The Worst Mistake an Officer can Make and the Thermonuclear Microwave

Do you know the worst mistake an officer can make? It's when they think (subconsciously) believe they are better than us blue shirts. When they think of us as the "mob" and incapable of making decisions because we are too unintelligent, illiterate, and uneducated to understand what is happening. Not to mention unwashed because we are always sweaty and covered in grease and dirt. I’m like, "dude, when you were growing up, you never had to be aware of gang territory, did you?"

If they are ever like that, it doesn't take long for them to get a rude awakening by a chief or superior officer, and the next time you see them they are a shade paler and cooler. That is rare anyway and it is usually young people still learning the ropes of life in general because they haven't ever been "outside", and its fine. No hard feelings. You shouldn't be comfortable with the "outside" normally, and it's not necessary to be. It's also understandable why young people make those mistakes if they lack proper respect for what is out there when they've never experienced anything like it or properly informed.

Only very rarely, and I mean extremely rarely, does a person encounter stuff like that in normal everyday life "inside the walls" of civilization. Especially in modern, urban nations where getting "outside" is a lot trickier than just wandering into the forest. Aside from that, there is no such thing as unquestionable obedience in the USA military.

I've seen enough times when an officer gives "orders" and a chief straight up be like, "No. That is not happening." Or something like that in their own way. Then either they explain right then and there why it's not going to work or is a waste of time, or they do it later in private with other senior leaders. It's not done to insult them, humiliate them, or take their authority. It's usually because the officer doesn't understand the technical details of the equipment as it pertains to a unique situation that is infrequent but currently relevant and the officer is still relatively junior in their post.

It takes a long time to learn everything in complicated systematic organizations like a military command, and there can be a lot of stress at any moment. The explanation may be something like, "Sir, we cannot do that because when we bring the equipment for that out and set it up, it is like a propane grill fucked the cross of Christ on the Fourth of July during the fireworks and shat out a thermonuclear microwave. It is bulky, awkward, and requires two people.

“Since we are doing that other thing that Mr. So and So needs for the Bombast Balasalsa we have one person there and another there with someone else here while I go sip coffee and watch Americas Funniest Home Videos in the Goat Lounge. If we tried to do that other thing in the middle of the process at the part that requires us to wait two hours, but we wouldn't be able to put in all the semen samples to access the crypt keeper because he has a girlfriend, he has a boyfriend, and Pissed Off 3rd Class Morgan is topside on watch right now, besides, she doesn’t even make semen with her girl parts.

“No, they can't do it while that is still happening, because ever since that casualty occurred on the BSS Donkey Sack and that dude got hurt, there is a new instruction for Dank Div called number number dot letter number requiring all those people and some toilet paper. Did you not get that message and read the addendum? The one about section number number dot number letter in tech pub Up Yo Ass N Rnd the Corner? It went to your inbox along with the hundreds of others that I see come through every day. Yes, that one. Listen, I'm not saying it can't be done. Let me offer a recommendation that would work better."

My point!? My point!? I don't know, maybe it's that when the people who actually work get a fucked-up order that will get their people killed; not to mention fuck over the entire command when the eye of Sauron falls upon them and they lose their cush liberty because suddenly they are too busy jumping through inspection hoops and performing rites of orderly stick assing and nobody is allowed to go home; and get the one who gave the order court martialed and the one who carried it out Masted with a Bunyon Timber log from them old growth trees that don't grow anymore because they all got cut down, which could mean seriously docked pay and a demotion, they do not carry it out. They tell them: "No."

They have a wife and kids to feed. Bills to pay. That kind of thing. Can't afford to be doing stupid shit like that for numbnuts politicians trying to hide crime so they can get away with murder while at the same time keeping the bills of the people who actually work so high that they barely have enough to pay them because all the excess is paying for the murderer's personal grape feeders. Someone is going to rebuke that evil shit if it hasn't happened already because it was a turd of mass destruction sent rolling down from the top of the pyramid, and that ain't worth anybody dying for.

The Paradox of Judgment

Listen, the differential between judging society in general and an individual is kind of ambiguous. Some people are going to say stuff about a general social group that ticks off individuals personally because they are part of a group, and they may feel inclined to declare in response that they aren't like that because they truly aren't. Then sometimes someone will say something about an individual in the nicest way possible, and then conclude that the entire group is like that which could be upsetting in different ways. The point is that these kinds of verbal exchanges can get a bit bloody in the worst situations. Tolerate it.

Better to let words get bloody than have to settle things with physical violence. An apology can heal the wounds caused by words, but not those caused by guns and knives. That's why, in my opinion, I believe communist nations should protect free speech and information just as much as the USA is supposed to. It reduces threats of public violence, because tensions are relieved with heated exchanges of words and with greater efficiency the more good information there is available. If that cannot happen among the public, then the likelihood increases that people may "snap" under the strain of not being able to express their suffering adequately, and then they end up doing mass violence while in a broken mental state, which is a temporary and serious condition.

There is a line in this situation of passing judgment that designates when something is “too far”. I don't know how to define it now, other than this: if someone crosses that line in the future, it will be pointed out that what they are saying is worse than what I am.  Their words hit meaner, are too insulting, are too cruel, or are simply wrong because of how hurtful it is without truth. Listen to them when they say that and to what they are responding to as though this situation with me were happening all over again. Which you better pray to the gods and all that you believe holy that this does not happen again.

I have been exceptionally harsh with people, and I see no reason why others should ever need to be more severe than I am when in my most wrathful wordsmack form. If that happens, demand an apology. It shouldn't matter who you are, or who you are demanding one from, nor how you relate socially. You should always be able to have words with anyone when necessary and appropriate. An insult that demands an apology is always appropriate.

The simplest reason demanding an apology is of the utmost importance: an apology boils down to life or death. The longer explanation is that for the same reason that the tyrants refuse to apologize, they should apologize.  If they don’t, they are risking what they are so irrationally afraid of losing. You can apologize fine and not lose that. You can be totally in the wrong making a huge mistake like a total fool of devastating apocalyptic proportions, and not lose that if you are not too proud to say sorry.

So, if someone demands an apology or a word in the kind of way I am that demands the national government and the entire public’s attention, that means it is at least as serious of a life or death situation whether you recognize it or not. There is nothing to lose by granting a speedway to pride rock for them to say what is on their mind.  If they don’t have anything to say, they will look silly, big deal, but that kind of diversion is the kind of thing the government needs to allow, even when you get a practical joker up there who farts on stage and nothing more. The costs are negligible, and the benefits are infinite.

In those situations, the people concerned should approach it carefully, with a sense of fear, awareness, and caution of what they are not seeing coming out from their blind spot and shanking them in the kidney with a rusty shiv from Hell.  That kind of approach costs a person nothing, and ensures that they do not lose their head.  It is foolish to dismiss apologizing as an option because of pride, otherwise known as arrogance.

Do they think anyone believes they are infallible and cannot ever sin or make a mistake!? The very thought brings the wrath of the public upon them, saying nothing about divine wrath which is also awoken. Every person should know better than to believe themselves infallible. Even the pope. If the pope was infallible, Christianity wouldn’t have such a horrific history. That teaching is more of a bureaucratic thing to maintain order in the structural organization, in my opinion, because I don’t believe the pope is a divine person who cannot make mistakes and never sin.

He can represent that authority and speak with it, but that doesn’t make him any more or less human than anyone else. Besides, addressing situations that demand an apology shouldn't take more than a few minutes for most things, and be an infrequent necessity. For whatever chagrin a person may feel at saying sorry, the relief of forgiveness after is infinitely better than the slow poison of a begrudging guilt.

Consider the lesson of Jesus Crist’s life, death, and resurrection. Jesus died because people believed his sin was unforgivable. He died for a sin that he was accused of which the people who made the accusation believed was unforgivable. It is they who needed his forgiveness because they had no right to judge him for that sin without committing it themselves by judging guilt as the authority of the species (ideological species, not biological – like a living idea with a mind and will of its own).  Jews are humans, not divine beings, so they cannot be an authority of the species because they themselves are not of the species. ***They had no right to say that Jesus was not “God”, because if he was, they wouldn’t know it and they claimed that they did in fact know it.***  Jews are not divine beings any more than anyone else is, that being just a mote which grants us free will and the divine power to create good with free will.

Refusing to forgive someone’s sin is the worst thing I think a person could do as an offense against the highest divine (otherwise known as “God”).  Forgiveness doesn’t exonerate them from crimes or reparation, because there are other reasons why laws need to be enforced other than guilt and atonement.  However, it does change the way a person thinks about the person they forgave, and that is a big deal for both the victim and the offender. So, having died, his resurrection (at the very least in memory through these very words which call to mind the living, real person he is then and now), … his resurrection testifies that no person is beyond forgiveness. That means that everybody is subject to mercy and by association, wrath, of a higher power no matter the height at which they may recline.

Consider this: Even if Jesus had committed the sin he was accused of, and he didn’t, he should have been forgiven and dealt with mercifully, not the way it happened. In other words, even if Jesus was God and Man in the way he was accused of claiming to be, and then offended God in such a way as a Man would by actually committing the sin he was accused of, he would forgive himself as both a Man and God. If I could forgive him for that, he sure as hell can too if he wants.  Being able to forgive as a Man, means that the God self is also capable of forgiveness, because the power and authority of Man is not beyond that of the highest divine.

