Rain Down Theory of Economics

The problem with the current economy is simple. The people with the most money continue to accrue more money and waste the value of the dollar. This is especially problematic now because the previous president encouraged rich people to become more rich, and was encouraged to do so by rich people wanting to become more rich.

Allow me to explain why such a thing is counterproductive: As the people with the most income gain more money and further distance themselves from the income level of the majority, the value of the dollar weakens. Less people have power to use the dollar and so there is less power in the dollar altogether. They commit all kinds of greedy, shady maneuvers to become more rich but effectively only make themselves poorer.

The healthiest economy, and one where the individuals with the highest income have the most power with money, is one where the most people have power with money. The best way to establish this is to ensure that every person has easily available access to enough money to provide for all of their basic needs and then some. One doesn't have to be rich for that. To increase the value of the dollar, the poor should be given more money, and the cost of living balanced so it is useful. By increasing the value of the dollar, the rich people will increase the value of their money without needing to pile more of it.

One of the problems with hoards of money is that vast amounts of currency are idle and unproductive for the economy. Investing in the stock market is not a productive use of currency. There is no real value in the stock market. Real value is found in things like structures, equipment, products, labor, etc. The stock market indirectly may provide that, but only after profiteering individuals take a portion of the value for themselves. It may be useful for some business situations, but it shouldn't be considered a productive use of money to have it piled in banks and not being put to work for other people rather than just for the investor.

People who have exorbitant amounts of money have a responsibility to find productive ways to put their money to use. I call this "the burden of the rich". It is not something they should receive sympathy for unless in some unlikely situation they are being abused by a malignant and malicious government.

This is called "Rain Down Economics". Find ways to give more money to more people to use in the economy. In return the value of the dollar will increase and value of the money all people have will increase. The basic methodology is applied by sound business ethics. Businesses should not try to cheat people or extract maximum profit for basic needs, such as shelter. It is good to make a profit, but not good to make as much profit as possible for such things.

I hope this helps.

A child born of a Gentile and Jew wonders if he is a Jew (not a joke)

You are what you choose to be. Judaism is a religious ideology that is more secular than faith-based because of its morally evil theology. That is a factually true statement. Religion is generally about being a good person, but Judaism is generally about being an evil person, which is why I don’t respect them at all, and never will.

The Abrahamic Covenant from which all Jews identify with as their origin apart from everyone else, is undeniably evil and provably so. Therefore, you can choose to deny it, which is right, just, and true, and Judaism has no meaning other than a delusion people insist on by force of violence. So, it all depends on whether or not you believe what the Jews do about the Abrahamic Covenant. Jews will try to tell you that it’s not a choice, as an ethnicity, but it definitely is and that idea is a common deception they use to try and take advantage of other people.

Judaism is entirely based on an idea which is morally fraudulent and wrong and has nothing to do with physiology, genetics, race, ethnicity, or national identity unless you accept the false claim that they insist is true. That claim is not possible because it defies the goodness of the highest divine by being an evil act of worship in exchange for worldly power. That exchange is by all accounts not in accordance with the divine laws of truth and goodness which they are trying to manipulate to their evil advantage by faithlessly abusing the spiritual nature of humanity. They particularly take advantage of people like you who ask questions like this because you are seeking guidance or of people who are vulnerable and weak in general, such as newborn infants.

For example, the common use of the word “God” has two implications. One, it is a word used to identify when one is referring to the highest divine which is a concept that cannot be adequately expressed in human language. Two, it refers specifically to the Jewish deity of worship. Therefore, “God” is a superstition and there is no such thing. You need not fear anything like that because it is an evil, Jewish idea with no meaning other than causing their own torment.

The true concept which that confused word refers to has no need for a a written or spoken form and is self-evident without need of any expression. Not spoken, not written, not ritualized. Nothing. It takes no offense when someone denies what it isn’t, the word “God” or “YHWH” being prime examples of what the divine is not. It exists as it is and that is all there is to it. Nothing humans can do or say about it changes what it is and how it relates to all existence. No ritual, no sacrifice, nothing. Least of all a murderous and evil human sacrifice such as in the Abrahamic covenant or with Jesus.

Back in the day, a Christian or Jew would kill someone like me for saying this, but they can’t get away with that kind of lawlessness anymore. That is the only reason why it is still around in human consciousness. They murderously and violently forced everyone to pretend that it is to be taken seriously. They have no power to do that anymore and they are dwindling away to non-existence. The only thing that will remain, is the faint memory of obscure human history forgotten in obsolete archives and the lingering use of the word “Christ” or “Jesus Christ” as a form of profanity, insult, blasphemy, and a common expression of cursing.

Someday people may trace back the origins of why that word has any relevance as a hateful curse when there is no longer any memory of Judaism. They will delve into that obscure history to be horrified of the immense evil that darkened humanity as a result of the abomination and unlawful, evil, and failed experiment of Judaism.

Some people will probably doubt that it’s not so bad, because rumors will go around about a religion, and experts will be like, “oh no, it is. Look it up for yourself if you really think it might have any value,” and then help them find all information they may want. The conclusion being, “damn… Jews really are evil. Jesus Christ what the fuck!? How could human beings be so evil on a massive scale of public delusion? Holy shit… that’s why the government takes the law so seriously and why honor and integrity are important even though they seem like dorks sometimes and can be sticklers over the smallest matters that seem to make no difference. It all makes sense now.”

Is circumcision a “small matter”? What is the going value of human flesh?

You know how a lot of popular media portrays the future as a dystopian, grungy place that is dark, unpleasant, and generally fucked up with a tyrannical and evil government authority? That’s not how it’s going to be. That is what Judaism, Islam, and Christianity lead to, and we are putting a stop to it so it doesn’t happen. The future is going to be good, as it should be.

It’s fun to pretend you are a hero in an evil world like that and save everyone while gathering a harem of lovely maidens and always will be, but reality is going to actually be a good world. Really good. The evil problems of the world today are going to be unthinkable in the future and people will sometimes get reckless and rebellious and out of line which is normal and fine, but it will be mostly harmless. The difference is that light years before they even come close to the terror, evil, and malevolence of the world today, they will see or be shown their mistake, and either correct it or have it corrected if they won’t.

The days of evil humans acting like wild beasts that can bludgeon each other around with human inventions is coming to an end, and people like me are going to ensure that it never gets a chance to come back.

Additionally, it is not fun to actually live in an evil world and have to fight it. That is not a good feeling. It is a nightmare. It is only fun when playing make believe and pretending, and that’s the only place where evil can exist. If you ever notice evil in real life, it needs to be seen as the most severe threat and if you can’t put a stop to it on your own, find someone who can.

So, if you are in the distant future and looking back on history where evil happened, don’t pin the evil on the humans. Humans only do evil because they are confused. They never do evil on purpose. If they think they are doing it on purpose, they have no idea what they are doing and are stupid. They need to be put to justice, but they are still humans and humans aren’t evil. None of creation is evil. For further information on evil, feel free to look up my other discourses on the subject where I explain in full detail what it is, why it exists, and what to do about it.

How can autism be cured and what is its cause?

Round up all the cute maidens of marriageable quality from all the realms and deliver them before Nicholas Bylotas, official representative and ambassador of Autism Intergalactic. They will then enter into a loving and awesome harem with me. I will, after we say our honest, loving, and consensual vows, administer the cure by a secret method that I will never reveal or explain.

The cause? Honestly, the problem is mass ignorance from people who ignore certain vital matters of social and cultural importance. Autistic people often find these things impossible to ignore because we can sense how interconnected they are with everything else. Additionally, sensations can be rather intense for autistic people so that’s another reason why they can’t be ignored, because they are so problematic that something needs to be done about it because of how intensely we experience the problem. This is speaking in general, because autism is very diverse and can’t really be pinned down into specific definitions and categories, which is why it is recognized as a spectrum of endless possibilities.

If nobody saw that kind of thing as abnormal, and just listened to people who think differently with an open mind and didn’t often judge people negatively, then autism wouldn’t be considered a problem. Instead, people often shun others who think differently or don’t fit in with the normal social behaviors and thinking, which is why it becomes a disability. We may find it difficult to participate in society because people won’t allow us to and often perceive us with hostility because we are different, or because our ideas may indicate that society in general or specific systems need to change in fundamental ways.

