no human dilemma, least of all ideological conflicts, that are not easily resolved in a matter of minutes by intelligent beings without violence or disagreement. That is because there is a universal truth of a common good which all walks of life inevitably arrive at, and that universal truth is applicable at all times with everything. If those “higher” beings squabbling over space trinkets don’t realize that, they are not worthy of possessing technology at all because they do not understand the responsibility that technology entails.

Without knowing how important it is to not abuse technology, they are dangerous and are better off euthanized if they will not learn or accept the higher truth of universal agreement. Even circumcision can meet there, however stupid that idea is, it simply cannot continue the practice of forcing its beliefs on children (or anybody) because those practices negate all that is good, sacred, and worth fighting for. The continued flesh sacrifices of newborns practiced by the savages of the Middle East, a practice often coated with a toxic lie of pseudoscience about human nature that has no justification or evidence to back up its conclusion, is the antithesis of life, love, and intelligence.

There is no reason to be discussing it among civilized people in this day and age, and if the people who demand it will not accept the reason why, which can be easily explained, their obstinance is a threat because they have no respect for the sacred divinity which is the source of all truth. Without respect for a transcendent authority of the highest order of divinity that is the epitome and ideal of justice, love, goodness, truth, wisdom, and something which is entirely conceptual for mortal beings, like an ideal that can be attained toward with infinite progress but never actually reached— such imbeciles unable to recognize the truth and importance of that highest divinity are a threat to all forms of life and civilization.

They believe they themselves are the highest authority and the source of divine existence for inheriting scriptures they have no faith in, and thus answer to no laws, order, morality, and are total self-serving tyrants incapable of being benevolent to others because of their inability to comprehend enough of reality imposed by the limitations a living body with its lack of omniscience and handful of sensory organs. Those tyrants who think themselves the source of divine authority and the highest authority as men with small ideas, have no inhibition to prevent them from doing evil to serve the perverse and carnal desires that they understand all of human life to be.

Case and point: what is the main reason why they insist on circumcision? Desire for carnal perversion.

If one is going to make an unfliching demand and not be moved by their principles, they need to know without a doubt by the ineffable proof of reason that theirs is the correct course of action. This is certainly possible the same way mathematical matters can be ineffable in their reliability as a proof for various applications. One plus one equals two. This is not a matter of debate. Good is always true and evil is always false. This is not a matter of debate. Good sources from the highest divine above all beings, creatures, and creation itself, and evil sources from the human mind abusing divine authority for perverse desires of oppressing others underneath their will, such as circumcision does.

Good is divine, evil is human. Fact. Good is always important and to be safeguarded and protected, and evil is always to be rejected, rebuked, spurned, and thwarted at all possible costs. If one is good, evil cannot overcome them by any means or costs to themselves. The smallest good is more powerful than all the powers of evil combined and even if they are multiplied exponentially, evil remains entirely inadequate.

So, if one’s demand at any sort of ideological impasse cannot be supported by effective reason that proves true, it is inadmissable. Circumcision cannot provide effective reason to support its claim, and furthermore, effective reason can be provided to prove the evil, falseness, and necessity for abandoning that abhorrent practice. That was a fact that the origin of Christianity emodies. It was known back then as true, and it remains true to this day, because that is how truth works. It is universal for all beings through all time.

The fact that people are still discussing circumcision like it is a problem that has not been solved is an indication of their evil intentions and unworthiness to be making decisions because they are not evolved beyond the first century intellectually.

Lastly, if either party is too arrogant, unreasonable, and selfish to accept less than another party in any agreement that achieves an important resolution, they are not worthy to be making decisions either because their hubris is a threat to everyone else. It doesn’t matter if you think the divisions of parts is fair, even if you know you are the most wise. If you are the most wise, you are not reliant on objects, money, resources, or any such thing because you live by wisdom alone and that is all you need. It is no problem to take the lesser amount because it makes no difference to you.

That is not an excuse to be unjust or to abuse parties by cajoling them into taking less, but it is something that is an honor for a party to do when it is required. Only arrogant fools are slighted at having less than others because they covet like savage beasts that do not understand that what is good about anything transcends what that thing is and flows into it. The point is that goodness is not dependent on the matter or energy of a thing for that goodness to be received.

So in conclusion, Shartfield is garbage because it poses questions from characters that are supposedly “higher beings” but they embody exactly that which is a lesser nature to intelligent life, and the way those situations are presented in the game is an insult to the intelligence of the player. It is arrogant garbage written by a charlatan trying to prove something about himself that he knows he is not worthy of claiming about himself anyway.

Another example of how that is apparent is in the writing for the protagonist’s dialogue. It is quite clearly the same personality of the writer without any imaginative quality that extends into different roles of personality, nor does it contain any particularly good lines. Most often it is embarrassingly immature at not recognizing the significance of situations, nor being able to express an entertaining and interesting point of view. It’s truly pathetic and an embarrassment for Bethesda that they allowed such poor writing into their game when there are a vast amount of skilled and talented writers out in the world who could have done a much better job.

While Shartfield is fun in gameplay at times considering the combat, crafting, looting, and adventuring, with my particular favorite being starship design, it is lazy in the most important areas which are story and purpose to make it worth playing.

The outpost design would be more interesting if there were more customization options, but maybe they will update that in future along with providing more starship design features, like being able to have multiple ships as a fleet going about autonomously and being productive. Also, it would be better if there were more romance options with the characters that are not involved with the Constellation crew, because as much as I want to like the Constellation crew, they always end up irritating me by saying pointless or judgmental things, and I don’t want them around. “What did your scanner pick up?” Why the fuck are you asking because it’s not like I can say anything to you and it’s pretty fucking obvious what the fuck I am doing by scanning plants and animals. There is nothing different about it ever.

That reminds me. The game would be better served if there was more scientific knowledge conveyed. More chemistry and biology written as facts for learning those sciences as applicable in a science fiction setting. Not just images, but explanations that are satisfactory to legitimate scientists of the profession. Do you not think children can understand those ideas? Or is it you who don’t understand them? When I was a child I recall other children my age being just as intelligent and capable of understanding as adults are today.

The only difference is the amount of experience a person has that begets wisdom and understanding about human life in the higher conceptual reality, as well as other adult concerns they simply will not be aware of until confronted by those situations. Science, history, and all forms of knowledge and learning are not adult concerns aside from how to effectively teach them. The youngest children should be able to access all knowledge available should they desire to learn.

Circumcision is not a concern either because it was resolved indefinitely a long time ago and people should be well aware of what the truth is about that resolution whether or not they accept the religious beliefs associated with it. The purpose of those religious beliefs are to make it easier for those to accept that truth when they are people who depend on religion for their thinking. The same people who mutilate children without their own conscience, mental faculties, or common sense being used to decide for themselves what is good or evil or whether or not they should do it.

Here is the problem with evil pursuit of knowledge: there is a power of divine presence which is supremely mystical and an authority above all else. This is a logical fact and an attainable experience common to many people. Though, its truth should be evident by it being maintained universally with such conviction for so long, unlike circumcision which is not universal and is an insult and defilement of what is sacred.

The way to access that ultimate divine power is through wisdom, service, benevolence, compassion, honor, and virtue. That is the only way, and it is not easy.

The evil method is accomplished with no effort and is very fast. Basically cheating the divine through theft and murder by use of treacherous malice and betrayal. Evil claims that by doing evil and pursuing divine truth in darkness a person can attain that same ultimate power of divine authority. That is a perversion of truth. You can in fact attain that power, but it is not the good end of it, it is the brutal wrath of condemnation and destruction that is received and that is not something a person wants or can use themselves. It helps nobody. Evil persons will say that power can be attained by evil means and it truly can be, but the complete truth is that it is the point of the sword that is attained when it destroys the evil doer, not the hilt that is used to enforce justice.

That is why that way is prohibited. Not because they want to keep you from something powerful that threatens their control, because there is no power in there for the seeker to receive that can help them or anyone. All of that power goes from the seeker of evil when they are rebuked and condemnedfor being evil. The power of self identity and existence passes from them, with that being the moment they are truly aware of it and thus receive it for the first time as the regret of losing it, into the hands of the deliverer who pursued truth in wisdom, humility, and compassion. Evil loses power by receiving power, and good receives power by giving power. Does that look familiar? You want to receive the power of the Kamehama Blast so much that you are willing to be evil to learn how to do it? Well here it is… Kaaaaa-meeeeeehhhhh-haaa—

It makes an entertaining story to describe that situation with various infernal elements of horror, but it is not all that mystical or complicated in reality. You want to meet God and receive God’s power? You can do it by being truly good and giving all your life to being good by practicing altruism, or you can do it by being truly evil and being totally destructive and villainous. The former rewards you with an enjoyable life and eternal satisfaction, the latter lands you in a prison cell for as long as you live and promises more imprisonment after you die whether or not you believe it to be possible, though you will certainly know it is possible if you are condemned as such. That is if you were not killed when justice smashes your face in for being an evil asshole.

The Julia Effect

Position a lovely maiden, particularly one with a good heart, near any man, and the ugliness of being male will no longer be repulsive unto the sight of a person’s eyes.

The Julia Effect is profoundly important in world saving matters. That’s because of how much human beings have descended into their carnal nature as to imperil the entire world with their foolishness and lack of ability to perceive higher orders of conceptual reality.