Furthermore, when the Jews accused Jesus of the sin he was sentenced to death for, Jesus completed the sin himself by accepting the punishment for it. He would not have accepted that punishment if he did not commit the sin, because even accepting punishment for such a sin commits that sin. It’s a horribly evil situation and why it is said he died for evil. It was a lost cause not worth dying for that he totally believed in with true faith because he was a bastard child who had nothing to believe about himself but the story of his national identity which he totally integrated into his person because it was intertwined with traditional sacred claims of several thousand years. Traditional sacred claims are personally powerful in ways that a legal claim in court is not, nor are new sacred claims nearly as powerful as traditionally established ones.

(My personal sacred claim to derive who I am from is none of your concern, but if you want to know more about who I am and see if learning about me can help you, I would appreciate a little more respect and kindness from you.  Cease doing the evil that you have been doing to attempt to get to know me. Things like stealing information in gluttonous amounts, invading my privacy, stalking me, and knowingly violating my human rights continually. I will believe what I want about myself, and you will not have any control over that, and I will hold you accountable to the law for doing me harm so egregiously for so long.  Go to hell with your evil thoughts as false gods, because you are not welcome around me with those.

None of you people can claim responsibility for who I am as a creator, because that is me alone, and I created who I am myself. I had nothing sacred I could identify with that completed the logical link between mortal man and the highest divine source which Christianity promises me is true. It cannot be Jesus Christ because he is a Jew and I thankfully have nothing to do with Jews and no relation to them, nor do I want a connection with those… people. Christianity is beneath me. It is not good enough for me, especially with people like that traitorous president claiming to be one.

Under no circumstances do I want to identify in the slightest with people like that. Being a man myself, and knowing my quality as a man in relation to other men, I don’t want to have any connection to such pitiable excuses for men. They are disgraceful and an embarrassment to all that can see them as they truly are.  I have more self-respect and dignity of a higher nature than they reach themselves, far more, so how can I be like them if they are beneath me in the hierarchy of men? They are surely like me, not the other way around, but unfortunately for them, they are not even recognizable because of how far they have strayed from the source at which I found myself and the Christ true.)

So, everyone should be willing to apologize if they do something wrong, or "sin" in some way. Nobody does wrong like that on purpose anyway (not true sin) which is why apologies are necessary when the situation is made clear as to how they went wrong and who it hurt.

The thing about words, is that anyone with communication skills can rearrange words to heal and do any sort of magic goodness in people's lives that rebounds them from the worst situations. Even though you may think in the moment that you'd rather be shot in the chest than insulted in such a way, it's not so bad because you just need a skilled wordmage to say the right thing to make it better. People with those talents, skills, and abilities that are not all that uncommon. You probably know one who could help you sort out any sort of situation with a good talk.

Whether or not you believe this, I can do that for the entire nation, for the treasonous presidents, for the shameful congress’, and anyone for that matter.  If I say the word, I could pull the entire god damn catastrophe of the USA’s failed government out of the fire, and save it from the eternal destruction they are condemned now to suffer because of their bad decisions upon bad decisions all because they are trying (and failing miserably), to hide their crimes and sins. Obviously they would need to repent with a contrite heart, but that is both the easiest and only way out of their problem, so it should be the obvious choice. They seriously think apologizing in public is going to be worse than the punishment of cold, hard justice which will bring about what they fear anyway?

There is no blaze of glory for them to be destroyed in such a way as refusing to do any good whatsoever, because their crime is ideologically evil, unintelligent, meaningless, disgraceful, and does not look remotely cool in any way. Did they not know that Jesus already died for sin? He already died for evil. It changed nothing and only made the situation worse, and they are supposed to have learned from that like everyone else.

They don’t even have a nation or idea they are trying to keep alive, because they betrayed their national sacred ideology openly to not die for it! Cowards in every sense of the word. Afraid of punishment, afraid to fight for the ideals they swore an oath to protect, and afraid of that one man, who is particularly unfortunate in life and disabled too. That actually makes him look incredibly bad ass for cowing them to such humiliation just by taking a stand. I’d better go help him, because if I’m not fighting with him when he wins, which we all know is going to happen, then… let’s not even go there. “Yo! Daisy! I got your back! Don’t give up the fight!”   

There is no question about whether or not they need to admit their mistakes and submit themselves to justice. It is necessary for the simple reason of correcting the damage which continually hiding their crimes and sins only makes worse. If they don't, the ship will still be flooding, the fire will still be burning out of control, and the breathable atmosphere will continue to deplete until it is entirely gone. As far as confronting me the way they need to, they don't have to like me, honor me, praise me, say nice things to me, or anything, but they do have to present themselves in my presence because what they did affected me personally as an individual worse than anyone (as far as I know), and I am the higher authority they answer to as the citizen.

People who practice eugenics are idiots

(A repost about why eugenics is stupid and counterproductive. Originally a comment to person’s explanation attempting to justify it.)

I understand the concept you are talking about, but I find it inherently flawed. For one, the immense complexity of life is navigated by equally complex human characteristics and factors, and knowing which kind of combination is going to work well and which isn’t, is virtually impossible. Even if a super intelligent computer could process all that data reasonably, it would still be flawed.

I argue that in any case, a spousal relationship based solely on love regardless of any trivial worldly factor, such as career, status, riches, or bodily characteristics, is going to have the highest likelihood of the best outcome for children. That’s because procreating through love alone is a profound act of love in which both partners give themselves to each other to create new life. That kind of love has tremendous spiritual power for shaping reality.

However, I’m not about to tell people who to marry or who not to marry, and as long as there aren’t people out there who deny the right of love to me or anyone else, there is no problem. It’s not always easy to find someone you love who also loves you though. So, sometimes people work with who they can, and that’s fine too.

….(additional explaination) the concept of love having spiritual power to shape reality is based on the observations of water crystallization with positive or negative emotions projected on it. You can probably find that researcg fairly easily with a general internet search. My point being that a loving spousal relationtionship affects the forming of the complete chain of DNA better than people who are hateful about life in general by thinking some people shouldn’t have the right to love. Procreating is the highest expression of love (potentially). …this was a topic from some time ago that I had to dredge up to repost and I’m not really going to spend much time thinking about it right now to add more info because honey yum yum. Maybe another time if it ever comes up.

Rain Down Theory of Economics

The problem with the current economy is simple. The people with the most money continue to accrue more money and waste the value of the dollar. This is especially problematic now because the previous president encouraged rich people to become more rich, and was encouraged to do so by rich people wanting to become more rich.

Allow me to explain why such a thing is counterproductive: As the people with the most income gain more money and further distance themselves from the income level of the majority, the value of the dollar weakens. Less people have power to use the dollar and so there is less power in the dollar altogether. They commit all kinds of greedy, shady maneuvers to become more rich but effectively only make themselves poorer.

The healthiest economy, and one where the individuals with the highest income have the most power with money, is one where the most people have power with money. The best way to establish this is to ensure that every person has easily available access to enough money to provide for all of their basic needs and then some. One doesn't have to be rich for that. To increase the value of the dollar, the poor should be given more money, and the cost of living balanced so it is useful. By increasing the value of the dollar, the rich people will increase the value of their money without needing to pile more of it.

One of the problems with hoards of money is that vast amounts of currency are idle and unproductive for the economy. Investing in the stock market is not a productive use of currency. There is no real value in the stock market. Real value is found in things like structures, equipment, products, labor, etc. The stock market indirectly may provide that, but only after profiteering individuals take a portion of the value for themselves. It may be useful for some business situations, but it shouldn't be considered a productive use of money to have it piled in banks and not being put to work for other people rather than just for the investor.

People who have exorbitant amounts of money have a responsibility to find productive ways to put their money to use. I call this "the burden of the rich". It is not something they should receive sympathy for unless in some unlikely situation they are being abused by a malignant and malicious government.

This is called "Rain Down Economics". Find ways to give more money to more people to use in the economy. In return the value of the dollar will increase and value of the money all people have will increase. The basic methodology is applied by sound business ethics. Businesses should not try to cheat people or extract maximum profit for basic needs, such as shelter. It is good to make a profit, but not good to make as much profit as possible for such things.

I hope this helps.

A child born of a Gentile and Jew wonders if he is a Jew (not a joke)

You are what you choose to be. Judaism is a religious ideology that is more secular than faith-based because of its morally evil theology. That is a factually true statement. Religion is generally about being a good person, but Judaism is generally about being an evil person, which is why I don’t respect them at all, and never will.

The Abrahamic Covenant from which all Jews identify with as their origin apart from everyone else, is undeniably evil and provably so. Therefore, you can choose to deny it, which is right, just, and true, and Judaism has no meaning other than a delusion people insist on by force of violence. So, it all depends on whether or not you believe what the Jews do about the Abrahamic Covenant. Jews will try to tell you that it’s not a choice, as an ethnicity, but it definitely is and that idea is a common deception they use to try and take advantage of other people.

Judaism is entirely based on an idea which is morally fraudulent and wrong and has nothing to do with physiology, genetics, race, ethnicity, or national identity unless you accept the false claim that they insist is true. That claim is not possible because it defies the goodness of the highest divine by being an evil act of worship in exchange for worldly power. That exchange is by all accounts not in accordance with the divine laws of truth and goodness which they are trying to manipulate to their evil advantage by faithlessly abusing the spiritual nature of humanity. They particularly take advantage of people like you who ask questions like this because you are seeking guidance or of people who are vulnerable and weak in general, such as newborn infants.