I think the reason for that is that most people are faithless in general (without hope or belief in goodness beyond what they presently perceive as possible) and lazy. They think that fundamental changes are impossible because they don’t want to do any work, nor do they want to believe that there is something wrong with what they are doing and the way things are. That’s ridiculous behavior and thinking because society, a system, a government, or a religion, isn’t something people should take personally as if changing it is going to change them.

The reality is that change comes from what flows into those systems (what I think is aptly referred to as a spiritual substance of human nature) and is going to happen whether they like it or not. If they don’t anticipate it and adapt before it arrives, it’s going to be more difficult. A person attempting to initiate such change may seem angry, but that shouldn’t be seen as a sign of antagonism if you think about what they are saying and why.

Anger is a normal human emotion and shouldn’t be seen as hostility as much as it should be a sign of a person who requires aid of some sort. Seeing anger as threatening is very primitive because human beings should be aware of each other as similar to themselves. We all get angry from time to time, some more than others, but it doesn’t mean we want to kill everything even if in the most extreme cases we may feel like that momentarily. Like, “whoa, what has you so angry? is there something I can do to make it better? It was something I said? What part? Oh, sure, I will apologize. Can you acknowledge where I am coming from too? I was angry when I said that and it’s not really your fault, but I’m hurting because of it and I just need someone to care in the smallest way possible.” or “I see that you are angry about something I am unwilling to compromise on. Surely we can figure something out like reasonable human beings and set our personal feelings aside to do what is right, just, and good. Let’s talk about it and do something to make it better. I have some ideas on hand that may help.”

People who are megalomaniacs, commonly referred to as control freaks, have a big problem with people proposing ideas that don’t fit neatly into their scheme and destabilize all of their contrived machinations. That’s why people like Jesus get executed without a good reason, or otherwise have their lives oppressed to this day. Society in the USA is actually rather barbaric, uncivilized, and savage for that reason. They often act like chimpanzees who see an unfamiliar chimpanzee and try to kill it because they have an irrational, primal fear that anything unfamiliar but looks like them is a threat as an imposter.

So… I guess if there is an actual cure to autism, it is proper education. Autism won’t go away, but neurotypical people who have a problem with it won’t be troubled anymore. They are the ones that need to be cured, not the autistic people. We just need to live with it, and possibly require some accommodations, because it is part of who we are on a fundamental level that is related to our physiology with genetics and neurocognitive structure. I actually don’t want to be cured of it, because if it means I’m going to be normal like most people, I don’t want to be that way. I see what is normal to be a disgrace to humanity and a grave offense against moral dignity and good judgment, and after years of trying to understand, I have only been given more justification to see that as in fact what they are.

Why do circumcised people claim to be grateful they were circumcised?

That’s because you don’t know what you are missing and are lying to yourself. However, I bear you no ill will because you didn’t perpetuate that harm and malevolent deceit onto others. Your daughter is a problem though because you probably poisoned her soul to be a dick sucking whore that swallows the circumcised smegma as the evil duty of a typical female Jew slave who has no dignity. It’s much easier to cure your daughter than it would be to cure a circumcised son.

Basically she could just spend a nice weekend with me or any other decent Gentile and enjoy herself. Then she will forsake circumcision by realizing how burdensome, useless, and unpleasant it is to carry around, especially since she has her own burden to carry as a female. I can’t possibly love a circumcised male, so they don’t get to enjoy anything like that, unfortunately for them, but I can reason with them if they are capable of thought.

Back when women were material property the way children are now, they had no responsibility for the circumcision of males, but that is no longer the case these days. Now the burden of circumcision is doubled because two people commit that inestimably evil and pointless sin and have to carry it around along with everything else, making their lives far more miserable for no benefit. Their delusions of sexual preference actually make them more miserable because of how dehumanizing that form of sex is.

Sometime people are like, “you don’t know what you are missing by not being circumcised.” I’m like, I don’t even care! I don’t feel like I’m missing anything, unlike circumcised people who are reminded of it every time the see their own genitals. As the common saying goes “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” That saying, for those who don’t know, means that when you try to “fix” something that is working fine, you end up breaking it so it doesn’t work at all and make a problem when there wasn’t one.

The concept of improvement and advancement is different, because that’s not “fixing” something they way circumcision is often believed to do. I have no problem with being uncircumcised no matter what circumcised people accuse me of. They say all sorts of things they think and believe because of prejudice and bigotry, and I’m like, “whatever bro, sure.” I don’t have a single moment of stress or shame about it and don’t feel like I have to prove anything at all, because I don’t. I can, but I definitely don’t have to.

Myself, I drink the honey yum yum from the sacred valley of maidenly loveliness, if I ever have the opportunity, because it feels good and I like the taste. I stay far away from the putrid valleys of maidenly rottenness which are all over the place these days as a result of women dutifully swallowing circumcised smegma which corrupts their sanctity and befouls them.

A word of advice, many women are Jew slaves and take advantage men who cultivate honey yum yum with no respect for what we do in order to cultivate it. They then take their share of the goodness and give it to the circumcised male whose smegma they are swallowing. That male doesn’t enjoy it for its goodness, and instead defiles it into a means of doing harm, which further violates the sacred and is an offense to all that is decent.

As Jew slaves women don’t enjoy any of the benefits of life and simply must work without any dignity for circumcised men, which is why they do that. So, don’t just go around cultivating honey yum yum without thought, because Jews take advantage of that kindness to do meaningless harm to people in order destroy life and be hateful toward love in an attempt to ruin all honey yum yum everywhere. There is no reason anyone should want to do that, which is why all forms of blind obedience should be rejected, and why honey yum is extremely scarce in the USA.

(This was a response to an individual situation which is why the pronoun “you” is used and there is mention of a daughter.)

Does Hitler have a redeeming quality? The moral of the Bible.

He took a stand against Jews. He was misguided and confused about what good was and definitely didn’t know how to plan effectively or lead people, resulting in catastrophic crimes against humanity, but he did recognize Jews as evil and a threat to society, civilization, and life in general, which is more than you can say about a lot of people in the world these days. Most ignorant fools are actually helping Jews without knowing why and just do it because they are compelled to as slaves to evil.

Jews will be more than happy to have you help them, and will encourage it telling you anything you want hear and promising you riches and power beyond your wildest dreams. Then when you are no longer useful to them, they will happily stab you in the back to rifle whatever savings you were hiding from them and kidnap your women to keep as sex slaves for the most depraved, vile, and evil acts of perversity that satisfy malevolent sadism.

Jewish women, fearing the violence and cruelty of the men, will be even more harmful to them than the male Jews. That’s because they will betray feminine sanctity to give the male Jews insidious new ideas of how to torture women.

Eventually their hate will cause their society to fail because no one will be doing useful work and everyone doing evil useless work that only does harm, such as stock brokers. Crops will fail, resources will run out, and they’ll literally start cannabalizing each other. It’s around that time they will be so scared of their own death that they will turn to religion and try and remember how to be good. That well will have run dry as it was written, “and when that happens, your king will cry out for me, and I won’t answer,” and then Jews will be no more.

If there is a moral to the Bible, it’s that ignorance and apathy is the road to destruction. You should never just obey without question, prevent your own understanding of the truth, and do evil like Abraham did. Abraham’s malignant and malevolent idiocy has brought about nothing but useless strife, perdition, and suffering for all people who accept it. They follow like obedient minions because it’s what they are told to do and they don’t question why or follow their conscience, and in fact reject their conscience to obey, which any living being knows better than to do. Jews are basically the icon of sin, and a living example of failure, destruction, evil, and all that is morally repugnant that should be avoided at all costs.

Commentary on Maggot Eyes saying something about a Black man named Charlemagne

I posted this as a comment somewhere, but I’m just going to answer the question. I still don’t know who the fuck that guy is, but this is what I can surmise about him just from the context of the question:

Some asshole Black guy really has the name Charlemagne? I read this question and was like, who the fuck is that? In any case, don’t trust that guy, he’s not worthy.

Not because he’s Black, but because Charlemagne was a great person, and the loser in the question is not. That person, whoever the fuck they are, can be identified as a sycophant, a political slave with no will of their own, evil, and a disgrace to humanity because they are perpetuating an evil regime. They are also probably Protestant, which is also another basket of evil, infested dicks that should not be allowed anywhere near a human being. There is nothing great about that person.