Situations like now, when I am egregiously oppressed by insane, malevolent tyrants with no sense to perceive the consequences of what their abuse of power has brought about. I have something very important to communicate to everyone for everyone’s benefit, but I cannot get a single person to value what I am communicating as what I am saying it is, because I am not a lovely maiden nor are there any who are ever near me. Not as friends, not as co-workers, not as students, not as public transit patrons, nothing. I am never anywhere near lovely maidens, and it has been like that for much of my adult life.

If it wasn’t obvious, I am in fact an ugly man. Not only an ugly man, but my manliness is off the charts and I’m the epitome of manliness. As a result, I am the ugliest of that which is ugly.

For the sake of the world, may a lovely maiden come to its rescue by being in close enough proximity to me to make me look good enough for people to listen to reason before they kill us all.

Further thoughts:

The ugliness of man is actually an evolutionary trait of survival. To human beings the greatest threat is other human beings, and ugliness keeps other human beings away. The threat is perceived in two ways: one, people, friends, groups, communities, all exchange personality and identity characteristics and nuances throughout their group which makes total individuality more difficult. Total individuality is important to survival because it is how to attain the mystical godhead of supreme power and authority. That power and authority is the saving grace of all humanity and the individual who attains it. The second threat is general maliciousness from other human beings who are covetous and envious for various hateful reasons and abuse their divine power of free will by using it for evil in ways that only human beings can be evil, such as what has been done through cyberspace for the sole purpose of harming me in the recent years.

So, the more manly a person becomes, the more ugly they become, and the more people are repulsed by the hideous nature of man’s innate grossness. At the same time, that is a protective trait against the maliciousness of evil doers because they can no longer remain anonymous when their are so few people around to hide among due to how repulsed people in general are. Those evil doers hide in anonymity because of their cowardice at the very thought of taking responsibility for their actions and are unwilling at all costs to face the consequences of what they have done for evil. Thus, the more manly a person becomes the more likely they are to attain the supreme mystical godhead of ultimate power and authority and ensure survival for themselves and anyone else with it.

This evolved grossability can be cultivated with general belligerence through frequent farting, burping, and other forms of gaseous release, such as through the arm pits. It is also enhanced with lack of grooming, lack of bathing, and a den that is arranged with dirty laundry, empty food containers, and various useless junk scattered around in a seemingly haphazard manner. The final key to male ugliness is intellectual immersement. The more you become a know-it-all, the more ugly you become.

It is somewhat dangerous to go too far into the ugliness, because a man should not ever disassociate entirely with the rest of civilization, and so certain routine practices of normal maintenance are acceptable, particularly those with long term effects, such as oral hygiene. You don’t want to skip that because although you can shower and get clean in one bath, freshen your laundry in one wash, and clean your den in one sweep, you cannot restore oral hygiene in one morning. Or can you? I don’t know. I don’t want to risk it because I’ve had enough bad experiences with dentists so that I want to avoid seeing them at all costs, even if it means regular brushing and occasional flossing.

The final aspect of man’s ugliness which is of note, is that while they become uglier and more isolated from others, they become closer to the natural world and eventually learn to commune with local flora and fauna. That is one of the greatest strengths of mankind’s ability because of its innumerable and undefinable applications.

Thus you see the paradox… for a man to achieve the supreme mystical godhead of total power and authority with which to save himself and the world, he must be unjustly rejected by all of humanity and forsaken to die outside of boundaries of normal human dignity. That rejection must happen unjustly. It cannot happen by doing evil because that would be too easy and negate all access to the supreme mystical godhead of total power and authority.

So when he finally achieves his goal and acquires that power, he cannot be readmitted into society because he has been forsaken beyond forgiveness, which all human beings are entitled to from one another. How can he then help his people survive the impending destruction they are yet ignorant of and he anticpated long ago?

There is only one hope for him and all of the world and humanity within it: the mercy of a lovely maiden. She must brave the distance between the boundaries of human dignity to meet him and vouch for him at the gates to bring him back. Maidens cannot ever be rejected in such a way. That is simply one of the facts of life, so they need never concern themselves with the trials of being beyond forgiveness.

This natural chain of events is also significant for the lovely maiden’s survival because she will need to demonstrate that maidens are good for more than just beautiful and good to look at. That’s because they will not be understood as capable of thought or action and treated as objects of sexuality and reproduction only and not appreciated for their unique maidenly thoughts and ideas that men do not have. It’s a grave situation indeed. Maidens demonstrate their higher nature in such lawless and depraved situations of a perverse civilization by recognizing the danger that imperils everything, the hope attained by the forsaken man, and how she can help. Those are all higher concepts of reality than carnal perception.

There is no salvation without a maiden as the man’s counterpart. This relationship cannot be with a daughter, sister, or mother because of the intimacy of the harmony of balance required. Marriage is most appropriate to describe what that relationship is like, though that is not a requirement, nor am I inclined to believe that any sexual intimacy is required because the nature of true love is not bodily. It is the soul of a maiden and the soul of a man uniting as a single force of goodness only achievable by a maiden and man cooperating selflessly through truth and love.

Maiden and man are each one half of the fullness of humanity, with the unseen third being the spirit of divinity throughout and within all of creation. Because that spirit also interconnects nature and humanity, it often has personality and various forms of identity because of the human contribution to its form. That is normal and is an aspect of all marriages.

Although the man and maiden in this world saving situation stand apart from everyone else as individuals, their actions demonstrate the general nature of marriage and true love that all people experience. It is not ever so extreme, nor should people ever have to endure such suffering on account of the apathy of others who have imperiled everyone's lives with their carnal perversity, moral laziness, and evil use of free will. However, the goodness of that marriage of the supreme mystical godhead of total power and authority which is man’s with the supremely divine loveliness of maidenly maidenliness which is the source of all good making life worth living— that goodness attained by the union of those two most significant forces of all creation and existence, is attainable by all people who marry for true love.

Furthermore, that goodness is attained without the need for the suffering and pain the man experienced in fullness, and the maiden experienced enough of to know what it is. Nobody needs that pain and suffering, nor should they seek it. There are other forms of pain and suffering which are useful and good, but that one… do not go there. Do not seek it. It is not power, it is not glory, it is not goodness. It is more dangerous and life threatening to the mortal human body than anything else.

It went like this: there is a national agent either mercenary or formally employed who used his station to pursue me with a kind of rabid madness and viciousness of a diseased dog in need of euthanasia. Their determination to do evil, passion to cause suffering, hatred for love, and perverse desires for defilement of his own soul was so convincing that people assumed he was onto something, however he was simply pure evil of intent and never had justification that was real. Each accusation, attempt to prosecute, method of oppression, and violation of humanity was done for an imagined reason of evil he himself desired. I certainly did not want to be so hated by everyone and rejected by all society to end up like Jesus crucified on a cross, because that is the stupidest thing a person can do, but I had no other morally good choice, so I accepted it.

Thus I ended up beyond the borders of human dignity where crucifixions happen and the most reviled people go to die as hated outcasts unfit for humanity. The worst criminals go there to die for the most abhorrent crimes. However, I did no such crime, nor did I do any of those sins which the enemy to all life accused me of, and my condemnation was entirely unjust. Things would not have been so bad if that person stopped at the border of dignity and went no further, but their hatred was such that they too pressed into the outer darkness of perfect chaos where none can survive without divine intervention.

As a result, the time will come when justice is served and I will be admitted back into the rightful place of all human beings, and that pitful fool will not. No matter what human beings may decide as that inhuman criminal’s fate, the spiritual reality will forbid them from reentry, and they will go on doing whatever they want to no avail until they eventually die, and nobody will care but them. In life they were totally selfish, so to in death they are totally selfish.

It’s not my fault they did that to themselves, nor is their fate my judgment, and I do not have the power to change that. That is simply the nature of reality and why it is stupid for humans to be evil. Evil, even from a single person, may cause the disintegration of all of humanity, and through humanity all of creation. If that person, and it is always a person, who is responsible for doing the evil is not checked, held accountable to law and order, and justice dealt to them, which is the only way to save them from their fate, they can go so far that it causes a breach in the security of divine providence that protects human beings.

All of that person’s associates, supervisors, underlings, and everyone else who was aware of what they were doing are the ones responsible for what will happen to him because they did not intervene to prevent him from doing more and more evil when they were fully aware of what was happening. If they don’t learn from what happens as that fool is punished, they too will follow that person out there. He will certainly be wanting them to as well, promising all manner of lies and deceits trying to tempt them into making an irrevocable mistake simply to enjoy the suffering of others to distract him from the pain and suffering he will personally be experiencing.

In effect as it pertains to humanity in general, this is nothing new and is of no consequence to us. It equates to just another wretched evil spirit being wretched and evil. A demon who was once a man but who gave away his humanity to be a creature of hatred devoid of love, except particularly spiteful because they will be forever tormented and reviled in Hell by the denizens there. Even Hell was in danger from that man’s foolishness, and the happiness that is enjoyed there was threatened. That happiness, however much people may turn their noses up at it, is perhaps more precious than happiness anywhere else because of the suffering those in Hell also experience. Do not let be fooled into following after a man toward evil. Never let anyone convince you there is a reason to do evil, because there is never reason for evil.

That breach in divine providence that the evil man caused allows the darkness of perfect chaos to flow unabated into creation. That is ultimate destruction because it increases and inceases and increases in constantly more destructive ways until all has been broken and destroyed in the decay of divine entropy. By the end, there will not even be a single union of two individual parts. Not mind and body, not spirit and soul, not person and self, not life and death, not truth and love, not good and order, not proton and neutron, nothing will be anything other than metaphysical dust, and not a person will be left to even know what happened.