For example, the common use of the word “God” has two implications. One, it is a word used to identify when one is referring to the highest divine which is a concept that cannot be adequately expressed in human language. Two, it refers specifically to the Jewish deity of worship. Therefore, “God” is a superstition and there is no such thing. You need not fear anything like that because it is an evil, Jewish idea with no meaning other than causing their own torment.

The true concept which that confused word refers to has no need for a a written or spoken form and is self-evident without need of any expression. Not spoken, not written, not ritualized. Nothing. It takes no offense when someone denies what it isn’t, the word “God” or “YHWH” being prime examples of what the divine is not. It exists as it is and that is all there is to it. Nothing humans can do or say about it changes what it is and how it relates to all existence. No ritual, no sacrifice, nothing. Least of all a murderous and evil human sacrifice such as in the Abrahamic covenant or with Jesus.

Back in the day, a Christian or Jew would kill someone like me for saying this, but they can’t get away with that kind of lawlessness anymore. That is the only reason why it is still around in human consciousness. They murderously and violently forced everyone to pretend that it is to be taken seriously. They have no power to do that anymore and they are dwindling away to non-existence. The only thing that will remain, is the faint memory of obscure human history forgotten in obsolete archives and the lingering use of the word “Christ” or “Jesus Christ” as a form of profanity, insult, blasphemy, and a common expression of cursing.

Someday people may trace back the origins of why that word has any relevance as a hateful curse when there is no longer any memory of Judaism. They will delve into that obscure history to be horrified of the immense evil that darkened humanity as a result of the abomination and unlawful, evil, and failed experiment of Judaism.

Some people will probably doubt that it’s not so bad, because rumors will go around about a religion, and experts will be like, “oh no, it is. Look it up for yourself if you really think it might have any value,” and then help them find all information they may want. The conclusion being, “damn… Jews really are evil. Jesus Christ what the fuck!? How could human beings be so evil on a massive scale of public delusion? Holy shit… that’s why the government takes the law so seriously and why honor and integrity are important even though they seem like dorks sometimes and can be sticklers over the smallest matters that seem to make no difference. It all makes sense now.”

Is circumcision a “small matter”? What is the going value of human flesh?

You know how a lot of popular media portrays the future as a dystopian, grungy place that is dark, unpleasant, and generally fucked up with a tyrannical and evil government authority? That’s not how it’s going to be. That is what Judaism, Islam, and Christianity lead to, and we are putting a stop to it so it doesn’t happen. The future is going to be good, as it should be.

It’s fun to pretend you are a hero in an evil world like that and save everyone while gathering a harem of lovely maidens and always will be, but reality is going to actually be a good world. Really good. The evil problems of the world today are going to be unthinkable in the future and people will sometimes get reckless and rebellious and out of line which is normal and fine, but it will be mostly harmless. The difference is that light years before they even come close to the terror, evil, and malevolence of the world today, they will see or be shown their mistake, and either correct it or have it corrected if they won’t.

The days of evil humans acting like wild beasts that can bludgeon each other around with human inventions is coming to an end, and people like me are going to ensure that it never gets a chance to come back.

Additionally, it is not fun to actually live in an evil world and have to fight it. That is not a good feeling. It is a nightmare. It is only fun when playing make believe and pretending, and that’s the only place where evil can exist. If you ever notice evil in real life, it needs to be seen as the most severe threat and if you can’t put a stop to it on your own, find someone who can.

So, if you are in the distant future and looking back on history where evil happened, don’t pin the evil on the humans. Humans only do evil because they are confused. They never do evil on purpose. If they think they are doing it on purpose, they have no idea what they are doing and are stupid. They need to be put to justice, but they are still humans and humans aren’t evil. None of creation is evil. For further information on evil, feel free to look up my other discourses on the subject where I explain in full detail what it is, why it exists, and what to do about it.

How can autism be cured and what is its cause?

Round up all the cute maidens of marriageable quality from all the realms and deliver them before Nicholas Bylotas, official representative and ambassador of Autism Intergalactic. They will then enter into a loving and awesome harem with me. I will, after we say our honest, loving, and consensual vows, administer the cure by a secret method that I will never reveal or explain.

The cause? Honestly, the problem is mass ignorance from people who ignore certain vital matters of social and cultural importance. Autistic people often find these things impossible to ignore because we can sense how interconnected they are with everything else. Additionally, sensations can be rather intense for autistic people so that’s another reason why they can’t be ignored, because they are so problematic that something needs to be done about it because of how intensely we experience the problem. This is speaking in general, because autism is very diverse and can’t really be pinned down into specific definitions and categories, which is why it is recognized as a spectrum of endless possibilities.

If nobody saw that kind of thing as abnormal, and just listened to people who think differently with an open mind and didn’t often judge people negatively, then autism wouldn’t be considered a problem. Instead, people often shun others who think differently or don’t fit in with the normal social behaviors and thinking, which is why it becomes a disability. We may find it difficult to participate in society because people won’t allow us to and often perceive us with hostility because we are different, or because our ideas may indicate that society in general or specific systems need to change in fundamental ways.

I think the reason for that is that most people are faithless in general (without hope or belief in goodness beyond what they presently perceive as possible) and lazy. They think that fundamental changes are impossible because they don’t want to do any work, nor do they want to believe that there is something wrong with what they are doing and the way things are. That’s ridiculous behavior and thinking because society, a system, a government, or a religion, isn’t something people should take personally as if changing it is going to change them.

The reality is that change comes from what flows into those systems (what I think is aptly referred to as a spiritual substance of human nature) and is going to happen whether they like it or not. If they don’t anticipate it and adapt before it arrives, it’s going to be more difficult. A person attempting to initiate such change may seem angry, but that shouldn’t be seen as a sign of antagonism if you think about what they are saying and why.

Anger is a normal human emotion and shouldn’t be seen as hostility as much as it should be a sign of a person who requires aid of some sort. Seeing anger as threatening is very primitive because human beings should be aware of each other as similar to themselves. We all get angry from time to time, some more than others, but it doesn’t mean we want to kill everything even if in the most extreme cases we may feel like that momentarily. Like, “whoa, what has you so angry? is there something I can do to make it better? It was something I said? What part? Oh, sure, I will apologize. Can you acknowledge where I am coming from too? I was angry when I said that and it’s not really your fault, but I’m hurting because of it and I just need someone to care in the smallest way possible.” or “I see that you are angry about something I am unwilling to compromise on. Surely we can figure something out like reasonable human beings and set our personal feelings aside to do what is right, just, and good. Let’s talk about it and do something to make it better. I have some ideas on hand that may help.”

People who are megalomaniacs, commonly referred to as control freaks, have a big problem with people proposing ideas that don’t fit neatly into their scheme and destabilize all of their contrived machinations. That’s why people like Jesus get executed without a good reason, or otherwise have their lives oppressed to this day. Society in the USA is actually rather barbaric, uncivilized, and savage for that reason. They often act like chimpanzees who see an unfamiliar chimpanzee and try to kill it because they have an irrational, primal fear that anything unfamiliar but looks like them is a threat as an imposter.

So… I guess if there is an actual cure to autism, it is proper education. Autism won’t go away, but neurotypical people who have a problem with it won’t be troubled anymore. They are the ones that need to be cured, not the autistic people. We just need to live with it, and possibly require some accommodations, because it is part of who we are on a fundamental level that is related to our physiology with genetics and neurocognitive structure. I actually don’t want to be cured of it, because if it means I’m going to be normal like most people, I don’t want to be that way. I see what is normal to be a disgrace to humanity and a grave offense against moral dignity and good judgment, and after years of trying to understand, I have only been given more justification to see that as in fact what they are.

Why do circumcised people claim to be grateful they were circumcised?

That’s because you don’t know what you are missing and are lying to yourself. However, I bear you no ill will because you didn’t perpetuate that harm and malevolent deceit onto others. Your daughter is a problem though because you probably poisoned her soul to be a dick sucking whore that swallows the circumcised smegma as the evil duty of a typical female Jew slave who has no dignity. It’s much easier to cure your daughter than it would be to cure a circumcised son.

Basically she could just spend a nice weekend with me or any other decent Gentile and enjoy herself. Then she will forsake circumcision by realizing how burdensome, useless, and unpleasant it is to carry around, especially since she has her own burden to carry as a female. I can’t possibly love a circumcised male, so they don’t get to enjoy anything like that, unfortunately for them, but I can reason with them if they are capable of thought.

Back when women were material property the way children are now, they had no responsibility for the circumcision of males, but that is no longer the case these days. Now the burden of circumcision is doubled because two people commit that inestimably evil and pointless sin and have to carry it around along with everything else, making their lives far more miserable for no benefit. Their delusions of sexual preference actually make them more miserable because of how dehumanizing that form of sex is.

Sometime people are like, “you don’t know what you are missing by not being circumcised.” I’m like, I don’t even care! I don’t feel like I’m missing anything, unlike circumcised people who are reminded of it every time the see their own genitals. As the common saying goes “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” That saying, for those who don’t know, means that when you try to “fix” something that is working fine, you end up breaking it so it doesn’t work at all and make a problem when there wasn’t one.