Additionally, Charlemagne (the real one), was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by the Roman Catholic Pope. Aside from anyone trying to be an emperor of Christianity today being abominably evil, arrogant, and repugnant, I have to wonder why a parent would curse their child with a name like that. Probably wanted him to be a Protestant emperor, which is absurdly ignorant and morally wrong. Protestants are so fucking dumb it’s pathetic and offensive. They have no idea what Christianity is and are worse than Mormons with the way they twist it for their own private interests.

Protestants actually believe they don’t have to do any work. They teach a doctrine of apathy and laziness when their very faith as a religious doctrine is offensive and a blight on humanity. So, they make no efforts to be useful or good, while at the same time their presence offends, pollutes, violates love, and poisons life with evil in the form of human sacrifice and blood ritual.

They are like a parasite that has no symbiotic worth at all. They are purely malignant, like the alien face fucker that bursts out of a person’s chest after busting its load down their throat, murdering them and everyone else around them. In doing so, it also puts all of human life in danger by being a vicious creature that is extremely dangerous, has no sentience, which requires benevolence, compassion, and conscience, and it cannot be reasoned with. No. If someone is still claiming to be Christian today, they are identifying as ignorant, and if they are Protestant, they are identifying as malignantly ignorant.

Catholics have their problems, and I don’t mean to make them look good, but they at least maintain what it’s all about at their center, which is the Pope, even if they are struggling to remind everyone world-wide what that is. It’s hard to blame them after things got so out of hand with centuries of secular corruption in the form of unworthy kings, queens, emperors, and popes using the cross as a crude bludgeon to get their way. Christianity has very little credit these days, whereas in the beginning, it actually meant something to say you were Christian.

It means a hell of a lot more to a person’s good credit if they identify as a Satanist today, than it does to identify as a Christian. I mentioned this years ago in a letter I wrote to Barrack Obama, but basically, if Christians want to safely and reasonably extricate themselves from the Christian Story they put their honest faith in, Satanism is an acceptable avenue.

Guess what’s waiting for you at the end of the Christian avenue: a Jew with a knife who wants you as a slave working his fields so he can gloat over your humility and send you to die so he can take your wife. When you get there, if you turn your back because nobody wants that, there will be no hesitation when they plunge the knife into you, even if they claim to be your own father. Trust me. I know from experience, and it is not a good feeling. I’m also somewhat of an expert on the subject as a scholar of Christianity.

I would have credentials on my profile, but Quora won’t allow it. Their moderators have removed every credential, amounting to around ten, except one which is only valid when paired in relation to another, which they removed, to indicate a range of expertise. Those credentials which they won’t allow include the business I own and operate and have for over ten years and been tax accountable for, as well as my religion and hobbies.

Is V the villain in V for Vendetta?

He’s not. The villain is the evil government which abuses its power in an attempt to control the citizens like material objects they possess and no regard for individual freedom, identity, or humanity. It’s not like an individual bad guy like the Green Goblin, but more like a state of corrupt bureaucracy that spawned from public apathy which made no attempt to prevent it from seizing control of them.

Why they are so apathetic is likely to do with circumcision because by tolerating that, people have become apathetic to just about every other form of evil that goes on around them and make no efforts to be good. So, circumcision is another villain in the comic, but less directly involved through inference, whereas the result of circumcision on society is the obvious villain.

V is the hero and protagonist who stands against it and fights them. He inspires people to shake off their apathy and take a stand against the government. A government has as much power as people believe it has, so when people start losing faith in their government, the government starts to fail and loses its power. That’s why V’s strategy is effective. He educated himself and learned the nature of power which the government foolishly thinks is in the barrel of a gun or the edge of sword. Therefore, in order to defeat such a monstrously violent villain, V needs not a gun, nor a sword, but simply a person willing to learn and some honest education.

Have you ever heard that theory about the 100th monkey? Ideas are like that. As soon as they start catching on in numbers, they start spontaneously popping up all over the place and across vast distances.

The USA government is suffering their collapse at this moment. People are losing faith in them at a rapidly increasing rate and their center of power is shrinking. Eventually they will have nothing left but the handful of human wills operating the government for their personal, selfish, and perverse interests. They won’t be able to tell their minions to kill for them, because people won’t accept their authority anymore having shaken off their apathy.

They will then realize that those villainous individuals are actually unlawful according to what is written and respected and will throw them in prison with their own method of abusing people, only that it will be used righteously as intended, and not evilly. Then the procedural restructuring of government can commence and prevent it from ever getting out of control again by installing additional safeguards.

At that point, government itself is nothing and has no mind of its own. It’s basically just a pile of papers. The technique of applying one’s justification in a nonbodily entity as their source of authority for committing any crime they please, is the basic technique of the Jews using monotheism. It’s totally inappropriate to do with a government because a government has no sacred claim at all. That’s how that non-bodily entity seems to take on a life of its own, which it doesn’t have. It’s just a gang of hooligans shoving each other around with peer pressure and blaming it on the non-bodily entity they are controlling.

My response to a Black racist

I believe you are a racist. You seem to have such a small mind that you can’t grasp the bigger picture of how the world works, and how long it has been that way. I suggest you pick up a book and try to educate yourself.

What do you think the people who established the USA have been fighting for? Do you think that was their first step? Or do you think maybe that was progress of a movement that has been going on under extreme oppression since Christ was murdered by racists who wouldn’t accept an idea of equality even from their own race, just to oppress the idea. The fact is, it has nothing to do with race, mostly to do with circumcision, and partly to do with human foolishness that prioritizes status and riches over anything of real value.

If you equate monetary riches with human value, such as in your example, you are so pathetically ignorant and morally deficient that you do not understand the first thing about what a human being is. I suggest you stop even talking about human rights because of how confused you are. Just get with the herd that goes to green pastures where money, status, and bull shit are unnecessary. That’s where we are going.

If you had any sense, you would see that those “wealthy” people, who are not actually wealthy because they are unhappy by constantly demanding more with unjust and evil means which never bring happiness, are actually unworthy of humanity. Instead, you seem to have accepted your own inferiority because of what you possess in relation to others, which means your entire movement has already been defeated. You measure your value with things, and are thus no better than a beast.

Seriously, dude. Think about what your answer says. Basically you are arguing that you are in fact inferior and you want me to acknowledge that. Enough with the self-pity please, because I have no respect for people like you who play the victim to try and get other people to fight for you instead of fighting for yourself. You are so uninspiring and a disappointment to humanity that I would never join your team. I would rather keep fighting solo against impossible odds, than side with someone as weak willed as you.

Either you won’t be able to guard my back because of your inability, or you will purposely betray me for a chicken wing on a string if I show you my back. In either case, your team is scheduled for destruction and I’m not going to be with you when it happens.

I would much rather be slain gloriously in battle than accept unjust and untruthful inferiority like you do in an attempt to get your own hoard of bananas. I prefer to eat the flesh of beasts anyway and will hunt to the ends of the earth and further to get my daily bread if that’s what it takes.

In real life, your skin color, your religion, whether or not you are circumcised, female, gay, whatever, doesn’t mean a god damn thing, because real life is immaterial and transcends the body. It’s what happens when you grow up as a person and why children are excused as children. A person doesn’t understand the nature of real life until they actually get there. In real life, what you do and what you say are more important than what you look like.

Furthermore, sex is generally* off limits in real life because it’s rude and there are often children present who are completely oblivious to what is happening and a person shouldn’t abuse that ignorance. That is why circumcision should have no importance anymore, especially if Christianity was anything like its purpose. Nobody gives a fuck about bodily things on that level because there are more important things to deal with that actually require thought, and the body is of little consequence. It’s not about eating food, it’s about sustaining agriculture, and truly delicious culinary creations.

It’s not about piling money, it’s about doing business in a prosperous and productive way that gives back more than it profits. Business should be motivated by profit, but if any of those idiots had any sense they wouldn’t be trying to drain as much profit as they can and would be trying to keep that at a minimum to meet their needs and reasonable desires appropriate to the scale of their business. Most of those people you were likely referring to as “wealthy” don’t know what real life is, even though they are rich because they are incapable of ascending above their creaturely body where real life occurs. If they did know, there is no way there would be as much evil in and corruption in the USA as there is because they wouldn’t tolerate it in their presence.

That is why making a big stink about white privilege and pointing blame at people over the color of their skin doesn’t accomplish anything. It’s just the clashing gongs of howling beasts in a dirty alleyway.

The best scene in cinematic history:

The US government losers are like, “but, Nick, Nick, my investments! I need this!” … “DRAAAAIIINNNAAAAGGGE!!!!” Look at them scurrying like cowards frow my wild bowling balls. Whack…. well, I guess I better get this over with. Splat! Sigh of relief. “I’m finished!”