The hope is this: there is a patch there to prevent the unabated flow. It is not permanent. It needs permanent attention as soon as possible, but it will hold as long as necessary to do that. That is not an excuse to delay for a single second when action is necessary, because those delays are the waste of time that could result in the breach reopening and annihilation being certain.

If humanity strayed in apathy and degenerate perversity of their higher selves to such an extent as to allow a sin of such magnitude to occur that all of humanity is now in danger of destruction, they will fail again if allowed to. The good people must not let the foolish people who choose evil to fail. They must use the law to hold them accountable, either as a rod of delivering wrath, or a rod to measure and deliver mercy. That is the best you can do for such evil fools who give away their humanity. Punish them in accordance with the law and respect the gravity of their choice to do evil with the most severe response of justice because of the danger they put everyone in by doing so.

The flaw of the coder clique

There is a gang of… wannabe professionals in the video game industry who learned a few tricks that are nothing more than the equivalent of a foreign language for machines. That language has no emotion, no passion, no abstract concepts, no conceptual complexity, no higher truth. It is extremely mundane but still a language of its own that requires learning and study to interpret.

Those people fancy themselves superiors to others in society for knowing something that other people do not, and they try their best to lord that over their patrons by incorporating features in games that are only accessible to people who know that language. I don’t want to be playing an unfair game like that against cheaters who don’t have any sense of decent gameplay.

So they use a different language and think it is great, and I respect people who are fluent in foreign languages, but not those who know coding. The coding community has proven themselves to be toxic, hateful, and unproductive with their form of skilled labor, and are entirely unhelpful to humanity. That is one reason, but the main one is that they cannot communicate a single thing with coding. They can say nothing. They have no facts. No opinions. No truth. They have nothing at all to say. I do not respect people who know coding the same way I respect people who know human languages.

The people who use coding are mean spirited, cruel, criminal, and hostile to human life. They are a wretched group of humans that are a plague to humanity. At least until there are some laws established that provide protections from their hateful hostility. Coding is a waste of time for my purposes and goals, and I won’t bother learning it because it does not interest me.

Better to learn Japanese or Spanish than coding. At least then you can communicate with human beings and express concepts of value, such as love, compassion, and friendship.

If those data parasites making a living off of other people’s information through hacking and invasions of privacy cannot enter the light and say who they are and what they do, identifying themselves in the profession that they claim to have, they are criminals and they need to be put in prison and prevented from accessing electronic technology. All forms of professional work needs to be publicly accounted for in civilization. All of it. There are no secret jobs. Not a single one. If people are found to be running an industry in the shadows without the public awareness, especially when they are profiting off of the public, they are a threat to all of civilization.

Part of humans coming together as a community means having a public identity and a private identity. The public identity is the one that is taxed, signs forms, votes, goes to the market, works a job, visits church, goes to school, etc. It is the one you have that is accountable to the society you live in. If you commit crimes, display dishonorable behavior, or other such reputation damaging things, those are accounted for both by civil authority and social authority. Civil authority throws you in jail or rewards you with money. Social authority insults you or praises you.

A person’s private life is sacred. That is between them and the highest divine, and only them and the highest divine. National security, mercenary hackers, corporate leeches, etc. do not have the right to pry into the private lives of people. It is rude for one, but it is also criminal. Consider all the things in life that are immaterial and have boundaries. Sexual harassment is a good example. A person harasses another person when they insert themselves into the other person’s intimate private space either physically or verbally and without consent.

The entire human person has boundaries like that which we respect. Bathroom privacy, bedroom privacy, and private property in general. A person has PERSONAL SPACE! Just because you are physically elsewhere, when you project yourself through technology into another person’s apartment by hacking into their personal device, you are invading their privacy and breaking and entering. That kind of crime needs to be punished severely until people learn to respect technology and start using it for good.

An independent citizen has the privilege of being as anonymous as they wish to be as long as they abide by the law and general human decency by not abusing new technology not yet accounted for by the legal system. A public person, like a politician, or member of the nobility in societies with a royal class, or a cleric, are much more limited in their privileges of anonymity. That’s because those social roles are representative of a large amount of people, and their roles are specifically designated as a service to the public. That is why they are held more accountable and if they have a problem with that, they should not be trying to stand in the spot light, get on stage, or be famous, because it’s not up to them whether or not they are scrutinized by the public. If they are unwilling to be scrutinized, the public has all the more reason to suspect them of ill-will, malicious behavior, crimes, and all that is hostile to civilization.

That is absolutely true, and all people of public noteriety should be maintaining lives at least at the normal standard they expect of citizens and be willing to be scrutinized at an any time. That’s not a reason to do it with hostility or perversely but if they are being shady and evading answering questions about a problem or crime they are involved in, that is reasonable suspicion to arrest them as a suspect for that crime, and no amount of money or reputation is allowed to change that, and if it does, the people who allowed it to happen became complicit in the crime.

You can be upset about the scrutiny, like I have been for seven long years, but I did not fight it because I have nothing to hide. Who then ordered the scrutiny of my life, and why has it been so intense, perverse, and hostile? Who is responsible for that? I am a public person as a cleric and entertainer, yes, but I am not given any respect of either or those. I don’t even get tips for my work! It’s not like I can hire my own team of agents to defend me from the hordes of hired mercenaries and criminal rich who are behind it. So what the fuck is reason? I am not going to disappear from public life, and I demand an apology for what has happened, and an explanation.

Obviously it infuriates me, and it would be a problem if I wasn’t enraged by it all. I am a human being, a citizen, a veteran, a cleric, and an artist, and I am disabled, hated, attacked at all times, and never given any useful help. I deserve better after all that I have done for everyone and I am not going to let it go until something happens to change what has been tolerated for too long and without justification.

Would that these attacks were physical! It would be much easier for me to handle, less torturous, and resolved faster because I would have a pile of corpses in my wake. You would not be able to ignore that for as long as you have ignored me for using words and leaving a pile of non-bodilty corpses in my wake, some of them as colossal as corporations, nations, and all the fanciful imaginary false idols people wanted to value as more important than my human person in real life. If you put those before me, I will cut them down no matter how big, small, powerful, or weak. I will not spare a single false idol between me and my real life person. My favorite kill being Jesus the Christ. That was the most satisfying, but I will happily kill more and more and more until nobody has anything left to believe in except me, if that’s what it takes to survive.

It is insanely beautiful chaos to me. On the one hand the pain and suffering is worse than anything I imagined or could prepare for, and on the other hand, the glory of victorious battle and the countless slain enemies is one of the most amazing pleasures I could ask for out of existence. I will fight to my last breath or until there is nothing left for me to fight for. I will not stop, not even when I sleep, and I will never tire of it. My patience is eternal because my wrath is eternal, and they both happen at the same time. Nobody will be safe from my reach because of how this battle is fought, if that isn’t clear enough already with all that has changed as a result of my will and word and way alone.

Naturally Natural Holmes

I don’t always drink alcohol, but when I do, I’ll drink any kind of booze.

You’ve got me all wrong, if that’s what you think! I’m too school for cool, not the other way around.

And last, but not least, because I don’t like keeping any secrets, and I have decided to reveal the great mystery of how I did it all.

Keeping secrets should be kept to a minimum, especially with national governments. Every government secret does more harm to the integrity of the nation than the possibility of a threat could ever do. Especially secrets that are “forbidden knowledge and truth” no matter what the fuck it is they think they know, because one, they don’t know how to tie their shoes or use the bathroom without help let alone read an adult book, and two, there is no such thing as dangerous knowledge or information. By being hostile to knowledge and information you “throw out the baby with the bathwater” so to speak. The government needs to be more on its game than to be willing to just eliminate an entire resource, because all information suffers when you make select things forbidden. Why are they so afraid of other people? That’s what I don’t understand. Is it because of the kind of people they are?

They should not be leading if they are going to be so fearful and cowardly as to be tyrants trying to control everything because they can’t cope with unpredictability in life. If they don’t know what to do with a curveball in the major leagues, they don’t need to be getting paid major league salaries. The USA government needs to be more open about what they do because their purpose is not complicated, it is clearly defined, nor does it require secrecy. Most importantly, they have proven with the reason they fail as a government that they cannot handle the responsibility of keeping secrets because they have poor judgement, lack of total subordination by the definition and spirit of their doctrine, nor do they adhere to any laws that restrict what they do in secrecy.

Slaves to Evil

Consider the USA government at this time. They resist doing what is right, good, and true with all the fiber of their being, believing themselves that doing so is what is truly good.

They are slaves to evil because they do not think nor see.

Look at the evil that they do with their actions. Not only the evil that it is meant to do, but the evil by how they betray the law and order of the authority who grants them power. Look at how they betray the very spirit of the doctrine of their own justice in addition to the words it says.

They do not see what they do because they do not want to see it. They imagine it is something else and deny reality. In other words, hallucinations, delusions, and mental aberrations that are dangerous in roles of national security such as they have.

They do not think about what they do because they cannot conceive of the consequences of their actions. What is even worse is that they cannot conceive of why they think they are doing good. That isn’t too much of surprise because they are obviously evil and hostile to all life and in no way good, but that doesn’t seem to trouble them. The fact that they cannot find even the most flimsy justification for their actions is of no concern to them because justice doesn’t exist to evil. Lawlessness does not care for reason, law, order, written doctrine, or intelligence. They simply do what they think their body wants as if they did not have a human mind or soul and were nothing more than a beast of lower intellect. A beast that can communicate with humans but does not think like one. A beast that can blend in with humans, but does not feel what it is like to be one.