The concept of improvement and advancement is different, because that’s not “fixing” something they way circumcision is often believed to do. I have no problem with being uncircumcised no matter what circumcised people accuse me of. They say all sorts of things they think and believe because of prejudice and bigotry, and I’m like, “whatever bro, sure.” I don’t have a single moment of stress or shame about it and don’t feel like I have to prove anything at all, because I don’t. I can, but I definitely don’t have to.

Myself, I drink the honey yum yum from the sacred valley of maidenly loveliness, if I ever have the opportunity, because it feels good and I like the taste. I stay far away from the putrid valleys of maidenly rottenness which are all over the place these days as a result of women dutifully swallowing circumcised smegma which corrupts their sanctity and befouls them.

A word of advice, many women are Jew slaves and take advantage men who cultivate honey yum yum with no respect for what we do in order to cultivate it. They then take their share of the goodness and give it to the circumcised male whose smegma they are swallowing. That male doesn’t enjoy it for its goodness, and instead defiles it into a means of doing harm, which further violates the sacred and is an offense to all that is decent.

As Jew slaves women don’t enjoy any of the benefits of life and simply must work without any dignity for circumcised men, which is why they do that. So, don’t just go around cultivating honey yum yum without thought, because Jews take advantage of that kindness to do meaningless harm to people in order destroy life and be hateful toward love in an attempt to ruin all honey yum yum everywhere. There is no reason anyone should want to do that, which is why all forms of blind obedience should be rejected, and why honey yum is extremely scarce in the USA.

(This was a response to an individual situation which is why the pronoun “you” is used and there is mention of a daughter.)

Does Hitler have a redeeming quality? The moral of the Bible.

He took a stand against Jews. He was misguided and confused about what good was and definitely didn’t know how to plan effectively or lead people, resulting in catastrophic crimes against humanity, but he did recognize Jews as evil and a threat to society, civilization, and life in general, which is more than you can say about a lot of people in the world these days. Most ignorant fools are actually helping Jews without knowing why and just do it because they are compelled to as slaves to evil.

Jews will be more than happy to have you help them, and will encourage it telling you anything you want hear and promising you riches and power beyond your wildest dreams. Then when you are no longer useful to them, they will happily stab you in the back to rifle whatever savings you were hiding from them and kidnap your women to keep as sex slaves for the most depraved, vile, and evil acts of perversity that satisfy malevolent sadism.

Jewish women, fearing the violence and cruelty of the men, will be even more harmful to them than the male Jews. That’s because they will betray feminine sanctity to give the male Jews insidious new ideas of how to torture women.

Eventually their hate will cause their society to fail because no one will be doing useful work and everyone doing evil useless work that only does harm, such as stock brokers. Crops will fail, resources will run out, and they’ll literally start cannabalizing each other. It’s around that time they will be so scared of their own death that they will turn to religion and try and remember how to be good. That well will have run dry as it was written, “and when that happens, your king will cry out for me, and I won’t answer,” and then Jews will be no more.

If there is a moral to the Bible, it’s that ignorance and apathy is the road to destruction. You should never just obey without question, prevent your own understanding of the truth, and do evil like Abraham did. Abraham’s malignant and malevolent idiocy has brought about nothing but useless strife, perdition, and suffering for all people who accept it. They follow like obedient minions because it’s what they are told to do and they don’t question why or follow their conscience, and in fact reject their conscience to obey, which any living being knows better than to do. Jews are basically the icon of sin, and a living example of failure, destruction, evil, and all that is morally repugnant that should be avoided at all costs.

Commentary on Maggot Eyes saying something about a Black man named Charlemagne

I posted this as a comment somewhere, but I’m just going to answer the question. I still don’t know who the fuck that guy is, but this is what I can surmise about him just from the context of the question:

Some asshole Black guy really has the name Charlemagne? I read this question and was like, who the fuck is that? In any case, don’t trust that guy, he’s not worthy.

Not because he’s Black, but because Charlemagne was a great person, and the loser in the question is not. That person, whoever the fuck they are, can be identified as a sycophant, a political slave with no will of their own, evil, and a disgrace to humanity because they are perpetuating an evil regime. They are also probably Protestant, which is also another basket of evil, infested dicks that should not be allowed anywhere near a human being. There is nothing great about that person.

Additionally, Charlemagne (the real one), was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by the Roman Catholic Pope. Aside from anyone trying to be an emperor of Christianity today being abominably evil, arrogant, and repugnant, I have to wonder why a parent would curse their child with a name like that. Probably wanted him to be a Protestant emperor, which is absurdly ignorant and morally wrong. Protestants are so fucking dumb it’s pathetic and offensive. They have no idea what Christianity is and are worse than Mormons with the way they twist it for their own private interests.

Protestants actually believe they don’t have to do any work. They teach a doctrine of apathy and laziness when their very faith as a religious doctrine is offensive and a blight on humanity. So, they make no efforts to be useful or good, while at the same time their presence offends, pollutes, violates love, and poisons life with evil in the form of human sacrifice and blood ritual.

They are like a parasite that has no symbiotic worth at all. They are purely malignant, like the alien face fucker that bursts out of a person’s chest after busting its load down their throat, murdering them and everyone else around them. In doing so, it also puts all of human life in danger by being a vicious creature that is extremely dangerous, has no sentience, which requires benevolence, compassion, and conscience, and it cannot be reasoned with. No. If someone is still claiming to be Christian today, they are identifying as ignorant, and if they are Protestant, they are identifying as malignantly ignorant.

Catholics have their problems, and I don’t mean to make them look good, but they at least maintain what it’s all about at their center, which is the Pope, even if they are struggling to remind everyone world-wide what that is. It’s hard to blame them after things got so out of hand with centuries of secular corruption in the form of unworthy kings, queens, emperors, and popes using the cross as a crude bludgeon to get their way. Christianity has very little credit these days, whereas in the beginning, it actually meant something to say you were Christian.

It means a hell of a lot more to a person’s good credit if they identify as a Satanist today, than it does to identify as a Christian. I mentioned this years ago in a letter I wrote to Barrack Obama, but basically, if Christians want to safely and reasonably extricate themselves from the Christian Story they put their honest faith in, Satanism is an acceptable avenue.

Guess what’s waiting for you at the end of the Christian avenue: a Jew with a knife who wants you as a slave working his fields so he can gloat over your humility and send you to die so he can take your wife. When you get there, if you turn your back because nobody wants that, there will be no hesitation when they plunge the knife into you, even if they claim to be your own father. Trust me. I know from experience, and it is not a good feeling. I’m also somewhat of an expert on the subject as a scholar of Christianity.

I would have credentials on my profile, but Quora won’t allow it. Their moderators have removed every credential, amounting to around ten, except one which is only valid when paired in relation to another, which they removed, to indicate a range of expertise. Those credentials which they won’t allow include the business I own and operate and have for over ten years and been tax accountable for, as well as my religion and hobbies.

My response to a Black racist

I believe you are a racist. You seem to have such a small mind that you can’t grasp the bigger picture of how the world works, and how long it has been that way. I suggest you pick up a book and try to educate yourself.

What do you think the people who established the USA have been fighting for? Do you think that was their first step? Or do you think maybe that was progress of a movement that has been going on under extreme oppression since Christ was murdered by racists who wouldn’t accept an idea of equality even from their own race, just to oppress the idea. The fact is, it has nothing to do with race, mostly to do with circumcision, and partly to do with human foolishness that prioritizes status and riches over anything of real value.

If you equate monetary riches with human value, such as in your example, you are so pathetically ignorant and morally deficient that you do not understand the first thing about what a human being is. I suggest you stop even talking about human rights because of how confused you are. Just get with the herd that goes to green pastures where money, status, and bull shit are unnecessary. That’s where we are going.

If you had any sense, you would see that those “wealthy” people, who are not actually wealthy because they are unhappy by constantly demanding more with unjust and evil means which never bring happiness, are actually unworthy of humanity. Instead, you seem to have accepted your own inferiority because of what you possess in relation to others, which means your entire movement has already been defeated. You measure your value with things, and are thus no better than a beast.

Seriously, dude. Think about what your answer says. Basically you are arguing that you are in fact inferior and you want me to acknowledge that. Enough with the self-pity please, because I have no respect for people like you who play the victim to try and get other people to fight for you instead of fighting for yourself. You are so uninspiring and a disappointment to humanity that I would never join your team. I would rather keep fighting solo against impossible odds, than side with someone as weak willed as you.

Either you won’t be able to guard my back because of your inability, or you will purposely betray me for a chicken wing on a string if I show you my back. In either case, your team is scheduled for destruction and I’m not going to be with you when it happens.

I would much rather be slain gloriously in battle than accept unjust and untruthful inferiority like you do in an attempt to get your own hoard of bananas. I prefer to eat the flesh of beasts anyway and will hunt to the ends of the earth and further to get my daily bread if that’s what it takes.

In real life, your skin color, your religion, whether or not you are circumcised, female, gay, whatever, doesn’t mean a god damn thing, because real life is immaterial and transcends the body. It’s what happens when you grow up as a person and why children are excused as children. A person doesn’t understand the nature of real life until they actually get there. In real life, what you do and what you say are more important than what you look like.