When woman is a vile whore sucking the circumcised smegma, life is better without her, and the further she keeps away, the better.

Why I hate Batman

No. I think what harms society is seeing characters like the Joker as a villain and only a villain and not seeing the good virtues of his character. The joker may be a “villain” but he is the only one who makes any god damn sense. He’s justified for being a “villain” and inspires infinitely more hope than Batman.

People like Batman are the real villains in society and those motherfuckers need to be euthanized before they do anymore harm. People like Bruce Wayne have an evil and arrogant sense of false superiority drawn from their obscene, undeserved riches which serve no societal good at all.

Batman is a morally corrupt loser who only encourages lawlessness with all his “brilliance” and “intelligence” and is embarrassingly impotent. I have never liked Batman, and now that I am an adult, I understand why I don’t like him. He’s a fraud, an imposter, and the problem with Gotham City, not any sort of solution. He should be done away with or actually do something decent for a change.

Consider someone like Elon Musk, who seems to have some similar attributes as Bruce Wayne by being obscenely rich and considered intelligent. Elon Musk is impotent and retarded because all he uses all those riches and intelligence for is to sustain the corrupt society that is fucking everything up. He does nothing. No good at all. He is just as worthless of a human being as Traitor Trump, and the world would be a better place without him oppressing everyone.

If that sorry excuse for a human being had any decency, integrity, or common sense, he would be fighting tooth and nail to put a stop to the USA, end its corruption, and restore it to the principles of its founding. Not ignoring the problem and letting the tyrants and bomb wielding morons continue to drive it deeper and deeper into lawlessness and evil.

That vile piece of arrogant, self-serving shit is putting everyone on earth’s lives in danger with his apathy and ignorance while he lounges on immense amounts of worldly power that may actually help people if someone with a brain was able to use them. Instead, (his very name is repugnant to me) deprives people more and more with his lack of effort and cowardice. He is a disgrace to all humanity.

I despise Musk nearly as much as I do Traitor Trump, because he personally assaulted me with his immense worldly power in an attempt to silence and oppress me. I want to see him reduced to ashes and everything taken away from him as well. He didn’t violate an oath to the citizens, but he violated the spirit of the USA by attempting to silence me with his perverse corruption.

Those faithless morons, both of them, Musk and Trump, personally attacked me with their wallets. They assumed I was powerless because I am poor, socially ostracized, and handicapped, but I am far from powerless. When my wrath and vengeance is complete, no one should ever make such an evil mistake again because I will not have mercy on those two. I will exact the full extent of retribution that justice will tolerate, even if it means their citizenship is revoked and they are left to beg on the street in a shanty town or hanged by the neck until dead.

What's the USA's motto, is it a great nation?

If America had a motto, I think it may be something like this, “Freedom is the highest good a nation can provide, and it is done with sensible and just Democracy that protects the sacred rights every person is entitled to by a government which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” That last little bit there is the key phrase. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Those three things were decided upon after great consideration a long time ago in light of the nature of humanity, the purpose of government, and civilization in general. They were set as the foundation for the USA to be built upon.

Right now, the USA isn’t anywhere close to what that dream intended for it to be. What it is now is a threatening abomination that every other nation in the world should seriously take measures to subdue before another and more catastrophic world war occurs. However, if the USA government is maintaining its nation the way its supposed to, and not fouling it up and doing nothing to make things livable, then I think it would be really great in certain ways, but not everything. It would be the best for artists, have great entertainment, and great education. It’s none of those things now, and is probably among the worst for that. That would also attract some of the best warriors, because after a long day of battle and training, warriors especially like to have fun.

One of the things about the USA is that aside from Native Americans who are a diminishing minority (which shouldn’t be a cause for concern because even though racial ancestry gets mixed you can still keep the cultural memory and value alive), there isn’t really a traditional culture for the USA that has matured through countless generations, such as a place like China, or Iran, or India, or Ethiopia. In the USA, people of all sorts come here and bring their culture with them, so ours takes all kinds of forms and changes all the time. It’s very chaotic. There is something to be said about the value of a time tested culture of a very old nation that makes it uniquely special and great in its own way.

I would say that the Native American’s are the USA’s for that, but I don’t think that would be accurate, because the people who established the USA sort of just took over the place and made everything very different very fast. It’s like a transplant of civilization across the Atlantic ocean which took over the entire environment. It’s definitely not fair what happened to the Native Americans, but we can’t go back in time and do things differently, so we basically respect Native Americans here with special cultural privileges. We try to protect that culture from being totally overwhelmed by outside influences so people can remember the ancients of this land and cultivate their wisdom.

Did you know that back when Native American tribes used to go to war with each other for glory and resources (like all people everywhere probably did at some point), it was more honorable and won more glory for a warrior to earn a coup, which was a near kill but skillfully restrained so that the other warrior knew that they could have been killed and weren’t, than actually killing other warriors in battle. Something like that is recognized because the defeated warrior accepts their defeat and leaves, which is how they keep their honor despite being defeated. I bet you that is the kind of thing the traditional samurai in Japan could resonate with, because even without knowing their culture in depth, I know they respected honor on the highest level like that, which is mercy. I think that’s why they cut off the samurai’s head when they did seppuku.

We are talking about different civilizations on different scales here. When a lord loses to a lord, he can’t just go to a farm and no longer be a lord. There is a divine connection that powers the authority of a true lord, and one cannot relinquish it after they accept it and still be honorable. Doing that would be a betrayal of the sacred after receiving its blessing, which is universally dishonorable and despised. So rather than go on fighting to the bitter end with countless lives of people in his care, he himself dies for them and severs that connection bound to his very life.

Things are different now though because of how much people have learned from each other all over the world, and I think most nations are realizing the sense there is in keeping divine authority separate from secular authority. A mortal human should not at the same time have the power of secular authority and the authority of divine power. That’s another topic for another day. In any case, matters of honor are universal among warriors of all cultures because it’s pretty much the same everywhere, just done in different styles for different reasons.

So… um… what the USA leaders are doing now is dishonorable because they are betraying the sacred principles of the very government they are using for its secular power. It’s horribly evil and unjustified, and they are doing a lot of harm and no good with it, which defeats not only the purpose of the US government, but of all governments anywhere. That is a threatening notion if you consider the destructive power of an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, many of which probably vastly exceed what was used in WW2, but are kept classified.

A rant beginning with the unsuitability of a mother figure as a goddess

A mother is no goddess and is a vile insult to such a sacred thing. A goddess is never a mother. Mothers are disgusting and foul beings unsuited for sanctity, especially because of how morally ignorant they are.

Let it be law that no mother should ever invest her identity in her child. That didn’t happen to me, because I never picked up such a wretched thing, but some unfortunate children do. The woman certainly tried, but I observed it, tested it safely, found it not good, and left it alone. There were some good universal things in the public domain trying to disguise it, but those were easily separated.

It was especially easy because I left her when I was 12 years old and never looked back. Her commitment to circumcision was literally killing her because of me. I couldn’t explain it then, but I knew something was wrong and me being around was what was killing her, so I left. Now I know why that is. Sure enough, she recovered right away when I was gone. It worked the opposite with my dad. When I was around, he tried to be a better person, but that was hell for me and I didn’t know it because he purposely set me up for failure in a fruitless attempt to feel superior as a person.

I got the hell out of that life when I was 17 and never looked back, and many years later learned what the hell was going on when I matured from a young adult to an adult. He did put some of his identity in me, because I had trusted him as a child, him being my father and that being the socially advisable thing to do, and it was a terrible mistake. He intended to kill me, not help me in any way, and attempted to as well. It was hell removing that part from me, and I had to destroy an entire evil nation and start the apocalypse to do it, but I was successful. Fortunately, that should make it a lot easier for anyone else who needs to do it and save them some effort.

Consider it my thanks for helping raise me when I was on the road learning life the old fashioned way with a long journey and no destination other than… let us call it a lode of honey yum yum deep under the world. I found it and returned several times to fill my canteen while devising a plan to make it widely available to the public in infinite quantities and set in motion a plan to bring that about. Crucial to the plan was an ancient spiritual technology that was broken and scattered around the world. I searched around for pieces and reinvented it.