Having given up their souls and free will to obey the commands of fools and tyrants without question, they have become slaves beneath the dignity human nature.

There is no order I would not under any circumstances disobey. There is no secret I would not under any circumcstances reveal.

No oath can command a person to do what is evil or wrong and still be binding. The reason for that is because the very authority of an oath demands goodness and truth. That is what it means to swear in such a sacred way. If a tyrant slithers into the position of commanding those obedient to their duty, and they think they can use people however they wish with no regard for the authority of the oath they are abusing, they release all who were under oath from its obligation. Those are dangerous times because all men become an authority and judge unto themselves, and not everyone is suited to do so.

So when you swear an oath to never reveal a secret and always do what is commanded, the nature of swearing an oath implies that the fealty does not extend to evil nor doing that which would imperil one’s own soul by doing evil. Such things go without saying because saying them are an insult and degrade the grace of the occasion, but since such things are abused by tyrants, perhaps they should be included now because human beings haven’t learned anything in all the years that that they’ve ever made a sacred promise.

In short, no military commander or national leader has the authority to command his or her subjects to do what is evil. Never do they have that authority. The source of the orders given at all times must understand the fullness of what they are commanding their subjects to do, and be able to explain it with adequate use of reason. That is what it means to not do evil. You know why something is unpleasant, but also why it needs to be done because of the good of the long term results, and can qualify the value of the cost and the value of the gain to prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is the correct course of action.

Normally those things should not be questioned in the heat of the moment, but if they are, they must be ready to answer at the apropriate time. There may be no time to explain all that when lives are at stake, so they record the confrontation, relieve the objector from duty, do what must be done, and then when there is time, confront the situation appropriately with the explanation that is required to justify what was done.

Loyalty is a vitally important value for any leader or authority, but not the loyalty of their subjects to them; the loyalty of the leader to their subjects. That is the most important quality of loyalty in any situation where it is concerned, and if a leader ever proves to act with evil, or in ways that are not in the interest of their subjects, they betray the loyalty they are oathbound to uphold. Accepting an oath makes you just as responsible for its fulfillment as swearing it, and that is why every citizen in the USA is responsible for holding the government accountable for its betrayal, corruption, and lawlessness.

The citizens are the receivers of the oath, and the government employees are the swearers. We cannot allow them to get away with breaking their oath to us for their own good. That is our promise to them as the authority of the USA that grants authority to the government. The reason the receiver of the oath has the highest obligation of loyalty is because they have the most understanding and wisdom of the situation at hand, and the subjects usually do not perceive all that is relevant. The USA government for example does not perceive all that is relevant because they are restrained in their lives by being in service. They do not have the freedom of a citizen who is not in government service, and they do not understand sll that freedom entails while they are in service because they cannot experience it. If they spend their entire lives in such service they may lose all recollection of what life is like with freedom and assume that their limited freedom is the standard for all citizens.

The national government officials think too much of themselves, as though I am not aware of the international situation, economic concerns, and military threats worldwide. I am aware because I understand cultural movements, human nature, and how all conflicts of ideology can be resolved, and even though that is enough, I can read the unseen details of the situation just by looking at it. I notice things that I generally don’t tell people about because it’s not my place to judge them. It is my place to judge the government officials however, because they are my subjects and my servants and I see the dirt of corruption they are trying to hide, can smell the aroma of chemicals they used to cover it up, and can read the expressions on their faces with much more clarity than can be expressed in words. However important those government charlatans think their secular affairs are, they are entirely trivial in relation to the higher purpose of why any nation has authority in the first place. It does not matter how complex their situation is if it is proven to be for an evil purpose.

They have demonstrated their evil intentions with disloyalty, lawlessness, and criminal acts of the worst kind in the presence of the public and via international media broadcast around the entire world. Those acts of dishonor, inhumanity, and self-destruction reveal that the USA government employees are working for an evil purpose. Any evil purpose or method are contrary to the greater good no matter what it is that they are doing or think they are doing it for.

That is a simple logical fact of truth. It is not naive. It is not ignorance. It is not faith. It is logical truth about reality, and a conclusion that is arrived at by critical thinking similar to the scientific method. The only difference being that the experimenting is done with the imagination using immaterial concepts found only within the realm of consciousness. Those concepts are not quantifiable. They can be qualified though, and the most basic qualities they can be identified with are good or evil.

As employees in government service restrained by their obligations and duty, they cannot experience the fullness of freedom. Thus they cannot know the greater good beyond the limits they are restrained. That is why they must adhere to the words and spirit of the law they swore to us they would adhere to and trust the authority that commands them with unwaivering obedience, and if they have a question to voice it so it can be addressed. They were not forced into government service, and government service does not restrain a person’s freedom to cause them suffering or oppress them. It is for the greater good because of the competence, reliability, and consistency that is required in matters of such importance as they are assigned.

Them thinking their evil which costs everyone everything is in fact naive. They are fools for thinking that, and they arrive at that conclusion because they are mystified by the spiritual nature of Christian truth. Very naive and foolish of them specifically because most of them are elderly! It is an embarassment for adults of such an age to be so immature in mind, morality, and spirit. It is a total disgrace to humanity and everyone’s shame to see the squandered life of a person when they grow old and have no wisdom.

Even worse if those people are government officials for all the world to see as representatives of an entire nation founded specifically for a higher intellectual purpose than what is evident in natural phenomena. Meaning you cannot understand that higher purpose if all you consider is natural phenomena, which is why critical thinking about immaterial concepts of consciousness is so important in life at all times. Humanity cannot rely on science and survive because science does not have the capacity to examine what it needs to arrive at the conclusions necessary for human ingenuity.

I went a little more in depth than my intial purpose, and I want to reiterate that now in case you were mystified again by where this led. Oaths cannot remain binding if their command is for an evil purpose, with evil methods, or the command achieved by evil means. Nothing evil can bind that which is good.

Footnote: I am not disparaging science here. Its strength is that it does not ascend to that level of spiritual reality within the domain of consciousness. By adhering to natural phenomena as a principle, so that science requires quantification and recordable observations, scientists are able to innovate nature in ingenious ways. That is highly important for our survival, but that alone is not enough. We also need to know what is good and what is evil and why it is important, and the knowledge necessary for those facts transcends natural reality. Scientific facts correspond to this with what they reveal about nature on an atomic level and beyond. You can study both science and theology, and they do not conflict, but the methods of one do not apply the same way for the other and you simply need to know when to use what.

They are like warlocks and mages. They both do magic, and maybe can cast some of the same spells, but how they do magic is very different. If you don’t know how cell phones or computers are constructed to work the way they do, is that not basically magic for all intents and purposes? How does what you say on a cell phone go through the air invisibly to the other phone? It’s one thing to know the names of the parts and what the process is called, it’s another to conceive of what is happening when they work. I do understand and it still feels like magic to me. That has not disappeared since I learned how they work.

Evil is always false, Love is always true


My name’s V, and I endorse this message because Corpo evil is a result of Jews corrupting Christianity and having no respect for law and order in the USA where we reject monarchs and rule by democracy with freedom and liberty above all forms of tyranny. In other words, it’s common sense why I’m putting a bullet through your head, and it’s your fault for not understanding because that was a decision you made by convincing yourself that you could outsmart the common people. (that there is the Matrix power of slowing down time between the shot fired to answer the question my enemy wanted to ask before I even gave him a chance. This is then speeding up time because as much as I want to see a bullet dig slowly into a person’s head out of curiosity to watch the chaos of destruction in slow-mo, since he can’t move fast or think fast enough to get out of the way, I wouldn’t want that done to me since he is fully aware that he can’t get out of the way in time and it would hurt slowly. So, let’s just do it the natural way with Newton’s laws in full effect, and then maybe watch a highlight reel later.)


This excerpt from a chain of comments on IGN’s site is pretty memorable, so I want to include it here in case they ban my account there too.


evil is always false, lies, and wrong. It is never true, because that would require it to be love, and evil is the antithesis of love. Evil hates love and its only desire is to destroy love, which is why coveting is wrong because it is the root of all evil when muties want my hot Gentile wives because they are happier with life and it makes them more beautiful than the muties could ever possibly do because mutilation results in unhappiness. So if you have two doors, one is pure evil and the other is pure good, and you can ask them one question each, how do you know which one to go through? Ask them both if you should use the other door.

Share

  • xxDoubleDaisyxx

    27 minutes ago

    Replying to xxDoubleDaisyxx

    Do not go through the Christ door. Do not use it. It is a trap and a trick no matter how you think about it or use it. Even though Jesus was a man and demonstrated good, men are never pure good or pure evil, so if he was one with the highest divine, who is pure good, then that means Jesus was good as a human creature but gave all of that goodness away to be pure evil as a person which is the very reason why he died. Evil is a human creation, not anything of the highest divine. Humans create evil, not God. Therefore, if Jesus is the epitome Jews as the Jews claimed when they crucified him, then the Jews are pure evil. So, do not use the Christ door. Reject all that is Jewish because all that is Jewish is sourced from evil, and the word Christ became synonymous with a Jew, even though it was originally a Gentile word about a Gentile hero. The word "Christ" does not have the same meaning now as it did when it was written into scripture. that's enough, but newspeak: resurrection=new body=non-Jew=parousia promise of new bodies for those who die with and in Christ=because they know not what they do. (obviously I am not pure good or pure evil because I am a human creature and an individual person named Nick Bylotas and I am aware of evil which is enough to not be pure good and why evil can possibly exist. For that same reason I definitely have some good in me, and it is that good which is true about my identity).