Furthermore, sex is generally* off limits in real life because it’s rude and there are often children present who are completely oblivious to what is happening and a person shouldn’t abuse that ignorance. That is why circumcision should have no importance anymore, especially if Christianity was anything like its purpose. Nobody gives a fuck about bodily things on that level because there are more important things to deal with that actually require thought, and the body is of little consequence. It’s not about eating food, it’s about sustaining agriculture, and truly delicious culinary creations.

It’s not about piling money, it’s about doing business in a prosperous and productive way that gives back more than it profits. Business should be motivated by profit, but if any of those idiots had any sense they wouldn’t be trying to drain as much profit as they can and would be trying to keep that at a minimum to meet their needs and reasonable desires appropriate to the scale of their business. Most of those people you were likely referring to as “wealthy” don’t know what real life is, even though they are rich because they are incapable of ascending above their creaturely body where real life occurs. If they did know, there is no way there would be as much evil in and corruption in the USA as there is because they wouldn’t tolerate it in their presence.

That is why making a big stink about white privilege and pointing blame at people over the color of their skin doesn’t accomplish anything. It’s just the clashing gongs of howling beasts in a dirty alleyway.

What's the USA's motto, is it a great nation?

If America had a motto, I think it may be something like this, “Freedom is the highest good a nation can provide, and it is done with sensible and just Democracy that protects the sacred rights every person is entitled to by a government which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” That last little bit there is the key phrase. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Those three things were decided upon after great consideration a long time ago in light of the nature of humanity, the purpose of government, and civilization in general. They were set as the foundation for the USA to be built upon.

Right now, the USA isn’t anywhere close to what that dream intended for it to be. What it is now is a threatening abomination that every other nation in the world should seriously take measures to subdue before another and more catastrophic world war occurs. However, if the USA government is maintaining its nation the way its supposed to, and not fouling it up and doing nothing to make things livable, then I think it would be really great in certain ways, but not everything. It would be the best for artists, have great entertainment, and great education. It’s none of those things now, and is probably among the worst for that. That would also attract some of the best warriors, because after a long day of battle and training, warriors especially like to have fun.

One of the things about the USA is that aside from Native Americans who are a diminishing minority (which shouldn’t be a cause for concern because even though racial ancestry gets mixed you can still keep the cultural memory and value alive), there isn’t really a traditional culture for the USA that has matured through countless generations, such as a place like China, or Iran, or India, or Ethiopia. In the USA, people of all sorts come here and bring their culture with them, so ours takes all kinds of forms and changes all the time. It’s very chaotic. There is something to be said about the value of a time tested culture of a very old nation that makes it uniquely special and great in its own way.

I would say that the Native American’s are the USA’s for that, but I don’t think that would be accurate, because the people who established the USA sort of just took over the place and made everything very different very fast. It’s like a transplant of civilization across the Atlantic ocean which took over the entire environment. It’s definitely not fair what happened to the Native Americans, but we can’t go back in time and do things differently, so we basically respect Native Americans here with special cultural privileges. We try to protect that culture from being totally overwhelmed by outside influences so people can remember the ancients of this land and cultivate their wisdom.

Did you know that back when Native American tribes used to go to war with each other for glory and resources (like all people everywhere probably did at some point), it was more honorable and won more glory for a warrior to earn a coup, which was a near kill but skillfully restrained so that the other warrior knew that they could have been killed and weren’t, than actually killing other warriors in battle. Something like that is recognized because the defeated warrior accepts their defeat and leaves, which is how they keep their honor despite being defeated. I bet you that is the kind of thing the traditional samurai in Japan could resonate with, because even without knowing their culture in depth, I know they respected honor on the highest level like that, which is mercy. I think that’s why they cut off the samurai’s head when they did seppuku.

We are talking about different civilizations on different scales here. When a lord loses to a lord, he can’t just go to a farm and no longer be a lord. There is a divine connection that powers the authority of a true lord, and one cannot relinquish it after they accept it and still be honorable. Doing that would be a betrayal of the sacred after receiving its blessing, which is universally dishonorable and despised. So rather than go on fighting to the bitter end with countless lives of people in his care, he himself dies for them and severs that connection bound to his very life.

Things are different now though because of how much people have learned from each other all over the world, and I think most nations are realizing the sense there is in keeping divine authority separate from secular authority. A mortal human should not at the same time have the power of secular authority and the authority of divine power. That’s another topic for another day. In any case, matters of honor are universal among warriors of all cultures because it’s pretty much the same everywhere, just done in different styles for different reasons.

So… um… what the USA leaders are doing now is dishonorable because they are betraying the sacred principles of the very government they are using for its secular power. It’s horribly evil and unjustified, and they are doing a lot of harm and no good with it, which defeats not only the purpose of the US government, but of all governments anywhere. That is a threatening notion if you consider the destructive power of an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, many of which probably vastly exceed what was used in WW2, but are kept classified.

What are the consequences of believing people are generally evil?

You’ll find yourself noticing things you don’t like more than you like, and not just about people, but about everything in the universe. That may not seem like a lot at first, but when you remember the things you don’t like and continually add to them, over time that accumulates into a totally pessimistic worldview that is an obstacle to progress and generally unenjoyable. Also, your own self perceived limitations as an obstacle which you likely won’t be willing to recognize as your own cause and will be blaming on external sources, will result in self-loathing and depression. It’s needless suffering.

One of the more problematic consequences of such an idea is how it affects others, because with such unhealthy pessimism, you will likely be willing to tolerate all sorts of bad behavior, crime, lawlessness, and general evil as if it were naturally expected of people, when it isn’t. People are naturally good and will instinctually cooperate and help each other with self-sacrifice of varying degrees, otherwise we never would have ascended from the darkness of beasthood and evolved into human beings capable of what we are.

A basic example being a skilled tribe of hunters sharing some of the scant meat from a kill with a less than skilled group of hunters who find ways to repay the kindness, perhaps by foraging new materials that they are unfamiliar with or crafting new items and inventions that are helpful and ingenius on a hunt. That way the survival of the fittest isn’t about putting each other down, but about helping each other more and more. Whatever the fuck is going on now with the heads of the nations where they think superiority is about dominating each other with brute force is an abomination that needs to be laid to rest to never wake again, because it is wholly evil and will destroy all life sooner than you may expect.

When you tolerate evil from others, and don’t at least take an internal position in opposition of it by belief and opinion, you encourage more of it to happen, because it needs to face opposition otherwise it will only get worse and worse and worse until total destruction of all life happens. Knowing that is what evil leads to is more than enough to not let humanity get any closer to that point and only move in the other direction, where life flourishes and prospers in a good way.

When you take an internal stance opposed to wrongful action and evil, you will then find yourself compelled to say something or do something when you can via a natural instinct better known as a conscience. You should follow that instinct, even if there is no immediate reward or reason visible or actually your own self-suffering is at stake. A similar concept is said as “pay it forward”. Therefore, even people who spend minimal time learning, thinking critically, and studying knowledge will naturally gravitate towards good where they should be led by people they trust who know the way to get there.

The USA is in a perilous state with how the general public was misled and betrayed in recent years by its leaders, and if nothing is done to restore that trust, all national power of the USA will fail. That’s because all governments everywhere rely entirely on the trust of their people, which is why they are allowed to do what ordinary citizens cannot do to each other.

If a person does want to advance their ability to discern good from evil intellectually, they need to become more acutely aware of their personal conscience which they alone are privy to. Most importantly, they must understand the *reason* why such a thing is good or evil. The more one fortifies a good conscience with good reason, the more good fruit one will harvest in wisdom. Such wisdom is the honey yum yum of the highest divine, so to speak. The best good there is. Long ago this was taught via a monotheistic creation myth to be a feminine persona known as Sophia in relation to a male creator of all existence. That concept may be a bit archaic now, but that may help one understand the scale of good I am referring to.

On a darker note, some people fortify the evil disinclination of their conscience by attempting to justify it with false or bad reason and they cultivate nothing but destruction for themselves. Should the time come for them to reap what they’ve been spending their life doing, they will likely be very miserable and possibly even have to face justice to determine what they did wrong, what needs to be done to make it right, whether or not they will do something else evil, as well as discourage any other people from committing similar crimes in the future. That may be a cold, hard cell for some criminals who didn’t think it could happen to them or that they would never be caught.

In short, it’s better to believe people are generally good, and apply that belief to yourself first and foremost. Life will be much easier and happier that way. That’s because at the very least you won’t feel the need to justify every little thing you do and then string together a convoluted and ridiculous explanation in a foolish attempt to make it all seem coherent. You don’t need a reason to do good and your conscious will rest at ease for it, but should you ever be demanded by force of authority to explain yourself for doing good in the event of the most evil situation possible, there is a reason waiting for you even if you don’t already know it.

Evil deeds weigh heavily on the conscience however, and applying reasons to them, even bad ones, help lessen the burden. That is why an evil way of life is much more burdensome and undesirable. It requires extensive amounts of energy to maintain the evil for a miserable harvest of suffering, rather than provide that energy as much needed sustenance to all the goods which provide a necessary and enjoyable harvest.

Why atheists have a hard time with religious doctrine (my opinion)

You probably are setting unrealistic standards on the people who lived back in that time and not using your imagination to empathize with the way life used to be if you aren’t finding anything like that from your studies. What I have found most helpful in understanding daily life of people in the past is getting a concept of the way they met the same basic needs we do today, in the sense of what did they eat? How did they get their food? What about shelter? Clothing? Things like that.