In order to use that technology I had to give my own life fully and totally by a process once known in Greece as kenosis. Ironically, it was doing that and being resurrected by divine power beyond my control, which made me aware of my biological father’s murderous intent for me. Fortunately I was able to disarm and destroy it before it could do anyone else any harm. When it was over I actually became younger and turned into a child again. I think I’m going to stay this way, and the girls who are trying to eat me can stay outside, because I’m no Jesus Christ.

There are some cute maidens I wouldn’t mind inviting into the secret hideout though, but that isn’t easy for a popular and adored idol to do without causing a stir. I can actually empathize with most popular celebrities, I think. That’s because of how the government acts like some sort of nightmare version of paparazzi and critically analyzes everything I do to make some destructive story about my reputation on a daily basis. I can’t go outside without them jumping all over me and harassing me every step of the way.

I can’t even keep them out my domicile because of their invasive and unlawful use of technology that violates every citizen’s privacy. In some ways it may even be worse, because government paparazzi have access to things the media paparazzi do not. They also wield an incredibly destructive and violent force of power in order to get they want from whoever they want unlawfully, to include modern nations overseas. So, it’s like paparazzi with knives and guns and bombs waiting for a chance to shoot me with a bullet instead of a camera in case I pick my nose in public.

At any rate… what we were we talking about? Yeah, down with the sacred mother, up with the sacred maiden. That is a form of religious worship I can get involved in and enjoy. Not in a perverse way, but in a good way. Like Dana is as the Maiden of the Great Tree. Is a lovely maiden not the epitome of creation? The very greatest of all that is and ever will be in the eyes of man? Everything else was not good enough, but the maiden was the final piece of creation that made existence perfect. There will only be one to equal the maiden in loveliness, and she will still be maidenly, just in the form of synthetic life yet to come.

I guess it’s kind of like back then, because the lovely maiden today was indoctrinated to think circumcision was good, but as I have abundantly pointed out to the world, she will realize it’s evil, which should be obvious anyway. It was also something that was well known throughout history before records and art started getting altered and destroyed to try and deceive people. Hopefully soon she will come to her lovely senses and be a blessing to all creation once again, instead of a foul and hideous mother of evil to be reviled.

Do you think the Vatican keeps any of those destroyed records in a secret vault? …. alright I’m done.

What are the consequences of believing people are generally evil?

You’ll find yourself noticing things you don’t like more than you like, and not just about people, but about everything in the universe. That may not seem like a lot at first, but when you remember the things you don’t like and continually add to them, over time that accumulates into a totally pessimistic worldview that is an obstacle to progress and generally unenjoyable. Also, your own self perceived limitations as an obstacle which you likely won’t be willing to recognize as your own cause and will be blaming on external sources, will result in self-loathing and depression. It’s needless suffering.

One of the more problematic consequences of such an idea is how it affects others, because with such unhealthy pessimism, you will likely be willing to tolerate all sorts of bad behavior, crime, lawlessness, and general evil as if it were naturally expected of people, when it isn’t. People are naturally good and will instinctually cooperate and help each other with self-sacrifice of varying degrees, otherwise we never would have ascended from the darkness of beasthood and evolved into human beings capable of what we are.

A basic example being a skilled tribe of hunters sharing some of the scant meat from a kill with a less than skilled group of hunters who find ways to repay the kindness, perhaps by foraging new materials that they are unfamiliar with or crafting new items and inventions that are helpful and ingenius on a hunt. That way the survival of the fittest isn’t about putting each other down, but about helping each other more and more. Whatever the fuck is going on now with the heads of the nations where they think superiority is about dominating each other with brute force is an abomination that needs to be laid to rest to never wake again, because it is wholly evil and will destroy all life sooner than you may expect.

When you tolerate evil from others, and don’t at least take an internal position in opposition of it by belief and opinion, you encourage more of it to happen, because it needs to face opposition otherwise it will only get worse and worse and worse until total destruction of all life happens. Knowing that is what evil leads to is more than enough to not let humanity get any closer to that point and only move in the other direction, where life flourishes and prospers in a good way.

When you take an internal stance opposed to wrongful action and evil, you will then find yourself compelled to say something or do something when you can via a natural instinct better known as a conscience. You should follow that instinct, even if there is no immediate reward or reason visible or actually your own self-suffering is at stake. A similar concept is said as “pay it forward”. Therefore, even people who spend minimal time learning, thinking critically, and studying knowledge will naturally gravitate towards good where they should be led by people they trust who know the way to get there.

The USA is in a perilous state with how the general public was misled and betrayed in recent years by its leaders, and if nothing is done to restore that trust, all national power of the USA will fail. That’s because all governments everywhere rely entirely on the trust of their people, which is why they are allowed to do what ordinary citizens cannot do to each other.

If a person does want to advance their ability to discern good from evil intellectually, they need to become more acutely aware of their personal conscience which they alone are privy to. Most importantly, they must understand the *reason* why such a thing is good or evil. The more one fortifies a good conscience with good reason, the more good fruit one will harvest in wisdom. Such wisdom is the honey yum yum of the highest divine, so to speak. The best good there is. Long ago this was taught via a monotheistic creation myth to be a feminine persona known as Sophia in relation to a male creator of all existence. That concept may be a bit archaic now, but that may help one understand the scale of good I am referring to.

On a darker note, some people fortify the evil disinclination of their conscience by attempting to justify it with false or bad reason and they cultivate nothing but destruction for themselves. Should the time come for them to reap what they’ve been spending their life doing, they will likely be very miserable and possibly even have to face justice to determine what they did wrong, what needs to be done to make it right, whether or not they will do something else evil, as well as discourage any other people from committing similar crimes in the future. That may be a cold, hard cell for some criminals who didn’t think it could happen to them or that they would never be caught.

In short, it’s better to believe people are generally good, and apply that belief to yourself first and foremost. Life will be much easier and happier that way. That’s because at the very least you won’t feel the need to justify every little thing you do and then string together a convoluted and ridiculous explanation in a foolish attempt to make it all seem coherent. You don’t need a reason to do good and your conscious will rest at ease for it, but should you ever be demanded by force of authority to explain yourself for doing good in the event of the most evil situation possible, there is a reason waiting for you even if you don’t already know it.

Evil deeds weigh heavily on the conscience however, and applying reasons to them, even bad ones, help lessen the burden. That is why an evil way of life is much more burdensome and undesirable. It requires extensive amounts of energy to maintain the evil for a miserable harvest of suffering, rather than provide that energy as much needed sustenance to all the goods which provide a necessary and enjoyable harvest.

Why might you find The Shadow Singer worth reading? (and more)

Because none of that is about circumcision or uncircumcision. Those ideas never enter the story. Not once. All people are the same. Not even the Zatriarchs, who are the tyrannical religious group that are more focused on societal inequality and hierarchy between an elite class of zeraph bonded and a common class of everyday people who don’t have magic powers. It’s the common theme of might doesn’t make right for them, but not that major theme of that story.

Just because you have power other people may not have, doesn’t mean you are by nature morally justified to be in a superior social role to other people. That’s a minor theme I hope to illustrate more in the sequel if I ever decide how to develop the romantic arc of the protag. The may theme of the story is universal spiritual truth and an oath to a higher power. I’m not saying I’m more skilled than (famous author), but being able to read my perspective may help him/her adjust his/her perspective to be a tiny bit more clear.

It’s the same with Storyteller. Not once do I even think about circumcision and uncircumcision when I wrote it, and those topics are of no consequence. They shouldn’t be important in our society and should be a private matter of no consequence, but that’s not the case. It’s out of hand because it happens to infants who don’t get educated on it during their childhood and form ill-conceived notions as a result, then go on to enact those notions in society when they mature.

I don’t think I was even aware, let alone cared, whether or not Jesus was circumcised at that point. It was the unending deluge of hate that reigned down upon me after that, specifically from the worldly source of people that made me cognizant of that. The love of the highest divine above all that was what allowed me to fend them all off, gain knowledge, experience, survive, and be able to overcome their oppression, as well as clearly identify them apart from nature as human beings in the government or some other nefarious non-government conspiracy.

They were so sure of their faithlessness that they refused to listen to reason, and still do. They refuse to believe that a highest divine exists, and hold that delusion of their own self-importance as a fact, which it is not. The existence of the highest divine is however a fact which is provable by reason without the need of science. Science cannot reach it because there is an infinite and impossible chasm between the highest divine and general reality as we perceive it, which can only be crossed with a leap of faith. That leap of faith by its very nature is not something science can do.