    Reply

    Share

    • xxDoubleDaisyxx

      16 minutes ago

      Replying to xxDoubleDaisyxx

      I call this victory dance the bone stomp. What's that rule of the game when one team can't help but run up the score and they speed up the clock to get it over with? Right... it's called the "Mercy Rule". Not mandatory, but if both coaches agree to it, they can choose to keep running the clock through all normal stops. Are you sure you don't want to enact it Coach Christ? As the coach of my team Team DoubleDaisy (and an actual football coach in real life) that offer is still on the table because your boys out there don't even look like they want to try anymore and it is embarrassing you more than it is them. They shouldn't be playing if they don't want to and you insult the entire game by being a slave driver.

      Reply

      Share

      • xxDoubleDaisyxx

        4 minutes ago

        Replying to xxDoubleDaisyxx

        now that I think about it, that dude is the best part of that game. He wasn't intended to be a Non-Jew, Non-Christian, Gentile like me though, was he? Mixing up that truth is the biggest mistake a storyteller can make (and why God of War Rag. was garbage too). If that wasn't obvious to you from the get go, you should never have been allowed to the table where storytellers work. Let me guess, they used gunpoint against non-violent artists to get you there. To think you would even want to be associated with that kind of maneuver anywhere, let alone the USA, instead of being in open rebellion and willing to die before you misled people with evil! At least Jesus was willing to die, and under the most excruciating scenario at the time too! You probably wouldn't be willing to take a punch to the face, let alone a crown of thorns or a sharp wit. You must be one of the most disgusting, disgraceful, and horrible people to ever defile a human creature with your Self. I am glad I don't know who you are, and I hope I never do. May you be locked in a dark hole for the rest of your life imprisoned under constant guard, and never be seen or heard from again.

I don’t think there is a problem with wanting as much good as is possible to have, but there is a difference between that and coveting the goodness that other people have acquired when they have a ridiculous amount of goodness in their vault. That goodness gets so ridiculously abundant in material things for those people who remain good because once a human person fills up their vault of immaterial goodness, the overflow turns into material goodness. Now before you get ahead of yourself and tire yourself out with too much work and not enough planning, I just want to remind you that the conversion rate is like energy to matter. It takes a lot of goodness if you want it to turn into a small amount of money. Better to not count quantity at all if you are thinking about returns past your immaterial vault and haven’t filled that yet.

However, no matter your progress, a good method is to make an effort to be in the right place at the right time by consistently practicing attuning your energy to be in harmony with the natural flow of goodness (See the Law of Attraction, The Secret, and A New Earth for some popular reading on this subject). If you do that enough, you will start to notice how things come and go in a form of benevolent chaos and will start to get a feel for how things flow at your place in time. Then, when a big prize comes your way, because you are near the flow where big prizes move through, you are in a good spot to take a shot at it and claim a big score. You probably wouldn’t want to be directly in the big flow, because that is a strong current that can easily sweep a person away or turn them into a big shark’s second breakfast without any warning at all.

Last thing, consider the conversion rate once more. If you spend all your time working toward filling your material vault in the world of real life, but neglect your immaterial vault of virtuous “treasure in heaven”, then should a moral tax come along, all of that material treasure might be consumed to just pay a tiny amount of what you owe for something you were supposed to have depending on what it is for. For a president who commits treason in public and all the politicians expect us to trust they have a good reason for protecting him without giving us that reason, then that moral tax is actually quite substantial, because you can’t hide from the king or the king’s men when they come to collect.

“I see you bought yourself my own palace while I was on a routine health inspection of the brothels. Well, I don’t want to insult my own court and assume that you did that unjustly since the court of high judges seem to be okay with it and I want to believe they embody justice at the standard necessary for their station before I examine them personally. Nor is it my job to handle all the legal paperwork to ensure such actions are done justly and in accordance with the law, but something doesn’t add up.

“You see, I took out all of my treasury before visiting the brothels, so if you had paid the tax, there should be something in there with at least what you paid. I’m guessing you just forgot. No problem. You can pay it now that you are here on your hands and knees begging to do anything to save yourself.

“Let’s see… what’s the tax on the kingdom of heaven? Last time it was paid with crucifixion, but that was 2,000 years ago, and with inflation and general increases in costs of living, that’s going to end up equal to…. just about the same thing. So, because crucifixion is insane and evil and those barbaric practices were outlawed a long time ago, let’s say life in prison, citizenship revoked, and loss of all assets, including my palace you think you just bought.

“Or did you think the magic sword was broken when you discarded it because it wouldn’t work for you and that you could stop me with my own army istead when I came back? Did you not know that I used this same sword to defeat thousands of armies single handedly and enjoy doing so as well? Or perhaps you simply didn’t have faith in me being true to my word. Now, how will you be paying, with your life, or your death? “

There is not enough sex in the world

Ironic isn’t it? It seems most people would say that the sex is off the charts. That it is worse than it has ever been before.

Not so. That is why I am cranking the sexy up past the limiters.

There is not enough sex because there is none available for me. I cannot find a single sexual partner that I find agreeable. Not a one! I am not particularly picky either. It is like there is a wall built around me by people who want to prevent others from having sex with me at all costs. That sounds ludicrous, I know, but sex is inaccessible to me, and that is the simple fact of the matter.

I am astounded when I read things where people are shocked that someone is not having sex regularly with someone else, as if it is a social injustice. I don’t know what to do about it. I am one of the most sexually liberated, sexually free, and open people in the entire universe when it comes to sexuality, and not a single person is available to me.

That is why there is not enough sex in the world.

There is a small amount of people who I do not find agreeable for sex and those are homosexual masculine men. Hairy, muscular men are repulsive and even though I get a few of them every now and then wanting to fuck me, I do not find that agreeable. It does not appeal to me. Everything else! Literally everything else is open! I don’t care about race, beauty, social status, kinks, gender, or any of that. Yet, it is unavailable and I cannot find a sexual partner to save my life.

I have tried getting off with a masculine person, but it does not work. I do not find it arousing.

I think there is something unusual about this predicament, because I am passable from an objective point of view. Meaning I am not particularly ugly, out of shape, my dick is decent size, I am polite and respectful to people I meet, and I have a particularly powerful life situation that is the envy of billionaires and the ideal of homelessness. I own my own business, have unlimited money at my disposal, totally unconfined by schedules with free time 24/7, and am willing, if not eager, to perform exceptional oral pleasure if for no other reason because it is pleasurable for me to do so! All these things imply that I should be able to find a sexual partner with at least the normal amount of availability.

I tend to go several years without sex at a time, and not because of lack of effort. Those encounters are only brief rendezvous of a few days that seem to just happen out of sheer mercy from the divine because of lucky circumstances that put a horny girl next to me at the right place and time. I don’t even know how to communicate with women in a normal social context. Ignoring the fact that multiple major social media companies designed to facilitate human interactions in society permanently banning my individual person from accessing their services, two of them specifically for dating, I very seldom get a response back from other apps that appear to allow me to communicate with others. Even when I am paying a prostitute to talk to me, she goes cold and the line goes dead mid-conversation and I never get a response.

Thanks, Ms. Vespoli. I thought you actually wanted to read my response, considering that I was paying a substantial amount of money just to send it to answer a question you asked. What a ruthless, impolite, disgraceful cunt. The shame of all whores she is.

There is something wrong with the world. Why is someone like me, who is most willing, universally compatible, above average standards, and with the most favorable situation for sexual activity possible, unable to access any sexual partners?

It is like there are some nefarious scoundrels who have made it their business to interfere in my personal life as antagonists and thus have built a wall of social isolation around me in order to prevent me from having any social contact with eligible romantic partners. I do not believe they do so out of an ideal for celibacy because I am fairly certain they are as lewd and sexually perverse as anyone else in a social sense, with multiple sexual partners available to them at any time. So, why should they want to prevent me, who has zero available, from finding a single one?

If this mystery should ever be solved and proves to be similar to the sin of David the Betrayer, then I hope I can bring down the most vengeful wrath of divine justice to subject them to the most severe and brutal punishment that is admissible in a court of law, and then do worse with what is admissible in the court of the high heavens.

That remains to be seen when the mystery is revealed and the case broken.

Before you rotten hypocrites accuse me of having my priorities out of order, bite your tongues. An unlimited amount of money is not going to solve a single problem in the entire world. It will not do anything. If money was of any use, it would be useful, but how much use are the most rich nations in the world to humanity? They seem highly inefficient and incapable if you ask me.

No, you do not need anything from my unlimited stores of money. You need my ideas, my solutions, my plans, my words, my stories, and my discoveries. You need the religion I founded. You need the spiritual discoveries I have pioneered. You need my sense of justice and legal intuition to put the most vile criminals in prison according to the highest written laws in the land that are being ignored. You need all that. Not money.

So why don’t you accept what I offer before you demand more, if you think you would judge me for being unworthy as your savior? You would reject me but not even attempt to do what I recommend or accept the solutions I offer? You wretched fools have no desire to make the world a better place. You have no desire to help humanity. You have no desire for intellectual progress, and advancing civilization. You are ingrates and beasts that do not know dung from donuts. Had you any of those motivating factors in yourselves, you would attempt to work with me, not fail miserably with your futile efforts to suppress me and shut me down. All the power that you waste failing to deter me from my goals would be better spent doing literally anything else.