Can you imagine producing everything in the process to acquire those things on your own, learning how to do it, and being able to do it without the internet, being able to read, and things like that? Religious beliefs being associated around living, real human beings wasn’t a malicious attempt to control and oppress people, but a way to communicate and teach so people could live together more easily and happily.

The same way assholes abuse the Democracy of the USA and her freedom in the US government and with big business, assholes abused religious beliefs and ruined them. Big businesses involving social media via TV, Hollywood, internet forums etc are abusing the interpretation of freedom to have an unethical sense of control and power over the industry as well as attempting to manipulate daily life to suit their personal preferences.

As a result, they ruined the once amazing media industry in the USA and most USA media is garbage now, just like most established religions are garbage these days, particularly the Christian/Jewish/Islamic ones (which are basically 95 percent of the USA’s religious people). Buddhism and Hinduism aren’t really like that in the USA, but in places where they are more culturally relevant, it may be a different matter. I don’t really know what Hinduism is like in India, or Buddhism in the Far East, but I would guess Buddhism is probably the least problematic.

Seriously. How do you make thread? Let alone turn it into cloth and then shape it into a shirt? I can’t sew a simple patch on a uniform and have it last more than a few hours just to pass an inspection, let alone weave it into garments. It’ll probably take me two and a half difficult hours to do it too. If you need me to explain the electromagnetic spectrum and radio communications and configure and operate all sorts of equipment I may or may not be familiar with in various random environmental conditions, then no problem. That’s nothing to me. The ancient art of making clothing may as well be magic though.

I could probably figure out animal hides with what I understand about alchemy though… but that’s not the same thing as a cloak or tunic.

I was just thinking a few moments ago about altering some old clothing of mine, but I may as well be trying to walk on the moon. I can’t even get an email back from a tailor about making clothes that I want and am willing to pay thousands of dollars for a single outfit that suits me. (Not one of the awful, ugly “suits” most people wear. I hate the way that shit looks and feels and don’t even own anything like that, nor do I ever plan on it. After Traitor Trump stepped on the stage, the last thing I want to look like is a businessman or politician, since he thoroughly defiled both of those images.)

Here’s a mind fuck for you: electricity is simple with electromagnetism being a bit more complicated. Both involve the flow of electrons. Where in the electron is your idea stored when you call someone to tell them hello? I have my theories, and I suspect the US government does too, but they probably try to keep it secret in order to have power over others and never make any progress.

(Electricity is simple because it doesn’t change the way it works whenever it feels like it, contrary to what kind of entertainment an audience wants, but to both types of craftsmen, there is a requisite skill* to meet the standards of acceptable success, and a much higher level usually blended with intuition, instincts, and wisdom that makes one a master. Also, an audience won’t fry you to a crisp in an instant for making a mistake, but electricity will.

For example, I’ve known electricians to scrap all kinds of random components from unrelated equipment, like a treadmill, and put it all together to fix something life sustaining, like an oxygen generator, when we were literally resorting to old school alchemy to be able to keep breathing in a hermetically sealed environment. I don’t have that level of electrical skill, but the kind of ability to make a repair like that is master level for sure.)

(When I mention alchemy, I basically mean the cumulative understanding of all the sciences working together, to include cognitive and social science, as well as understanding humanity. Humanity is best understood through art, so being able to think artistically is also useful. Even though it’s good to focus on something, my focus being storytelling, writing, and theology, it’s just as important to have a general understanding of everything else too.

Also, back to the topic of this conversation, understanding religion is integral to understanding humanity. You may not want to like that humans believe in a spiritual divinity of the highest order of existence, but we do, we always will, and it’s for a good reason. That reason is not easy to explain, which is probably what puts people off one way or another, as well as why religious people can often communicate without explanations or even without sharing the same language.

That’s also why betraying someone’s trust is such an instinctually reviled crime by nature, as well as one of the most intolerable crimes under oath. That’s another reason why the USA is facing certain and impending destruction that is imminently near unless a drastic change of course occurs. Imagine if the Titanic had a radar system that could identify icebergs in the dark. Imagine if a person could shine the wisdom of understanding into the darkness of the future and see the destruction of a nation if it doesn’t swerve to avoid the catastrophe.)

*The requisite standard of storytelling isn’t codified because it’s as complicated as the craft itself, but it basically has to do with the purpose of the creator, not what others think about it. Selfishness isn’t against the rules with storytelling if you are glorifying yourself by boasting with a tall tale for example, but, and this may not make sense, malevolent selfishness at the expense of the audience is unacceptable. For example, if one is telling a story in order to mislead people on purpose in a way to do them harm on purpose so that the creator can get some sort of power over them or an ill gotten gain as a result of the harm the audience suffered, then that’s unacceptable. An example being bearing false witness against someone in the way the religious commandment intended to prohibit. There may be an exception, but I’m not going to think about it right now.

Again, it has to do with why you are doing it, and nothing to do with objective quality.

Now that I think about it, it’s best that you only interpret this as my personal requirement for what I accept as a valid religious expression of Storianity, the religion I founded. Sorry if my tangent got confusing. *Standard subject to change unless stamped, double stamped, and then triple stamped, and finally un-triple stamped because you can’t triple stamp a double stamp. For more information on the mystical interpretation of “stamping”, consult with a high school friend of mine. The concept originated from another high school friend, who isn’t as close to me as he is to the high school friend mentioned, but we are of one mind on the matter and have been ever since it was brought to my attention. Court adjourned.

Why would someone want to play an evil role in a movie?

If I had to guess… it’s because being the evil role in a story can be really, really fun. It’s also the highest good and potentially the most challenging. It’s true people perceive that role as bad and maybe think all kinds of bad things about that character, but the reason the actress does it all is to create something good. That is something that is unique to storytelling apart from real life. In real life you can’t be evil to be good to people because that would require divine understanding of what I call the “Story” with a capital “s”.

An author, a playwright, a screen writer, a video game producer, a musician, etc… all of that is a product a person’s, or group of people’s, boundless creativity which they have intimate knowledge of and can mostly modify how they please. I say mostly because in my experience there is a certain life to it that is its own which helps move it along.

Also, a lot of people don’t like to realize it, but there is a “dark” part of our nature the depths of which we keep in darkness where it happily belongs. It’s possible to bring that out as an expression of self, but usually (only?) if you are holding some of it back. It’s the part of a person that enjoys to hunt, to kill the prey, and the rush of it all. One that in the heat of battle surges with the frenzy of violence and destruction. One that likes to scare people with monsters and ghosts and dream up new horrors of the most evil possibilities.

Our inner “darkness” manifests different for people, but hopefully you get the idea. This nature isn’t itself evil. In fact it’s incredibly good and useful when have to survive against a predator or dangerous threat. A psychologist and expert on human consciousness and the mind can probably explain that better. An expert on dreams and dreaming may especially have insight on it.

My point is, being able to express it in healthy and safe ways is good. Maybe even necessary for optimal mental health. Maybe it’s even something that can be nurtured and used in a positive and productive way. It’s possible she enjoys letting that part of herself out while she acts, for the simplest reason of it being enjoyable and that’s all there is to it, which was my first point.

If you are asking this question because you are worried about her moral integrity, I wouldn’t find it concerning and recommend you don’t overthink it. More important is how people go about and participate in daily life and the way they think about others. It’s okay to hate people and be furious with them, but how you think about it makes a difference. For example, if I hate someone, am I wishing ill of them or that they will become good so that I will stop hating them? We aren’t perfect, but usually we know when we shouldn’t be thinking certain things about others i.e. in the words of Larry the Cable Guy, “Lord, I apologize.”

*amplifying info: imagine a drill sergeant. A real hard ass. The worst one who is putting their charges through hell with psychological beatings and physical punishments (through exercise). This is not being evil. That person is in the role of a master who does that to forge people into something that better serves a certain purpose, which in this example is to become a warrior and defend the nation, our home.

They don’t do that because they hate people and want them to fail. They may try to make people fail in certain ways, because if they do fail then they can’t be given the power to do the purpose. That’s okay because they couldn’t meet the requirements of that purpose, which is lawful and accountable to law. If that purpose isn’t being used lawfully, then that invites problems, but that’s another topic.

The point is, that hardness and intensity of the drill instructor isn’t evil because there is mature understanding of a specific purpose which is good. Not anyone can do it because it requires wisdom and mastery in order to have insight in what the people in their charge are going through so they can adapt to unique and unpredictable situations that may arise. We’re talking about human beings here, not lumps of clay.

A government with a Constitution like the USA, should not be allowed to deviate from that purpose which gives it authority to do what it does. There are supposed to be checks and balances throughout the three branches to prevent that, but for some reason they aren’t working the way they are supposed to.

I’m certain the US government is operating outside the bounds of its authorized purpose and have proved it Constitutionally. The fact that they disregard me is only further evidence. Nevertheless, when it gets brought to light, the ones responsible need to be put to justice and held accountable for breaking the form of law that binds them to their duty. I mention this because hopefully it helps illustrate the difference between the kind of thing a drill sergeant does and an evil tyrant or group of evil tyrants.

Was Jesus real? Is the Bible a snuff novel?

I’m fairly certain there is a lot of historical fact in the Bible, but it is twisted with theocratic propaganda that serves an evil and malevolent purpose, so I don’t condone it. People often look at Jesus like some super wise master and the dude just seems to have common sense to me and is able to express it. However, the entire concept of Word made flesh is about Jesus being the story that is being told with the Bible in his singular person.