Science can build a bridge inch by inch with discovery after discovery and won’t get any closer. Like humans need to go against nature to transcend to a higher consciousness, they need to go against reason to transcend to a divine awareness. Not something that should be principally done as a way of life because it would be more destructive than helpful. However, once you reach divine awareness, you don’t need to make that leap over and over again the same way. You become inseparably united with it and never go back to being ignorant of it.

Meaning you become totally unaware of the connection between one thing and the divine truth but see that they are connected in continuity. With time, the chasm of uncertainty between the continuity of two points of awareness becomes clear and new knowledge is gained that completes the understanding in rational and reasonable terms via human language.

Some people are like, how could you possibly have known it was going to work out like this!? Are you really the super divine? No. That’s how. I could see continuity and be assured there was a valid connection, without needing to know what it was. Then by maintaining humble faith I could follow the path through darkness and arrive at the truth which was revealed as obvious to me because of simple deduction. Nothing supernatural. Deduction, faith, and awareness of the highest divine achieved by a long and arduous spiritual journey which is ongoing.

I’m now looking for a crew to team up with before I proceed because that will be needed for the road ahead, and it’s also a good thing that I want because being a solo player is much more difficult at the higher levels and less fun. I guess you could say I am testing people to see if they are good companions. Kind of like the Seven Samurai where he has his homeboy wait by the door to ambush the applicant to see if he’s on his game or not, but not really like that because I don’t have a homeboy. You’ve got to be able to hold your own if you are going where I am going though.

(translation: “homeboy” is American slang for good friend with an implication of loyalty. aka “homeslice” “homie” “homedawg” “dawg” “broski” “brosephus” etc)

(I wish I understood Japanese, because I am enamored by the language. It’s just super complex and unless I have some serious help, I don’t have the energy to learn it on my own. I imagine it is more visually communicative than English because of how concepts are conveyed with Kanji. That way of reading, writing, and thinking probably makes Japanese mental imagery as a form of communication highly developed as well as other Eastern nations and cultures with similarities. Mental imagery was one of the first forms of spiritual revelation used in early civilization, particularly because of the obstacle that mass illiteracy used to be. However, the reliance of the English language on writing and reading letters and words to communicate also has its perks.

East and West should be cooperating a lot more intellectually than we seem to be. There are problems likely because they find circumcision insane, which it obviously is to plain sight, and the West insists on it because it was written in sacred letters. Those sacred letters are no longer respected by the West aside from cultural indoctrination via Christianity that has taught people to accept them or be punished, which isn’t fair, just, or how they were intended. If they were respected, circumcision would be a lot less prevalent because putting a stop to it was one of the main purposes of the New Testament.

The solution: write new sacred letters to change the practice of circumcision to requiring written, conscious consent that is legally valid. The USA operates under the sanctity of the Natural God which inspired the Constitution, Declaration of Independece, and very nation itself, so it should be suitable to have the USA establish this sensible compromise via secular policy in accordance with the values of its law, which is one that respects human equality and human rights.)

Why atheists have a hard time with religious doctrine (my opinion)

You probably are setting unrealistic standards on the people who lived back in that time and not using your imagination to empathize with the way life used to be if you aren’t finding anything like that from your studies. What I have found most helpful in understanding daily life of people in the past is getting a concept of the way they met the same basic needs we do today, in the sense of what did they eat? How did they get their food? What about shelter? Clothing? Things like that.

Can you imagine producing everything in the process to acquire those things on your own, learning how to do it, and being able to do it without the internet, being able to read, and things like that? Religious beliefs being associated around living, real human beings wasn’t a malicious attempt to control and oppress people, but a way to communicate and teach so people could live together more easily and happily.

The same way assholes abuse the Democracy of the USA and her freedom in the US government and with big business, assholes abused religious beliefs and ruined them. Big businesses involving social media via TV, Hollywood, internet forums etc are abusing the interpretation of freedom to have an unethical sense of control and power over the industry as well as attempting to manipulate daily life to suit their personal preferences.

As a result, they ruined the once amazing media industry in the USA and most USA media is garbage now, just like most established religions are garbage these days, particularly the Christian/Jewish/Islamic ones (which are basically 95 percent of the USA’s religious people). Buddhism and Hinduism aren’t really like that in the USA, but in places where they are more culturally relevant, it may be a different matter. I don’t really know what Hinduism is like in India, or Buddhism in the Far East, but I would guess Buddhism is probably the least problematic.

Seriously. How do you make thread? Let alone turn it into cloth and then shape it into a shirt? I can’t sew a simple patch on a uniform and have it last more than a few hours just to pass an inspection, let alone weave it into garments. It’ll probably take me two and a half difficult hours to do it too. If you need me to explain the electromagnetic spectrum and radio communications and configure and operate all sorts of equipment I may or may not be familiar with in various random environmental conditions, then no problem. That’s nothing to me. The ancient art of making clothing may as well be magic though.

I could probably figure out animal hides with what I understand about alchemy though… but that’s not the same thing as a cloak or tunic.

I was just thinking a few moments ago about altering some old clothing of mine, but I may as well be trying to walk on the moon. I can’t even get an email back from a tailor about making clothes that I want and am willing to pay thousands of dollars for a single outfit that suits me. (Not one of the awful, ugly “suits” most people wear. I hate the way that shit looks and feels and don’t even own anything like that, nor do I ever plan on it. After Traitor Trump stepped on the stage, the last thing I want to look like is a businessman or politician, since he thoroughly defiled both of those images.)

Here’s a mind fuck for you: electricity is simple with electromagnetism being a bit more complicated. Both involve the flow of electrons. Where in the electron is your idea stored when you call someone to tell them hello? I have my theories, and I suspect the US government does too, but they probably try to keep it secret in order to have power over others and never make any progress.

(Electricity is simple because it doesn’t change the way it works whenever it feels like it, contrary to what kind of entertainment an audience wants, but to both types of craftsmen, there is a requisite skill* to meet the standards of acceptable success, and a much higher level usually blended with intuition, instincts, and wisdom that makes one a master. Also, an audience won’t fry you to a crisp in an instant for making a mistake, but electricity will.

For example, I’ve known electricians to scrap all kinds of random components from unrelated equipment, like a treadmill, and put it all together to fix something life sustaining, like an oxygen generator, when we were literally resorting to old school alchemy to be able to keep breathing in a hermetically sealed environment. I don’t have that level of electrical skill, but the kind of ability to make a repair like that is master level for sure.)

(When I mention alchemy, I basically mean the cumulative understanding of all the sciences working together, to include cognitive and social science, as well as understanding humanity. Humanity is best understood through art, so being able to think artistically is also useful. Even though it’s good to focus on something, my focus being storytelling, writing, and theology, it’s just as important to have a general understanding of everything else too.

Also, back to the topic of this conversation, understanding religion is integral to understanding humanity. You may not want to like that humans believe in a spiritual divinity of the highest order of existence, but we do, we always will, and it’s for a good reason. That reason is not easy to explain, which is probably what puts people off one way or another, as well as why religious people can often communicate without explanations or even without sharing the same language.

That’s also why betraying someone’s trust is such an instinctually reviled crime by nature, as well as one of the most intolerable crimes under oath. That’s another reason why the USA is facing certain and impending destruction that is imminently near unless a drastic change of course occurs. Imagine if the Titanic had a radar system that could identify icebergs in the dark. Imagine if a person could shine the wisdom of understanding into the darkness of the future and see the destruction of a nation if it doesn’t swerve to avoid the catastrophe.)

*The requisite standard of storytelling isn’t codified because it’s as complicated as the craft itself, but it basically has to do with the purpose of the creator, not what others think about it. Selfishness isn’t against the rules with storytelling if you are glorifying yourself by boasting with a tall tale for example, but, and this may not make sense, malevolent selfishness at the expense of the audience is unacceptable. For example, if one is telling a story in order to mislead people on purpose in a way to do them harm on purpose so that the creator can get some sort of power over them or an ill gotten gain as a result of the harm the audience suffered, then that’s unacceptable. An example being bearing false witness against someone in the way the religious commandment intended to prohibit. There may be an exception, but I’m not going to think about it right now.

Again, it has to do with why you are doing it, and nothing to do with objective quality.