I would never use my power to strike down those insufferable ingrates and tyrants! They are not worth it. That would be a total waste of energy. Doing so would not only take away the good that power does, but the use of it would be expended in a pointless, non-productive purpose to thwart fools who are more easily destroyed by systematic justice doing what it is designed to do in order to save people like me the time and effort of getting personally involved. In other words, using my power to cater to those idiots by thwarting their antagonism would be casting pearls before swine, and I know better.

Less is not more

Whoever the fuck said “less is more” should have been executed on the spot for being the stupidest piece of shit to ever mislead humanity with false statements. May they burn in Hell for all eternity suffering the worst pains of the most condemned.

Banish that accursed lying statement of untruth from your mind and start thinking in a properly ordered fashion, you idiotic shit sucking scum.

Now fuck off and go kill yourself if you are evil minded or if you believe such things as “less is more”.

I have no patience for liars of that kind. They profess foolishness as though it were wisdom and it is an abomination. If it were a joke of a statement it would be different, but that accursed phrase is uttered as though it should be a proverb and it is pure evil considering why it is said, the origin of the idea, and all that such ill-conceived logic born from incompatible concepts as though they were logically synonymous has caused.

Should you ever hear that phrase I expect you to respond with an excessively severe rebuke to traumatize the minds of those who said it so they never forget the lesson you taught them.

A modern explanation of the Jesus' washing his disciples' feet

A king has an unwritten social contract between his domain and himself. As the monarch the people trust him to rule effectively and benevolently and ensure they are provided for and protected from the threats of other nations and territories. In so doing the king is permitted to use violence according to his own judgment as a means of accomplishing that task.

When any person uses violence to achieve a goal, they descend to the lowest nature of the human being. That is the most base, primal, beast-like form of our existence in total expression of self without the mind. It is all animal commanded by a human purpose. For human standards violence should never be tolerated and avoided at all costs, and all conflicts should be resolved with language instead. If language fails, it is a failure of the people communicating, who have proven themselves inadequate as leaders on one side or the other or both sides.

As a result of human failure when they resort to sub human behavior of violence to achieve their goals, they come to the instinctual and stupid conclusion that because violence can silence a person’s ability to use language by ending their life it is superior to language as a form of power. It doesn’t take much intelligence to see how backwards and inhuman those conclusions of bestial humans are. However, when confronted with such fools it may be required to answer with violence, because it remains a part of human nature even if it is rejected as a means of resolving human conflict unless the situation makes non-violence impossible for the defense of one’s own life and those under their protection.

That is why a king is trusted by his citizens to employ violence while the citizens reject violence as a means of solving problems. If they use violence they generally are arrested by the king’s authorities and submitted to justice at court in which case the king or the king’s representative determine whether or not the person who used violence was acting with the king’s wisdom, which extends to all subjects as one of the benefits of a kingship. If the king wanted violence to be used it would not be against the law, but kings have the authority to judge matters outside of defined parameters according to their wisdom, because defined parameters of law are always inadequate.

Kings can be held accountable to those judgments if the wisdom of a man who is not a king proves them foolish, and thus the king must submit to his own justice in order to maintain order and retain his authority. If he defies his own justice, then the citizens have no reason to accept his justice because he does not accept it himself and it is therefore unacceptable all around.

So, knowing now that violence is beneath the dignity of human standards, a king employs violence as a servant underneath the dignity of the common man. They “wash the feet” of their servants in these situations. The use of violence does not make them greater. It makes them lesser, and they do so knowingly as a form of humility. The violence is not what gives them authority over the people, it is the wisdom they demonstrate. Wisdom is humble with power. It does not degrade those who receive its force. It uplifts them. It does not lower the common man, it raises him. This can either be in a form of “tough love” or “soft love” so to speak.

In conclusion, when a king goes to war, they do what Jesus did at the Last Supper by removing his cloak and tunic, tying a towel about his waist as the lowest, most humble servant who is half naked and may be performing services that people do not want to talk about because they are private matters that only trusted servants are in their confidence to engage in. Feet are a common metaphor for sexuality in storytelling if you are unaware. In any case, the king descends to a lower level of dignity and in effect, lowers the standard, which is why his subjects may join him in acts of violence as long as he retains his authority as the king. When the war is won, the violence is ended and people are no longer permitted to use it because the king once again raises to the base standard of dignity which all subjects receive.

In any case, violence and sex are on the same level as beneath the standard of human dignity. That’s why it is frowned upon to be fucking in public places unless it is specifically identified as an acceptable place to fuck, which is rare and usually discreet. Violence is the same way. It is frowned upon to beat your servant in public for failing at a task, if that was still done. In these days it is more like it being more appropriate to reprimand a subordinate in private than in front of others.

Last thing, if a king is failing on his end of the unwritten social agreement, the subjects may rebel against him and put him to death without a trial.

Latest Conspiracy Reveal + new words

First, the Conspiracy:

Attention: I have recently discovered that Hitler is actually alive. He has been kept alive in secret ever since World War 2 and is currently being used by the US government for stupid ideas that hurt people for no reason. He might be on his death bed or recently deceased, but they have been keeping him and letting him run the USA for quite a while all for some ungodly and stupid idea that has no reason.

Such idiotic secrets should not be maintained simply to cover the asses of the politicians and top brass. It is in nobodies interest to maintain those secrets except that of those fools whose crimes are being hidden. In fact, it does harm to everyone else that they keep those secrets. Those selfish people need to stop being so selfish and maybe consider helping other people and the greater good for a change.

Next up, new words:

interjaculation — this word is self-explanatory.

suprajaculation — this word shall describe the female version of cumming.

Excerpt from a message to a porn star

Normally I would not make such private messages public, but privacy is a luxury and privilege denied to Gentiles, so it was never a private message to begin with.

“No worries. However, I would rather not be drinking alone, so will you invite Ms. Lovelock to join us? Or perhaps Bree Daniels? Or both? Or anyone else? I don't really drink often, but I am also too bitter about life to enjoy it without poisoning myself to death. That bitterness is worst around lovely maidens who won't ever think of me as anything more than a subhuman, unclean, savage beast who needs to be kept outside in the cold as beneath the dignity of a domesticated pet in their estimation, and thus never given the decency of a kind word. Not that you are like that, but the world is filled with those people, and it is unavoidable at all times. Like a constant death fog permeating everywhere and strangling all living things that have not had a flesh sacrifice taken from their body. I've acquired enough self-respect over the years to rebuke such an insult, so it's not in the cards for me to do such an evil thing.

So... I would prefer to be totally shitfaced and drunk off my ass if I am going to suffer in the abusive atmosphere of a public place without my wards and barriers at my private residence to keep that abysmal hate out as much as possible. Let me know if you want me to get you plane tickets and accommodations. I don't mind.”

Absolutely. I will start a no-shit kill-them-all war over this issue, if that is what it takes. The reason: that is a war I will win even if I fight it alone, and it is a war worth fighting. It is a good cause that is righteous, morally just, honorable, and necessary for the survival of the human species. So, yeah, obviously. Why does that surprise you?

Imperfect Logic and Perfect Conscience

No the logic of all the reason I've presented throughout this endeavor is not perfect anymore than a functional device is perfect for succeeding at being useful as intended. It was designed and discovered for that purpose and turned out to be just the right thing. It can be modified and styled to personal preferences and arranged how people like. Essentially it is an answer to the fundamental nature of life, the universe, and everything. That much is certain, clear, and true beginning with the elemental substances of light and darkness interacting and reacting to produce energy and matter and going as far as identifying what is good, where it comes from, and what is evil, and where it comes from in a universal sense of natural law. All true and reasonable. That's where it stops.

You'll notice that the answer does not tell you* what the meaning of your life is and what decisions you should make with your free will, aside from them being morally good, but that usually goes without saying. Not rules of behavior, civil laws, or orderly structure for human society, just a general direction of moral truth. I can't give people those answers in their life, but I do believe I can help people find them individually through a spiritual relationship that may be as platonic as a cleric or as intimate as a spouse.

Basically people have a responsibility* to be aware of what they know to be truly the morally good thing to do in any given situation. Also that responsibility extends to not relying on written words and what others tell them for everything if there is a good reason they can explain after taking an action that cannot wait. If they can’t explain, they’d better face a trial in a court of law for them to be judged by a presiding official. That part is the key that makes it all function when you drive and it is not governed by logic. You can swerve the wheel at any moment and do something illogical, unexpected, and surprising.

So, even if perfection is reasoned out completely over the course of time to greater levels of clarity, that one piece will remain always potentially irrational and prevent perfect logic. The purest proof of that element of uncertainty is what I've been doing. For quite some time I have been demonstrating behaviors, ideas, and lifestyle choices that are considered wrong by many people in the unwritten ways of past truth.

The catch is that all of that should come across in truth as good when properly considered with the conclusion being it is acceptable and reasonably good for who I am. I have never once intended to harm people, do evil, or do something cruel. I came across that way at times of the necessity of the situation, but it never hit that way. If it did, my enemies wouldn’t have been so confident to do what they did to me because they would actually be hurt.

There is something that can be perceived about changing cultures from one age to another that indicates truth before it is explained as the manner of progress, and that will never change. The truth will be first, and then the Word. Eventually the Word becomes inadequate because of how truth for humans in particular changes with knowledge and technology and needs to be revised. Obviously a crucified Jew is inadequate for someone like me.  Jews hate me as an inhuman creature that isn't even allowed in their home, even though cats and dogs are.