So, his murder is the actual murder of a real person for a fiction designed to entertain people, just like a snuff film you might see in Cyberpunk 2077, especially because it involved gruesome and sadistic torture. It can be called a fiction story because the propaganda weaves fiction with historical fact and that’s what Jesus died for. He believed, mistakenly, that Judaism was good, when it clearly is not, which is why it ended up the way it did for him.

Do you really think people would have believed the story about Jesus to the degree that they did if he wasn’t a real person and was just some random rumor? It seems more logical to conclude that he was real and very popular among the multitudes of poor and ignored people, than to deny his existence because all evidence supports that he did exist, with none suggesting that he didn’t.

The closest Roman records of his crucifixion are some random administrative letter at the time to the emperor about there being an unusual upsurge of energy around a particular Jew’s death with the Christ moniker being somewhat vague at the time, which it was. That moniker didn’t stick until after the excitement over a messiah caught on in people’s imaginations, giving them hope that they can stand up against the overpowering tyrants and oppressors despite being poor and weak in worldly power. I don’t know the reference off the top of my head, but it probably wouldn’t be too hard to find if you looked for it yourself.

If I recall the tone correctly it’s something like: “This probably isn’t important, but it is unusual enough that I feel I should mention it. There was some Jew we killed… Chris… Crest… Klondike… I don’t know… something like that… and we are getting strange reports about him from all over the place. Probably just Jewish Ju-Ju Voodoo, but I thought I should mention it anyway. Just in case.”

People were probably like… “I remember that guy! He was the one who threw that party on the hill and gave everyone free food! That dude was amazing! He proved that we all have eternal life and our souls go on to a better place after our bodies die? Hell yeah! Sure, sign me up. That’s way better than being miserable in a cold, dark place underground without any booze or women.”

Then Jews being Jews are like: “We can’t let everyone enjoy that. Why? I don’t know. If they could, we wouldn’t be able to enjoy the fact that they can’t enjoy it. So… make sure they know that they have to be crucified first… yeah that ought to keep people out.” Then that twisted, distorted desire of malevolent sadism grew out of control and we have the bloody, destruction and terror of 2,000 years of human foolishness to remember. (They think they are enjoying people’s suffering, but it only makes them bitter and miserable and turns them against eachother).

Example A: Current US government politics. They continue to perpetuate the injustice of purposeful suffering with the apathy of forced inequality, but look at the way they go about their daily lives. They are like rabid dogs tearing at each other’s throats with senseless venom and mindless hate. They don’t accomplish anything with their time. They have no daily bread to enjoy because they do no work and are continually upset about it, which is why they keep trying to take everyone else’s, even though that has never worked in the history of forever. You can’t take that away from someone because it’s not a thing. It’s a metaphor for something evil people reject because… I suppose they think they are better than the highest divine.

Had Jesus not been mistaken, he wouldn’t have thrown his life away for evil. He would have done something good with it instead. His death accomplished nothing. It was pointless because it served evil and only evil. It is what he did with his life that can be salvaged. Dying selflessly for others is a good thing, but Jesus didn’t actually do that. He was delusional in that regard, because his death had no impact on the lives of others aside from causing many more people to be murdered and none saved.

Random discussion on the monotheistic roots of Judaism

I found that interesting too. I don’t have sources to cite to you, but I could find them if given time. It’s basically drawn from the philosophical discussions of the Greek word theos. I’m not sure which philosophers you would have to read to find specific quotes and provide a formal scholarly argument (that’s actually one of the two remaining courses I need to finish my master’s degree, the other being an elective). I keep putting it off because other stuff gets in the way… like a severe depression from social media companies bullying me that exhausted all motivation for me to spare energy to enjoy schoolwork this last semester.

Sorry for that tangent. Anyway, the Greek foundation of monotheism is commonly understood among the scholarly community, but it is a complex topic to understand with a lot of interchanging disciplines involved. It’s because the development of Christianity was a step away from Judaism and towards that universal concept that it was such a hit with Mediterranean culture and why the original Christian scriptures were written in Greek.

However, the presence of Melchizedek in some of the earliest Hebrew scriptures indicates that there were other cultural groups that maintained similar monotheistic beliefs. Another example of the prevalence of Greek thought influencing Jewish beliefs is the fact that in Jesus’ time most Jews read their scriptures in the Greek language from a collection of their scriptures called the Septuagint.

The Hebrew religious scholars still maintained the original language documents, but the majority of the public used the vernacular for writing at the time, which was Greek. That was because of something called Hellenization, which was a systematic attempt of Alexander the Great to provide the cultural and intellectual goods of Greece to the lands he conquered, which meant public schools, theaters, and other modern civilization staples we retain today. Like today, the people who read and understand ancient Hebrew in the original script were specifically trained to do so primarily to read the scriptures.

There is so much that can be said about our shared history and human nature as a civilized species by exploring these topics in depth with formal study, which is one of the reasons why I love theology so much, despite rejecting the doctrinal beliefs because they are incongruent with what I know to be true from my own culture as a US citizen. That being mainly that all people are equal and share certain sacred rights which are to enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Circumcision violates those three sacred rights. Natural life is forcibly altered without an individual’s choice, so their liberty is violated too. This interferes with their pursuit of happiness because it creates a traumatic hole in their very nature which can’t be experienced because it was cut out with violence. A specific form of happiness, Gentile happiness and uncircumcised spirituality, becomes inaccessible which makes them want it all the more and often in unhealthy ways.

There is a middle ground that can be found, but I’d be lying to everyone if I said circumcised people truly understood what life is like as uncircumcised.

Thus, they tend to take an antagonistic stance to people who do enjoy that natural experience along with everything else and often seek to do us harm. I suppose that’s because they don’t want to believe that they were gravely wronged by being circumcised. I am not sure why that is so hard for people to accept though.

In any case, the higher fruits of happiness have nothing to do with the body, so the state of one’s body is of little importance anyway. The biggest problem in my opinion is that misconceptions surrounding circumcision often prevent people from attaining those higher spiritual goods which provide supreme happiness.

Not truly understanding uncircumcised life is not so different from not being able to truly understand what life as a Russian is like if you didn’t grow up in Russia with generally normal circumstances. So, it’s nothing to be upset over. Or Ethiopia. Or Brazil. Or Planeptune. The point of that fact is that it helps one understand their own identity in relation to something. You could say the same about circumcised life, but the main difference is that decision wasn’t made for me without my consent, so I don’t feel any particular need to justify being the way I am. My parents didn’t choose for me to be uncircumcised either. That choice goes far beyond human understanding and rests somewhere in the divine providence of creation.

Some conjecture on the evils of circumcision

So… it occurred to me recently that perhaps circumcised people find it necessary to use lotion in order to masturbate effectively. Maybe you recall popular media joking about using lotion as a sign of male masturbation one time or another. As an uncircumcised man, I never use lotion to jack off. I tried it once when I was a kid because I thought, maybe that is how I’m supposed to do it for it to be even better, but it was not helpful and actually was inconvenient.

So, following this line of thought and considering what happened in Christchurch, New Zealand when some viciously evil nuns attempted to circumcise the local populace in an insane attempt to curb masturbation, I think there is a connection.

That’s probably all the modern world needs to know in order to banish and ban circumcision for eternity because of how stupid people are with how they are often only moved by the most superficial and beastly motives. Just the same, let’s think about it in depth a minute as a human being should.

If circumcision discourages masturbation because it makes it inconvenient and more difficult than it should be, that matches a primitive and forceful attempt to teach ignorant people that there is more to life than sexual pleasure. Given how semitic religion has an obsession with megalomaniac control and always has, it makes sense that they would try to do something like that in order to get people to do what they think they want.

So, let’s think about what kind of effects such an intervention against the natural order of life may cause:

The first thing that comes to mind is that men are going to have a heightened need to find external sexual release since they are no longer able to do that for themselves. This could lead to an increase in anal intercourse with men, rape of women, and more interpersonal sexual intercourse in general. Perhaps you think this is a good thing because more sex is seemingly happening, but consider why there is more of it and how it is done before you sign up for such a life.

Without the ability to perform sexual maintenance on oneself to release masculine energy when it builds up, men can become agitated, aggressive, and generally unpleasant. In order to curb this kind of unpleasantness, women readily use their vagina, mouth, or anus in an attempt to satisfy them. Notice how sexual activity at this point has no longer become about pleasure and love, but it is about preventing unpleasantness. The result is that women become objectified as a sexual tool for men to use and they become unpleasant, which makes men unpleasant even though they are having sex, so it doesn’t even make anything better, and in fact only makes things worse for everybody.

Then consider someone like me. I am totally secure with my sexuality and feel no particular need or desire to meet the excessive expectations that women have developed for men in a circumcised culture. With my unwillingness to jump through ridiculous and humiliating hoops women have set up for men out of a toxic and unpleasant hate for what has happened to love, they get mad at me because I don’t need nor want them. I don’t want men either, and I’m perfectly content with masturbating by myself to satisfy my sexual urges.