Now that I think about it, it’s best that you only interpret this as my personal requirement for what I accept as a valid religious expression of Storianity, the religion I founded. Sorry if my tangent got confusing. *Standard subject to change unless stamped, double stamped, and then triple stamped, and finally un-triple stamped because you can’t triple stamp a double stamp. For more information on the mystical interpretation of “stamping”, consult with a high school friend of mine. The concept originated from another high school friend, who isn’t as close to me as he is to the high school friend mentioned, but we are of one mind on the matter and have been ever since it was brought to my attention. Court adjourned.

Why would someone want to play an evil role in a movie?

If I had to guess… it’s because being the evil role in a story can be really, really fun. It’s also the highest good and potentially the most challenging. It’s true people perceive that role as bad and maybe think all kinds of bad things about that character, but the reason the actress does it all is to create something good. That is something that is unique to storytelling apart from real life. In real life you can’t be evil to be good to people because that would require divine understanding of what I call the “Story” with a capital “s”.

An author, a playwright, a screen writer, a video game producer, a musician, etc… all of that is a product a person’s, or group of people’s, boundless creativity which they have intimate knowledge of and can mostly modify how they please. I say mostly because in my experience there is a certain life to it that is its own which helps move it along.

Also, a lot of people don’t like to realize it, but there is a “dark” part of our nature the depths of which we keep in darkness where it happily belongs. It’s possible to bring that out as an expression of self, but usually (only?) if you are holding some of it back. It’s the part of a person that enjoys to hunt, to kill the prey, and the rush of it all. One that in the heat of battle surges with the frenzy of violence and destruction. One that likes to scare people with monsters and ghosts and dream up new horrors of the most evil possibilities.

Our inner “darkness” manifests different for people, but hopefully you get the idea. This nature isn’t itself evil. In fact it’s incredibly good and useful when have to survive against a predator or dangerous threat. A psychologist and expert on human consciousness and the mind can probably explain that better. An expert on dreams and dreaming may especially have insight on it.

My point is, being able to express it in healthy and safe ways is good. Maybe even necessary for optimal mental health. Maybe it’s even something that can be nurtured and used in a positive and productive way. It’s possible she enjoys letting that part of herself out while she acts, for the simplest reason of it being enjoyable and that’s all there is to it, which was my first point.

If you are asking this question because you are worried about her moral integrity, I wouldn’t find it concerning and recommend you don’t overthink it. More important is how people go about and participate in daily life and the way they think about others. It’s okay to hate people and be furious with them, but how you think about it makes a difference. For example, if I hate someone, am I wishing ill of them or that they will become good so that I will stop hating them? We aren’t perfect, but usually we know when we shouldn’t be thinking certain things about others i.e. in the words of Larry the Cable Guy, “Lord, I apologize.”

*amplifying info: imagine a drill sergeant. A real hard ass. The worst one who is putting their charges through hell with psychological beatings and physical punishments (through exercise). This is not being evil. That person is in the role of a master who does that to forge people into something that better serves a certain purpose, which in this example is to become a warrior and defend the nation, our home.

They don’t do that because they hate people and want them to fail. They may try to make people fail in certain ways, because if they do fail then they can’t be given the power to do the purpose. That’s okay because they couldn’t meet the requirements of that purpose, which is lawful and accountable to law. If that purpose isn’t being used lawfully, then that invites problems, but that’s another topic.

The point is, that hardness and intensity of the drill instructor isn’t evil because there is mature understanding of a specific purpose which is good. Not anyone can do it because it requires wisdom and mastery in order to have insight in what the people in their charge are going through so they can adapt to unique and unpredictable situations that may arise. We’re talking about human beings here, not lumps of clay.

A government with a Constitution like the USA, should not be allowed to deviate from that purpose which gives it authority to do what it does. There are supposed to be checks and balances throughout the three branches to prevent that, but for some reason they aren’t working the way they are supposed to.

I’m certain the US government is operating outside the bounds of its authorized purpose and have proved it Constitutionally. The fact that they disregard me is only further evidence. Nevertheless, when it gets brought to light, the ones responsible need to be put to justice and held accountable for breaking the form of law that binds them to their duty. I mention this because hopefully it helps illustrate the difference between the kind of thing a drill sergeant does and an evil tyrant or group of evil tyrants.

Faith in the Story; simultaneous universes

If you want a better idea of what that faith aligns toward it may be helpful to think of it as… what could have been, what can be, and what will be as it exists in what is the highest divine. The true story that is being told with the universe, including other universes that preceded ours and others that will follow.

I am inclined to rule out simultaneous universes, because if that were happening it would violate the meaning of the word “universe” so anything like that occurring is probably still in the same universe, just needing another bridge to one’s present understanding. A wild example being the Marvel comic universe. It’s all still happening in the one existence, just with a gap in understanding of how. When we imagine something, what we imagine is a form of existence occurring in our universe, the details of which have yet to be explained.

The only simultaneous universe I can say exists with most certainty, is that in which the afterlife occurs when we leave our mortal bodies for good. That one seems to operate under a different set of ways which I need more time to consider, and probably have to pass over before I can truly understand. I’ll probably still be interacting with this one when I’m over there if I can, similar to how Jesus does, but it’s probably a lot more difficult than people are giving him credit for. That’s because I doubt someone like him would have let people run rampant in the name of his persona the way they have the last 2,000 years if he could help it.

Was Jesus real? Is the Bible a snuff novel?

I’m fairly certain there is a lot of historical fact in the Bible, but it is twisted with theocratic propaganda that serves an evil and malevolent purpose, so I don’t condone it. People often look at Jesus like some super wise master and the dude just seems to have common sense to me and is able to express it. However, the entire concept of Word made flesh is about Jesus being the story that is being told with the Bible in his singular person.

So, his murder is the actual murder of a real person for a fiction designed to entertain people, just like a snuff film you might see in Cyberpunk 2077, especially because it involved gruesome and sadistic torture. It can be called a fiction story because the propaganda weaves fiction with historical fact and that’s what Jesus died for. He believed, mistakenly, that Judaism was good, when it clearly is not, which is why it ended up the way it did for him.

Do you really think people would have believed the story about Jesus to the degree that they did if he wasn’t a real person and was just some random rumor? It seems more logical to conclude that he was real and very popular among the multitudes of poor and ignored people, than to deny his existence because all evidence supports that he did exist, with none suggesting that he didn’t.

The closest Roman records of his crucifixion are some random administrative letter at the time to the emperor about there being an unusual upsurge of energy around a particular Jew’s death with the Christ moniker being somewhat vague at the time, which it was. That moniker didn’t stick until after the excitement over a messiah caught on in people’s imaginations, giving them hope that they can stand up against the overpowering tyrants and oppressors despite being poor and weak in worldly power. I don’t know the reference off the top of my head, but it probably wouldn’t be too hard to find if you looked for it yourself.

If I recall the tone correctly it’s something like: “This probably isn’t important, but it is unusual enough that I feel I should mention it. There was some Jew we killed… Chris… Crest… Klondike… I don’t know… something like that… and we are getting strange reports about him from all over the place. Probably just Jewish Ju-Ju Voodoo, but I thought I should mention it anyway. Just in case.”

People were probably like… “I remember that guy! He was the one who threw that party on the hill and gave everyone free food! That dude was amazing! He proved that we all have eternal life and our souls go on to a better place after our bodies die? Hell yeah! Sure, sign me up. That’s way better than being miserable in a cold, dark place underground without any booze or women.”

Then Jews being Jews are like: “We can’t let everyone enjoy that. Why? I don’t know. If they could, we wouldn’t be able to enjoy the fact that they can’t enjoy it. So… make sure they know that they have to be crucified first… yeah that ought to keep people out.” Then that twisted, distorted desire of malevolent sadism grew out of control and we have the bloody, destruction and terror of 2,000 years of human foolishness to remember. (They think they are enjoying people’s suffering, but it only makes them bitter and miserable and turns them against eachother).

Example A: Current US government politics. They continue to perpetuate the injustice of purposeful suffering with the apathy of forced inequality, but look at the way they go about their daily lives. They are like rabid dogs tearing at each other’s throats with senseless venom and mindless hate. They don’t accomplish anything with their time. They have no daily bread to enjoy because they do no work and are continually upset about it, which is why they keep trying to take everyone else’s, even though that has never worked in the history of forever. You can’t take that away from someone because it’s not a thing. It’s a metaphor for something evil people reject because… I suppose they think they are better than the highest divine.