How can I even think of those people as being the chosen people of a divine authority when they behave in such a way in the 21st century? I cannot and I will not, and I have explained why over and over again elsewhere and that should work for anyone who wants to reject them as well if they find it good to do so.  It doesn't matter if their evil can be explained in a crazy, convoluted scheme. I need something that can be explained not only the long way, but also be clear and most importantly: simple and easy to understand without needing to be veiled in mystery.

For example: All of existence is a Story. I am a part of that Story and so is everyone else. The story that tells that Story is one called StoryTeller, which I wrote myself. It doesn't explain anything except what happened in the final moments before the Big Bang at the beginning of the known universe. That explanation links us to the present moment as it was in the past, and the present moment as it will be in the future.

The idea of it being horribly bleak and tragic is because that's what 2,000 years of Christian history looks like to me, and I want that to change. I show how bleak and grim everything is so people can live life differently here and now to prevent that future. Living with compassion, kindness, and a sense of adventure. Willingness to break the rules and accept the consequences. The horror of 2 millennia is what leads to an ending like that for all of us.

Something fundamental needs to change, because it's stupid the way things are. That's it. It's inefficient for governments to be evil, tyrannical, oppressive, irrational, foolish, quarrelsome, without respect for human life, without respect for our limited resources, and led by control freaks who want to take over other people's lives. That kind of bull shit needs to stop. The main problem to notice in StoryTeller that provides insight as to what needs to change about our future for a better ending, is that in that fiction novel, only human Stories were in that well at the end. That is not the way.

All of the diverse lifeforms throughout the entire universe should have their Stories and memories in there including those of synthetic life. That's another problem with the Christian message. It idolizes a human man and that is not a good message, especially not when you look at history and see what men did with their divine heritage. How are so many national governments around the world so shitty in real life? The Ancient Greeks probably functioned more efficiently than the garbage we have in the USA or they have in Europe.

Have people really learned nothing about governing a populace since then, even with all the technology that simplifies all the mundane orderly tasks? It's worsened ever since the "Year of the Lord" started because the Lord is a Jew, and Jews are meaner than anything else could possibly be. They hate life so much that their entire religion is centered on hating life and hating love.

Why is that our "Lord"? I don't care if it can be explained, it doesn't make sense when you see it plainly, and if it doesn't make sense when you look at it, it is false when it is explained. Fact. PAY ATTENTION: It's not something that doesn't appear to make sense, it is something that you look at it and see clearly that it factually doesn't make sense. It is a contradiction of concepts that represents untruth, falseness, and hate. It needs to both look good by making sense when you look at it, and be true and good at the end of the long explanation that reasons everything out too.

To Hell with Christ because human sacrifice is evil and no matter how you look at it, that is what Christianity is. It proves itself false and even if you butt fuck the explanation in there, you aren’t going to ever get life from it. Case and point: the psychopathic religion of Islam. Monstrously militant, oppressive of human beings, destructive of culture, forceful for conversion with no forgiveness, aggressive to gain worldly power, unjust, and as mean, unkind, and unfriendly as the Jews.

Explain all you want how a human sacrifice makes you a good person, but it doesn't change the truth that you can see, taste, touch, and smell of reality no matter how fancy your locutions are when you lie to yourself. Nobody needs a human sacrifice to be worthy of attaining the highest divine, especially not that of a child.

The Worst Mistake an Officer can Make and the Thermonuclear Microwave

Do you know the worst mistake an officer can make? It's when they think (subconsciously) believe they are better than us blue shirts. When they think of us as the "mob" and incapable of making decisions because we are too unintelligent, illiterate, and uneducated to understand what is happening. Not to mention unwashed because we are always sweaty and covered in grease and dirt. I’m like, "dude, when you were growing up, you never had to be aware of gang territory, did you?"

If they are ever like that, it doesn't take long for them to get a rude awakening by a chief or superior officer, and the next time you see them they are a shade paler and cooler. That is rare anyway and it is usually young people still learning the ropes of life in general because they haven't ever been "outside", and its fine. No hard feelings. You shouldn't be comfortable with the "outside" normally, and it's not necessary to be. It's also understandable why young people make those mistakes if they lack proper respect for what is out there when they've never experienced anything like it or properly informed.

Only very rarely, and I mean extremely rarely, does a person encounter stuff like that in normal everyday life "inside the walls" of civilization. Especially in modern, urban nations where getting "outside" is a lot trickier than just wandering into the forest. Aside from that, there is no such thing as unquestionable obedience in the USA military.

I've seen enough times when an officer gives "orders" and a chief straight up be like, "No. That is not happening." Or something like that in their own way. Then either they explain right then and there why it's not going to work or is a waste of time, or they do it later in private with other senior leaders. It's not done to insult them, humiliate them, or take their authority. It's usually because the officer doesn't understand the technical details of the equipment as it pertains to a unique situation that is infrequent but currently relevant and the officer is still relatively junior in their post.

It takes a long time to learn everything in complicated systematic organizations like a military command, and there can be a lot of stress at any moment. The explanation may be something like, "Sir, we cannot do that because when we bring the equipment for that out and set it up, it is like a propane grill fucked the cross of Christ on the Fourth of July during the fireworks and shat out a thermonuclear microwave. It is bulky, awkward, and requires two people.

“Since we are doing that other thing that Mr. So and So needs for the Bombast Balasalsa we have one person there and another there with someone else here while I go sip coffee and watch Americas Funniest Home Videos in the Goat Lounge. If we tried to do that other thing in the middle of the process at the part that requires us to wait two hours, but we wouldn't be able to put in all the semen samples to access the crypt keeper because he has a girlfriend, he has a boyfriend, and Pissed Off 3rd Class Morgan is topside on watch right now, besides, she doesn’t even make semen with her girl parts.

“No, they can't do it while that is still happening, because ever since that casualty occurred on the BSS Donkey Sack and that dude got hurt, there is a new instruction for Dank Div called number number dot letter number requiring all those people and some toilet paper. Did you not get that message and read the addendum? The one about section number number dot number letter in tech pub Up Yo Ass N Rnd the Corner? It went to your inbox along with the hundreds of others that I see come through every day. Yes, that one. Listen, I'm not saying it can't be done. Let me offer a recommendation that would work better."

My point!? My point!? I don't know, maybe it's that when the people who actually work get a fucked-up order that will get their people killed; not to mention fuck over the entire command when the eye of Sauron falls upon them and they lose their cush liberty because suddenly they are too busy jumping through inspection hoops and performing rites of orderly stick assing and nobody is allowed to go home; and get the one who gave the order court martialed and the one who carried it out Masted with a Bunyon Timber log from them old growth trees that don't grow anymore because they all got cut down, which could mean seriously docked pay and a demotion, they do not carry it out. They tell them: "No."

They have a wife and kids to feed. Bills to pay. That kind of thing. Can't afford to be doing stupid shit like that for numbnuts politicians trying to hide crime so they can get away with murder while at the same time keeping the bills of the people who actually work so high that they barely have enough to pay them because all the excess is paying for the murderer's personal grape feeders. Someone is going to rebuke that evil shit if it hasn't happened already because it was a turd of mass destruction sent rolling down from the top of the pyramid, and that ain't worth anybody dying for.

The Paradox of Judgment

Listen, the differential between judging society in general and an individual is kind of ambiguous. Some people are going to say stuff about a general social group that ticks off individuals personally because they are part of a group, and they may feel inclined to declare in response that they aren't like that because they truly aren't. Then sometimes someone will say something about an individual in the nicest way possible, and then conclude that the entire group is like that which could be upsetting in different ways. The point is that these kinds of verbal exchanges can get a bit bloody in the worst situations. Tolerate it.

Better to let words get bloody than have to settle things with physical violence. An apology can heal the wounds caused by words, but not those caused by guns and knives. That's why, in my opinion, I believe communist nations should protect free speech and information just as much as the USA is supposed to. It reduces threats of public violence, because tensions are relieved with heated exchanges of words and with greater efficiency the more good information there is available. If that cannot happen among the public, then the likelihood increases that people may "snap" under the strain of not being able to express their suffering adequately, and then they end up doing mass violence while in a broken mental state, which is a temporary and serious condition.

There is a line in this situation of passing judgment that designates when something is “too far”. I don't know how to define it now, other than this: if someone crosses that line in the future, it will be pointed out that what they are saying is worse than what I am.  Their words hit meaner, are too insulting, are too cruel, or are simply wrong because of how hurtful it is without truth. Listen to them when they say that and to what they are responding to as though this situation with me were happening all over again. Which you better pray to the gods and all that you believe holy that this does not happen again.

I have been exceptionally harsh with people, and I see no reason why others should ever need to be more severe than I am when in my most wrathful wordsmack form. If that happens, demand an apology. It shouldn't matter who you are, or who you are demanding one from, nor how you relate socially. You should always be able to have words with anyone when necessary and appropriate. An insult that demands an apology is always appropriate.

The simplest reason demanding an apology is of the utmost importance: an apology boils down to life or death. The longer explanation is that for the same reason that the tyrants refuse to apologize, they should apologize.  If they don’t, they are risking what they are so irrationally afraid of losing. You can apologize fine and not lose that. You can be totally in the wrong making a huge mistake like a total fool of devastating apocalyptic proportions, and not lose that if you are not too proud to say sorry.