This is what you could call a natural check and balance to human behavior. When women aren’t acting in a desirable way, men don’t go for them, and don’t have a problem with it either. That causes women to instinctually try to be good, desirable, attractive, and all around pleasant because men aren’t using them as an object to relieve themselves through a penetrable hole that is good for sex. In other words, women get lazy with the excessive lengths circumcised men will go to in order to experience sexuality. When they get lazy, they become not only unattractive to uncircumcised men, but also circumcised men, and homosexual activity proliferates as a result as attractive women become increasingly scarce since their attractiveness is consumed by circumcision and makes them undesirable.

A lot of pseudoscience on circumcision claims that foreskin is unnecessary and even problematic, despite having no scientific basis for their claims. No scientific basis that would pass the modern research standards a Gentile would have to pass or even fair and easy ones everybody may have for that matter. However, as we have just discussed, the foreskin provides a vital role in maintaining the harmony of daily life.

Foreskin helps keep sexual activity from becoming toxic, excessive, homosexual, and restrains sex from becoming the priority of society to such a degree that circumcised people corrupt every good and necessary thing there is in order to fruitlessly satisfy something that won’t be satisfied no matter how much sex they have. That desire is for the love that actually makes sex good, and not just an animal reproductive behavior and the biological orgasm it involves. That corruption may not be immediately noticeable, but it causes the total failure of society if not resolved. That failure only ends in mass destruction and the loss of national government one way or another.

Unfortunately, when men are choosing their mate primarily to have a sexual object and when women are choosing a mate to try and appease those men who have been disabled, love is out the window and all that is left is a bond of hate that ties people together. They produce children, circumcise them, raise them with hate, and it becomes worse and worse and worse.

This conjecture says nothing about the psychological implications that cause a failure of moral judgment and basic unreliability that result from a confused state after infant genital mutilation, but it’s clear that the sexual effects are among the worst and wide reaching consequences. I think that’s why I am generally uninterested in American women, but see women from a foreign land which is seemingly against circumcision, if I’m interpreting their media correctly, like I’ve never even seen an actual woman before. It’s like the difference between seeing a human female and a hair covered primate that is supposedly female.

I hope the USA does the right thing and stops circumcising one of these days. At the very least so the random women I occasionally come across in public don’t have to bear my look of disappointment when we see each other.

The moral justification for hating Jews and semitism in general

There is a simple logic to my hatred of Jews that should be easy to understand. Jews believe they are superior as a group by applying a sacred spiritual principle to their justification. Whether that group be an ethnic, national, or religious, or all three, such a claim by sacred spiritual principle is evil because of its unjustified arrogance and antagonism toward others.

Also, the reason by which Jews claim their spiritual principle is itself evil, because their faith was acknowledged by a distinctly evil and only evil act, i.e. the human sacrifice of one’s own child on an altar. So, both the core belief and reason behind the core belief are evil, and I hate evil, therefore I hate Jews. In any case, if a person denies the religious claim of Jews, their ethnic claim doesn’t exist, and any person can deny a religious claim of their own free will. Therefore, the ethnic claim of Jews is entirely irrelevant.

Why pro-circumcision research is pseudoscience

This article was my response to a comment on Quora that attempted to justify circumcision by stating that it eliminates a hygienic burden and prevents the possibility that foreskin can become infected.

That’s my point. You need to do normal hygiene that requires negligible effort so you amputate the part? Just use some soap and water while you bathe! That’s been working even before indoor plumbing was regularly available for most people worldwide. If you are taking such extreme actions to avoid such a minor responsibility of natural human life, then you are being excessively lazy and it’s probably affecting other parts of your life.

Flossing my teeth requires more effort than maintaining my dick, and it’s probably more important too. A problem like you mention is entirely imagined by people who don’t understand the situation. I’m going to be real with you: my foreskin has been inflamed with probably what you would call an infection maybe two or three times in my life (currently 33yo) that I can remember. Why? Idk.

Once when I was out hitchhiking, masturbated, and went on an arduous hike the next day after I had been sleeping in the dirt, on the street, and other random places for some time. The solution? A little bit of soap and water with some careful cleaning (5 minutes tops), and the next day it was back to normal like it never even happened. It didn’t even hurt. This may sound strange to you, but it actually felt unusually good when rubbing against my pants, like satisfying an itch does.

Also, and please refrain from judging me personally, I bathe even less now and still masturbate regularly, and it’s never an issue. Why those things happen is often because other factors are involved. All I have to do to stay mostly clean so that there isn’t any smegma or odor (which isn’t unpleasant or extreme because even if it’s there it’s contained under the foreskin) is wipe myself with a clean paper towel after I am done. It’s seriously not a big deal. I would probably do the same thing even if I didn’t have foreskin.

If you are engaging in sexual intercourse of any kind, you should bathe first no matter what kind of genitalia you have, as well as after because of the kind of thing that is happening biologically with bodily fluids from other immune systems than your own. That’s one of the reasons why ritual bathing before a marriage was a cultural tradition in most places. Now that bathing is a household commodity in most nations, that’s just expected and it’s no longer a formal community ritual that includes all the good stuff that was hard to come by for most people, like special fragranced soap or a big kettle that can heat bath water.

If people are more likely to get stds, like some research claims, it still isn’t a good reason because there is internal medicine that can cure the related stds and measures that can reliably prevent them. If nothing else, advocating abstinence is a better choice than circumcising people without their cognizant consent. In regard to cognizant consent, infant circumcision is unjust for the same line of reasoning that explains why someone can be released from a contractual agreement if they signed it while drunk or otherwise impaired by drugs, especially if the other party knew that and took advantage of the situation.

Btw, the std claim is pseudoscience because the population sample of their research (any study that claims that) isn’t sufficient to make a general claim about humanity, especially not without a full examination of their daily behaviors, choice of partners, and other factors that could affect that statistic, including cultural, economic, and demographic ones. Who people have sex with and why is a very complicated subject.

I’m not saying circumcision itself is what is shameful or wrong, but the way it is most often done and the misconceptions about it are shameful. That physical violence, even if you minimize it, which to me is hard to do because it seems nightmarishly horrible and I’m sure I would feel that way if I was still a newborn infant, does more harm to the psyche of an individual than what it claims to prevent from happening to the body. That’s why I’m saying pro-circumcision research is unscientific; it arrives at an unsubstantiated and illogical conclusion.

Additional comment because I sensed some uneasiness about the topic of smegma: What? The presence of smegma? So what? Your nose has boogers too. Are you ashamed that sometimes after you take a big, nasty shit that doesn’t pinch properly, you probably still have some shit residue around your asshole somewhere, even after going through way more toilet paper than usual? Yeah, it’s gross and you don’t want people to notice so you probably clean yourself instinctually, but that’s no reason to put a plastic hose up your ass whenever you go number two so your poop never touches your sphincter, which is considerably less extreme than removing a body part.

Audibles and Basic Battle Theory

Perhaps you are unfamiliar with American football. Here is a discussion of it:

An audible is an improvised change of plans at the last possible moment. These plans are carried out through a combination of coordinated actions by a team of eleven people (which is substantially more than three or four in practical terms).

This coordination is accomplished without communication to explain what each individual must do in order to synchronize their efforts to achieve a goal, aside from a few key words. Those words, the “audible”, engage their situational awareness of the opposition that is attempting to thwart them from achieving their goal, and modify their actions to adjust for threats and protect vulnerable assets from harm.

It’s vitally important that the opposition doesn’t understand what they are going to do. In this case the evil-minded people are quite literally stupid and can’t comprehend good thinking, otherwise they wouldn’t be evil and the USA would be a better place, so you can talk openly in front of them, and they still won’t understand. My efforts to avert catastrophe over the last six years demonstrate this clearly, and it will be widely known why that is in detail, in time. Suffice it to say that evil is always ignorant. They will never learn because they use their will to block out the reason and goodness that would prevent their malicious and harmful actions. Therefore, they must be punished like an animal, because that’s the only way to communicate to them.

A common audible phrase is something like “blue forty two!” where “blue” “4” and “2” are all parts of a system of operations. They can also be something as obscure as “Margie! Margie! Sophia!” In the field they require a perceptive leader who can read the opposition’s position and anticipate their actions and run a mental scenario of those actions against the current plan. If the outcome isn’t favorable, they can step into the role of the higher authority than themselves to make necessary adjustments with their own judgement.

To be effective with an audible one needs a skillful team who has trained in their roles well enough to understand them thoroughly, as well as able to synchronize with each other through the intuitive bond that teammates form by working together.

So, in short, I don’t need to tell them exactly what to do. They can look at the situation right in front of them and determine their actions on their own. With an understanding of their role in the government, and by cooperating with others who share the goal of ending corruption and tyranny in the US government, they can adjust for how the enemy has rearranged itself in their evil efforts to destroy what is good.

Even with all the plan changing, it takes individual skill and power to carry it through. That’s just the nature of battle. If you aren’t skillful or powerful enough, you may lose the battle even though you are morally correct. Take heart in that scenario, because in moral battles there will always be increasing good forces to fight for freedom, hope, and love against evil, and less and less evil forces who fight for their own destruction and suffering. Also, training is better done with a good master than an evil master, so good forces are potentially more skillful and powerful too.

That’s why evil always resorts to treachery, deception, lawlessness, and all that shady stuff. Good forces can use those tactics too, but you can almost always guarantee that they are an evil force if they are fighting that way and avoiding all forms open confrontation. A method of determining which clandestine agent is good or evil, if you catch two spies, is by examining what their manner of deception is, how it affects others, and what their goal is.