Had Jesus not been mistaken, he wouldn’t have thrown his life away for evil. He would have done something good with it instead. His death accomplished nothing. It was pointless because it served evil and only evil. It is what he did with his life that can be salvaged. Dying selflessly for others is a good thing, but Jesus didn’t actually do that. He was delusional in that regard, because his death had no impact on the lives of others aside from causing many more people to be murdered and none saved.

Random discussion on the monotheistic roots of Judaism

I found that interesting too. I don’t have sources to cite to you, but I could find them if given time. It’s basically drawn from the philosophical discussions of the Greek word theos. I’m not sure which philosophers you would have to read to find specific quotes and provide a formal scholarly argument (that’s actually one of the two remaining courses I need to finish my master’s degree, the other being an elective). I keep putting it off because other stuff gets in the way… like a severe depression from social media companies bullying me that exhausted all motivation for me to spare energy to enjoy schoolwork this last semester.

Sorry for that tangent. Anyway, the Greek foundation of monotheism is commonly understood among the scholarly community, but it is a complex topic to understand with a lot of interchanging disciplines involved. It’s because the development of Christianity was a step away from Judaism and towards that universal concept that it was such a hit with Mediterranean culture and why the original Christian scriptures were written in Greek.

However, the presence of Melchizedek in some of the earliest Hebrew scriptures indicates that there were other cultural groups that maintained similar monotheistic beliefs. Another example of the prevalence of Greek thought influencing Jewish beliefs is the fact that in Jesus’ time most Jews read their scriptures in the Greek language from a collection of their scriptures called the Septuagint.

The Hebrew religious scholars still maintained the original language documents, but the majority of the public used the vernacular for writing at the time, which was Greek. That was because of something called Hellenization, which was a systematic attempt of Alexander the Great to provide the cultural and intellectual goods of Greece to the lands he conquered, which meant public schools, theaters, and other modern civilization staples we retain today. Like today, the people who read and understand ancient Hebrew in the original script were specifically trained to do so primarily to read the scriptures.

There is so much that can be said about our shared history and human nature as a civilized species by exploring these topics in depth with formal study, which is one of the reasons why I love theology so much, despite rejecting the doctrinal beliefs because they are incongruent with what I know to be true from my own culture as a US citizen. That being mainly that all people are equal and share certain sacred rights which are to enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Circumcision violates those three sacred rights. Natural life is forcibly altered without an individual’s choice, so their liberty is violated too. This interferes with their pursuit of happiness because it creates a traumatic hole in their very nature which can’t be experienced because it was cut out with violence. A specific form of happiness, Gentile happiness and uncircumcised spirituality, becomes inaccessible which makes them want it all the more and often in unhealthy ways.

There is a middle ground that can be found, but I’d be lying to everyone if I said circumcised people truly understood what life is like as uncircumcised.

Thus, they tend to take an antagonistic stance to people who do enjoy that natural experience along with everything else and often seek to do us harm. I suppose that’s because they don’t want to believe that they were gravely wronged by being circumcised. I am not sure why that is so hard for people to accept though.

In any case, the higher fruits of happiness have nothing to do with the body, so the state of one’s body is of little importance anyway. The biggest problem in my opinion is that misconceptions surrounding circumcision often prevent people from attaining those higher spiritual goods which provide supreme happiness.

Not truly understanding uncircumcised life is not so different from not being able to truly understand what life as a Russian is like if you didn’t grow up in Russia with generally normal circumstances. So, it’s nothing to be upset over. Or Ethiopia. Or Brazil. Or Planeptune. The point of that fact is that it helps one understand their own identity in relation to something. You could say the same about circumcised life, but the main difference is that decision wasn’t made for me without my consent, so I don’t feel any particular need to justify being the way I am. My parents didn’t choose for me to be uncircumcised either. That choice goes far beyond human understanding and rests somewhere in the divine providence of creation.

Some conjecture on the evils of circumcision

So… it occurred to me recently that perhaps circumcised people find it necessary to use lotion in order to masturbate effectively. Maybe you recall popular media joking about using lotion as a sign of male masturbation one time or another. As an uncircumcised man, I never use lotion to jack off. I tried it once when I was a kid because I thought, maybe that is how I’m supposed to do it for it to be even better, but it was not helpful and actually was inconvenient.

So, following this line of thought and considering what happened in Christchurch, New Zealand when some viciously evil nuns attempted to circumcise the local populace in an insane attempt to curb masturbation, I think there is a connection.

That’s probably all the modern world needs to know in order to banish and ban circumcision for eternity because of how stupid people are with how they are often only moved by the most superficial and beastly motives. Just the same, let’s think about it in depth a minute as a human being should.

If circumcision discourages masturbation because it makes it inconvenient and more difficult than it should be, that matches a primitive and forceful attempt to teach ignorant people that there is more to life than sexual pleasure. Given how semitic religion has an obsession with megalomaniac control and always has, it makes sense that they would try to do something like that in order to get people to do what they think they want.

So, let’s think about what kind of effects such an intervention against the natural order of life may cause:

The first thing that comes to mind is that men are going to have a heightened need to find external sexual release since they are no longer able to do that for themselves. This could lead to an increase in anal intercourse with men, rape of women, and more interpersonal sexual intercourse in general. Perhaps you think this is a good thing because more sex is seemingly happening, but consider why there is more of it and how it is done before you sign up for such a life.

Without the ability to perform sexual maintenance on oneself to release masculine energy when it builds up, men can become agitated, aggressive, and generally unpleasant. In order to curb this kind of unpleasantness, women readily use their vagina, mouth, or anus in an attempt to satisfy them. Notice how sexual activity at this point has no longer become about pleasure and love, but it is about preventing unpleasantness. The result is that women become objectified as a sexual tool for men to use and they become unpleasant, which makes men unpleasant even though they are having sex, so it doesn’t even make anything better, and in fact only makes things worse for everybody.

Then consider someone like me. I am totally secure with my sexuality and feel no particular need or desire to meet the excessive expectations that women have developed for men in a circumcised culture. With my unwillingness to jump through ridiculous and humiliating hoops women have set up for men out of a toxic and unpleasant hate for what has happened to love, they get mad at me because I don’t need nor want them. I don’t want men either, and I’m perfectly content with masturbating by myself to satisfy my sexual urges.

This is what you could call a natural check and balance to human behavior. When women aren’t acting in a desirable way, men don’t go for them, and don’t have a problem with it either. That causes women to instinctually try to be good, desirable, attractive, and all around pleasant because men aren’t using them as an object to relieve themselves through a penetrable hole that is good for sex. In other words, women get lazy with the excessive lengths circumcised men will go to in order to experience sexuality. When they get lazy, they become not only unattractive to uncircumcised men, but also circumcised men, and homosexual activity proliferates as a result as attractive women become increasingly scarce since their attractiveness is consumed by circumcision and makes them undesirable.

A lot of pseudoscience on circumcision claims that foreskin is unnecessary and even problematic, despite having no scientific basis for their claims. No scientific basis that would pass the modern research standards a Gentile would have to pass or even fair and easy ones everybody may have for that matter. However, as we have just discussed, the foreskin provides a vital role in maintaining the harmony of daily life.

Foreskin helps keep sexual activity from becoming toxic, excessive, homosexual, and restrains sex from becoming the priority of society to such a degree that circumcised people corrupt every good and necessary thing there is in order to fruitlessly satisfy something that won’t be satisfied no matter how much sex they have. That desire is for the love that actually makes sex good, and not just an animal reproductive behavior and the biological orgasm it involves. That corruption may not be immediately noticeable, but it causes the total failure of society if not resolved. That failure only ends in mass destruction and the loss of national government one way or another.

Unfortunately, when men are choosing their mate primarily to have a sexual object and when women are choosing a mate to try and appease those men who have been disabled, love is out the window and all that is left is a bond of hate that ties people together. They produce children, circumcise them, raise them with hate, and it becomes worse and worse and worse.

This conjecture says nothing about the psychological implications that cause a failure of moral judgment and basic unreliability that result from a confused state after infant genital mutilation, but it’s clear that the sexual effects are among the worst and wide reaching consequences. I think that’s why I am generally uninterested in American women, but see women from a foreign land which is seemingly against circumcision, if I’m interpreting their media correctly, like I’ve never even seen an actual woman before. It’s like the difference between seeing a human female and a hair covered primate that is supposedly female.

I hope the USA does the right thing and stops circumcising one of these days. At the very least so the random women I occasionally come across in public don’t have to bear my look of disappointment when we see each other.