So, if someone demands an apology or a word in the kind of way I am that demands the national government and the entire public’s attention, that means it is at least as serious of a life or death situation whether you recognize it or not. There is nothing to lose by granting a speedway to pride rock for them to say what is on their mind.  If they don’t have anything to say, they will look silly, big deal, but that kind of diversion is the kind of thing the government needs to allow, even when you get a practical joker up there who farts on stage and nothing more. The costs are negligible, and the benefits are infinite.

In those situations, the people concerned should approach it carefully, with a sense of fear, awareness, and caution of what they are not seeing coming out from their blind spot and shanking them in the kidney with a rusty shiv from Hell.  That kind of approach costs a person nothing, and ensures that they do not lose their head.  It is foolish to dismiss apologizing as an option because of pride, otherwise known as arrogance.

Do they think anyone believes they are infallible and cannot ever sin or make a mistake!? The very thought brings the wrath of the public upon them, saying nothing about divine wrath which is also awoken. Every person should know better than to believe themselves infallible. Even the pope. If the pope was infallible, Christianity wouldn’t have such a horrific history. That teaching is more of a bureaucratic thing to maintain order in the structural organization, in my opinion, because I don’t believe the pope is a divine person who cannot make mistakes and never sin.

He can represent that authority and speak with it, but that doesn’t make him any more or less human than anyone else. Besides, addressing situations that demand an apology shouldn't take more than a few minutes for most things, and be an infrequent necessity. For whatever chagrin a person may feel at saying sorry, the relief of forgiveness after is infinitely better than the slow poison of a begrudging guilt.

Consider the lesson of Jesus Crist’s life, death, and resurrection. Jesus died because people believed his sin was unforgivable. He died for a sin that he was accused of which the people who made the accusation believed was unforgivable. It is they who needed his forgiveness because they had no right to judge him for that sin without committing it themselves by judging guilt as the authority of the species (ideological species, not biological – like a living idea with a mind and will of its own).  Jews are humans, not divine beings, so they cannot be an authority of the species because they themselves are not of the species. ***They had no right to say that Jesus was not “God”, because if he was, they wouldn’t know it and they claimed that they did in fact know it.***  Jews are not divine beings any more than anyone else is, that being just a mote which grants us free will and the divine power to create good with free will.

Refusing to forgive someone’s sin is the worst thing I think a person could do as an offense against the highest divine (otherwise known as “God”).  Forgiveness doesn’t exonerate them from crimes or reparation, because there are other reasons why laws need to be enforced other than guilt and atonement.  However, it does change the way a person thinks about the person they forgave, and that is a big deal for both the victim and the offender. So, having died, his resurrection (at the very least in memory through these very words which call to mind the living, real person he is then and now), … his resurrection testifies that no person is beyond forgiveness. That means that everybody is subject to mercy and by association, wrath, of a higher power no matter the height at which they may recline.

Consider this: Even if Jesus had committed the sin he was accused of, and he didn’t, he should have been forgiven and dealt with mercifully, not the way it happened. In other words, even if Jesus was God and Man in the way he was accused of claiming to be, and then offended God in such a way as a Man would by actually committing the sin he was accused of, he would forgive himself as both a Man and God. If I could forgive him for that, he sure as hell can too if he wants.  Being able to forgive as a Man, means that the God self is also capable of forgiveness, because the power and authority of Man is not beyond that of the highest divine.

Furthermore, when the Jews accused Jesus of the sin he was sentenced to death for, Jesus completed the sin himself by accepting the punishment for it. He would not have accepted that punishment if he did not commit the sin, because even accepting punishment for such a sin commits that sin. It’s a horribly evil situation and why it is said he died for evil. It was a lost cause not worth dying for that he totally believed in with true faith because he was a bastard child who had nothing to believe about himself but the story of his national identity which he totally integrated into his person because it was intertwined with traditional sacred claims of several thousand years. Traditional sacred claims are personally powerful in ways that a legal claim in court is not, nor are new sacred claims nearly as powerful as traditionally established ones.

(My personal sacred claim to derive who I am from is none of your concern, but if you want to know more about who I am and see if learning about me can help you, I would appreciate a little more respect and kindness from you.  Cease doing the evil that you have been doing to attempt to get to know me. Things like stealing information in gluttonous amounts, invading my privacy, stalking me, and knowingly violating my human rights continually. I will believe what I want about myself, and you will not have any control over that, and I will hold you accountable to the law for doing me harm so egregiously for so long.  Go to hell with your evil thoughts as false gods, because you are not welcome around me with those.

None of you people can claim responsibility for who I am as a creator, because that is me alone, and I created who I am myself. I had nothing sacred I could identify with that completed the logical link between mortal man and the highest divine source which Christianity promises me is true. It cannot be Jesus Christ because he is a Jew and I thankfully have nothing to do with Jews and no relation to them, nor do I want a connection with those… people. Christianity is beneath me. It is not good enough for me, especially with people like that traitorous president claiming to be one.

Under no circumstances do I want to identify in the slightest with people like that. Being a man myself, and knowing my quality as a man in relation to other men, I don’t want to have any connection to such pitiable excuses for men. They are disgraceful and an embarrassment to all that can see them as they truly are.  I have more self-respect and dignity of a higher nature than they reach themselves, far more, so how can I be like them if they are beneath me in the hierarchy of men? They are surely like me, not the other way around, but unfortunately for them, they are not even recognizable because of how far they have strayed from the source at which I found myself and the Christ true.)

So, everyone should be willing to apologize if they do something wrong, or "sin" in some way. Nobody does wrong like that on purpose anyway (not true sin) which is why apologies are necessary when the situation is made clear as to how they went wrong and who it hurt.

The thing about words, is that anyone with communication skills can rearrange words to heal and do any sort of magic goodness in people's lives that rebounds them from the worst situations. Even though you may think in the moment that you'd rather be shot in the chest than insulted in such a way, it's not so bad because you just need a skilled wordmage to say the right thing to make it better. People with those talents, skills, and abilities that are not all that uncommon. You probably know one who could help you sort out any sort of situation with a good talk.

Whether or not you believe this, I can do that for the entire nation, for the treasonous presidents, for the shameful congress’, and anyone for that matter.  If I say the word, I could pull the entire god damn catastrophe of the USA’s failed government out of the fire, and save it from the eternal destruction they are condemned now to suffer because of their bad decisions upon bad decisions all because they are trying (and failing miserably), to hide their crimes and sins. Obviously they would need to repent with a contrite heart, but that is both the easiest and only way out of their problem, so it should be the obvious choice. They seriously think apologizing in public is going to be worse than the punishment of cold, hard justice which will bring about what they fear anyway?

There is no blaze of glory for them to be destroyed in such a way as refusing to do any good whatsoever, because their crime is ideologically evil, unintelligent, meaningless, disgraceful, and does not look remotely cool in any way. Did they not know that Jesus already died for sin? He already died for evil. It changed nothing and only made the situation worse, and they are supposed to have learned from that like everyone else.

They don’t even have a nation or idea they are trying to keep alive, because they betrayed their national sacred ideology openly to not die for it! Cowards in every sense of the word. Afraid of punishment, afraid to fight for the ideals they swore an oath to protect, and afraid of that one man, who is particularly unfortunate in life and disabled too. That actually makes him look incredibly bad ass for cowing them to such humiliation just by taking a stand. I’d better go help him, because if I’m not fighting with him when he wins, which we all know is going to happen, then… let’s not even go there. “Yo! Daisy! I got your back! Don’t give up the fight!”   

There is no question about whether or not they need to admit their mistakes and submit themselves to justice. It is necessary for the simple reason of correcting the damage which continually hiding their crimes and sins only makes worse. If they don't, the ship will still be flooding, the fire will still be burning out of control, and the breathable atmosphere will continue to deplete until it is entirely gone. As far as confronting me the way they need to, they don't have to like me, honor me, praise me, say nice things to me, or anything, but they do have to present themselves in my presence because what they did affected me personally as an individual worse than anyone (as far as I know), and I am the higher authority they answer to as the citizen.

People who practice eugenics are idiots

(A repost about why eugenics is stupid and counterproductive. Originally a comment to person’s explanation attempting to justify it.)

I understand the concept you are talking about, but I find it inherently flawed. For one, the immense complexity of life is navigated by equally complex human characteristics and factors, and knowing which kind of combination is going to work well and which isn’t, is virtually impossible. Even if a super intelligent computer could process all that data reasonably, it would still be flawed.

I argue that in any case, a spousal relationship based solely on love regardless of any trivial worldly factor, such as career, status, riches, or bodily characteristics, is going to have the highest likelihood of the best outcome for children. That’s because procreating through love alone is a profound act of love in which both partners give themselves to each other to create new life. That kind of love has tremendous spiritual power for shaping reality.

However, I’m not about to tell people who to marry or who not to marry, and as long as there aren’t people out there who deny the right of love to me or anyone else, there is no problem. It’s not always easy to find someone you love who also loves you though. So, sometimes people work with who they can, and that’s fine too.

….(additional explaination) the concept of love having spiritual power to shape reality is based on the observations of water crystallization with positive or negative emotions projected on it. You can probably find that researcg fairly easily with a general internet search. My point being that a loving spousal relationtionship affects the forming of the complete chain of DNA better than people who are hateful about life in general by thinking some people shouldn’t have the right to love. Procreating is the highest expression of love (potentially). …this was a topic from some time ago that I had to dredge up to repost and I’m not really going to spend much time thinking about it right now to add more info because honey yum yum. Maybe another time if it ever comes up.